Jump to content

Talk:Logan International Airport: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Korean Air: new section
Dfiner (talk | contribs)
183 edits
Line 127: Line 127:


There were no sources stating that Korean Air service is a resumption. The source provided says that this is a new service. [[User:AddictedFlyer21|AddictedFlyer21]] ([[User talk:AddictedFlyer21|talk]]) 06:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
There were no sources stating that Korean Air service is a resumption. The source provided says that this is a new service. [[User:AddictedFlyer21|AddictedFlyer21]] ([[User talk:AddictedFlyer21|talk]]) 06:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

"There are no sources stating that Korean Air service is a resumption" is an untrue statement. Here is a reliable source stating that exactly: https://www.routesonline.com/news/29/breaking-news/279981/why-korean-air-is-returning-to-boston-/ It is common knowledge that Korean Air served Boston until about 1999. This is precisely why the Boston Logan page is so annoying to try to edit.

Revision as of 15:20, 11 August 2018

Unidirectional?

"Runway 14/32, which officially opened to air traffic on November 23, 2006, is unidirectional. Runway 32 is used for landings and 14 is used for takeoffs." So the runway operations go in two different directions; landings are flying westward and takeoffs are flying eastward. Since two different directions are used for operations on the runway, is "unidirectional" an appropriate word to describe it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Unidirectional" appears to be the term used by the airport and the FAA; it means that a given operation happens in only one direction on a runway, not that airplanes move on it in only one direction. The object is to have no airplanes flying over the end of the runway that is near a dense residential area.209.6.73.78 (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Logan International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2017

Virgin Atlantic Clubhouse reference link (#77) needs to be updated following VS's website update - new URL: https://www.virginatlantic.com/gb/en/virgin-experience/clubhouses-and-treats/our-clubhouses/boston-clubhouse.html 185.46.212.64 (talk) 08:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

link fix request

The first External Link, "Official website", 404's. It goes to 

    https://www.massport.com/logan/

A link that works is 

    https://www.massport.com/logan-airport/

209.6.73.78 (talk) 20:55, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Control Tower Height

The height of the control tower is listed as "nearly a dozen stories high." This should actually say "nearly two dozen stories high." The tower is 22 stories (approx 270'-0" to the roof of the offices, excluding the ATC "cab" on the top, which pushes the height even higher to nearly 280'). "A dozen" is the wrong way to characterize the height.

50.195.28.73 (talk) 17:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sao Paulo flights now bookable

Sao Paulo flights are now bookable on LATAM - This can now be officially added.

http://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,latam-brasil-lanca-voos-para-boston-e-duas-cidades-da-argentina,70002084258

2601:181:C380:5B10:5080:1E17:C13D:1B12 (talk) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Logan International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Southwest Airlines to New Orleans (KMSY)

Fares to KMSY from KBOS on Southwest Airlines are now available on Southwest Airlines' website for the listed start date of March 10, 2018. The "dubious -- discuss" marker can now be removed.

Bbrsox (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Cancun and Charleston service not seasonal but will be year round

Hello, 

 Delta Mainline service to Cancun and DCI service to Charleston will be year round (albeit not daily for Cancun)not seasonal.

TACV service to Sal

Sal, Cape Verde was added as a non-stop destination from BOS with a reference to TACV's website booking page but no non-stop flights can be found on their website nor can any flights be found on any flight tracker website. I have added a "dubious -- discuss" marker to the relevant page.

Bbrsox (talk) 19:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is correct that Sal is only served via Praia. However Sal is listed here because TACV does not have traffic rights soley between Sal and Praia and therefore Sal is considered direct from Boston as per our guidelines for such situations. Best regards.
It seems dubious to me that TACV, as Cape Verde's national carrier, would not have rights between two Cape Verdean islands. I am not 100% familiar with these flights so you may be correct, but please add a reference if possible. Additionally, if your statement is true, would it be prudent to add a notation to the bottom of the destinations page saying that the flight from KBOS-GVNP continues on to GVAC but that TACV does not have traffic rights between GVNP and GVAC? (Similar to the note on the Los Angeles International Airport page regarding Qantas service between Australia and Kennedy Airport in New York.)

Bbrsox (talk) 22:48, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Caribbean Airlines BOS-Kingston/Port of Spain

Does anyone have a source for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:181:C300:3750:5080:1E17:C13D:1B12 (talk) 23:58, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Korean Air

There were no sources stating that Korean Air service is a resumption. The source provided says that this is a new service. AddictedFlyer21 (talk) 06:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"There are no sources stating that Korean Air service is a resumption" is an untrue statement. Here is a reliable source stating that exactly: https://www.routesonline.com/news/29/breaking-news/279981/why-korean-air-is-returning-to-boston-/ It is common knowledge that Korean Air served Boston until about 1999. This is precisely why the Boston Logan page is so annoying to try to edit.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Logan_International_Airport&oldid=854464686"