Talk:Fenqing: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Hammersbach (talk | contribs) Formatting... |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WPCHINA|class=stub|importance=low}} |
{{WPCHINA|class=stub|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Linguistics}} |
|||
==Chinese vs. English versions== |
==Chinese vs. English versions== |
||
I didn't read the Chinese version of this entry. However, I believe that the English version of this entry is not necessarily a translation of Chinese entry.[[User:Plarq|Plarq]] 00:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Plarq |
I didn't read the Chinese version of this entry. However, I believe that the English version of this entry is not necessarily a translation of Chinese entry.[[User:Plarq|Plarq]] 00:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Plarq |
Revision as of 10:00, 28 September 2018
![]() | China Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Linguistics Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Chinese vs. English versions
I didn't read the Chinese version of this entry. However, I believe that the English version of this entry is not necessarily a translation of Chinese entry.Plarq 00:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Plarq
- According the original article, there is no mention of nuclear weapon. If this is a direct translation of the article in Chinese, the sentence "support the use of nuclear weapons to pressure the Taiwanese government" should be removed or revised.
- As a native speaker of Chinese I'm not sure if this English version is meant to differ from the original text,or something went wrong.But here's what I find out.It seems the translator inserted too much personal sentiment into the article.
- Again according to the original article in Chinese,besides a few lines out of nowhere,much of the following paragraph is also made up:
- The fenqing generally take pride in their beliefs and passion, considering themselves patriotic. Their critics, however, may consider them obnoxious or even fascist, and refer to them using a pun: "粪青" (lit. shit-youth, same pronunciation), which can be changed further to "粪粪" (lit. shit-shit). In response, fenqing refer to their most vehement opponents as hanjian (汉奸 lit. "traitor(s) of China") or tewu (特务 lit. "spy/spies [of the enemy]").
- At the very least,there was no mention of fascism,"hanjian" or "tewu" in the original text.
- A more accurate translation would be:
- ...This term first appeared in Hong Kong in the 1970s, referring to those young people who were not satisfied with Chinese society and sought reform. ...
- Nowadays it has evolved to be an exclusive Internet slang(especially in mainland China),along with other replacive terms including FQ and "粪青" (lit. shit-youth, same pronunciation), which can be changed further to "粪粪" (lit. shit-shit).
- Whether "Fenqing" in nature is derogatory or commendatory depends on the person.Critics use it in a derogatory sense to criticize such people,while many others take pride in being a Fenqing.
- Moreover,it's controversial now that "粪青"(shit-youth) equals Fenqing.
- While the original meaning of Fenqing can be either positive or negative,and a Fenqing can be reasonable or irrational,extreme or only angry,"shit-youth" is indeed considered an insulting term used by both Fenqing and other people.
- Also,the common belief is that Fenqing does come from Angry Young man.
- I added the above person's suggested NPOV paragraph into the article. --220.245.178.135 04:33, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Fenqing's connotation
It is definitely negative now. I don't think being a nationalistic idiot is anything positive, now or ever. Arbiteroftruth 15:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- ...neither is being a moronic ideologue that values certain political ideologies over national sovereignty. There's a fine line between patriotism and zealotry, and most of the Fenqing haven't crossed that line yet.
- And let's not forget “奋青”, which definitely carries a positive connotation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.149.158.81 (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
This article was created by the NED in co-operation with the CIA, Charter 08, FLG and S-Club 7
I saw it on Anti-CNN so it must be true! :/ FOARP (talk) 21:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC)