Jump to content

User talk:Zenomonoz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Adding sockpuppetry block notice per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenomonoz
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
| image = [[File:Sock block.svg|55px]]
| image = [[File:Sock block.svg|55px]]
| text = '''''This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppetry]]{{#if:[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenomonoz]]|&#32;per evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenomonoz]]}}. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for ''[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 16:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}}
| text = '''''This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppetry]]{{#if:[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenomonoz]]|&#32;per evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenomonoz]]}}. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for ''[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 16:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}}

== Bbb23 EXPOSED ==
Dear [[User talk:Bbb23|Bbb23]], you have been EXPOSED. Lmfao I have never seen a mod ban people indefinitely for literally sourcing major news stories and then claiming it was just "promotional". You're a moron and I rue the day you get booted from Wikipedia or die. Apparently you're into some illegal behaviour involving children as per what's floating around on the forums. Lets hope you get doxxed. Spending all your days on Wikipedia like the fat greasy nerd you are. You have no friends and I seriously seriously can't wait till you die. Best wishes, everyone on Wikipedia who hates your lying ass. [[User:Zenomonoz|Zenomonoz]] ([[User talk:Zenomonoz#top|talk]]) 02:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:09, 14 November 2018

removed

Minor edits

Regarding your edit summary, I'm not aware that "Wikipedia demands up to date information". Could you please point me to the relevant guideline? Meanwhile, I would like to point your attention to Help:Minor edit. Do not mark your edits as minor when they are not, as by doing so, your edits may not show up on some editors' watchlists (you can suppress being shown minor edits). Schwede66 08:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carmel Fisher

Hello Zenomonoz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carmel Fisher for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

EROS message 10:29, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter and YouTube are not wp:reliable sources. See wp:NOTRS. Please use secondary or wp:tertiary sources for this. Such content may not use "Wikipedia's voice" That could make Wikipedia libel for slander. Someone must clearly state it in a wp:RS under editorial review. Then quote that source. See also wp:biographies of living persons (BLP) and wp:neutral point of view. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ELP

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jeffree Star. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Larnach-Castle-NZ-Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Larnach-Castle-NZ-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Bbb23 EXPOSED

Dear Bbb23, you have been EXPOSED. Lmfao I have never seen a mod ban people indefinitely for literally sourcing major news stories and then claiming it was just "promotional". You're a moron and I rue the day you get booted from Wikipedia or die. Apparently you're into some illegal behaviour involving children as per what's floating around on the forums. Lets hope you get doxxed. Spending all your days on Wikipedia like the fat greasy nerd you are. You have no friends and I seriously seriously can't wait till you die. Best wishes, everyone on Wikipedia who hates your lying ass. Zenomonoz (talk) 02:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]