Talk:Yumi Stynes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:23, 1 February 2019

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Australia: Television Stub‑class

	Australia portal Yumi Stynes is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Karl Quinn (2012-03-10). "The good, bad and ugly of social media". The Age.

Ethnicity

Shouldn't Polish, Jewish, and (presumably) Anglo-Saxon and Celtic be added to her ethnicity? Eligius (talk) 03:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, her religion should be Jewish as she is descended from Joseph Potaski144.137.9.157 (talk) 09:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sacked?

Can find no reference in the media anywhere that she has been sacked by Ch 10 - the noted reference only refers to Negus's show being axed and replaced which happened in 2011 and is not relevant to the current controversy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.53.222.20 (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 13 March 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Yumi Stynes also made the comment,'He must be a dud root', referring to Ben Roberts Smith IVF conception of twin girls.

210.9.189.54 (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 14:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For full quote and references see an earlier version: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yumi_Stynes&oldid=554202637 178.78.100.201 (talk) 19:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestra As 178.78.100.201 wrote see the references in the earlier version eg:

'I feel sick': Circle host shocked at backlash over 'dud root' comment February 29, 2012 Sydney Morning Herald

Negus says sorry for 'dud-root' remark Sydney Morning Herald, 1 March 2012

and hear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cENjKcBDg0Y

There is no need to explicitly tie in "He must be a dud root" to the interview the night before when Ben Roberts Smith mentioned IVF conception of twin girls, just the mention of the interview the night before and the crass remarks the next day and let the reader draw their own conclusions (Let the facts speak for themselves). -- PBS (talk)

-- PBS (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Yumi Stynes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ministerial condemnation

Hi Onetwothreeip, I urge you to rethink your objections to the inclusion of notable comments by a senior cabinet minister that were widely covered by the full spectrum of Australia's media, condemning an indefensible remark the Stynes herself was forced to appologiesed for. Additionally, you have reverted this on three occasions within the last 24 hours, I believe you must leave it for some time now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.6.69.2 (talk) 04:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC) - The ministers comments should be ignored, given they were based on widespread misreporting of critical facts (namely references to a war heroe's virility), as demonstrated by the cited apology of broadsheet newspaper publisher, Fairfax. . There is no need to slander Ms Stynes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:2724:500:11AD:22B1:E6A6:2F8A (talk) 04:25, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any sources that back that statement up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.6.69.2 (talk) 04:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the apology is cited in the previous text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:2724:500:11AD:22B1:E6A6:2F8A (talk) 04:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have sources linking Stephen Smith's condemnation of Stynes' indefensible comments (she never retracted her apology, so she remains contrite) to the incorrect reporting or the actual comments? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.6.69.2 (talk) 05:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Calling in Sick the Day After, Then Going on an Interview and Making a Cockroach Comment

All of that is undisputed and confirmed in a link to a solid source (The Perth Now). For an anonymous editor to dispute without explanation a fact widely reported in all newspapers in Australia, and remove in the name of that dispute not only that fact, but other, more important fact which is not even disputed by the editor and is actually the main point (a direct quote of the "cockroach" comment), is entirely unacceptable.

@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 Do you have sources linking Stephen Smith's condemnation of Stynes' indefensible comments (she never retracted her apology, so she remains contrite) to the incorrect reporting or the actual comments?  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/203.6.69.2|203.6.69.2]] ([[User talk:203.6.69.2#top|talk]]) 05:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Calling in Sick the Day After, Then Going on an Interview and Making a Cockroach Comment ==
+All of that is undisputed and confirmed in a link to a solid source (The Perth Now). For an anonymous editor to dispute without explanation a fact widely reported in all newspapers in Australia, and remove in the name of that dispute not only that fact, but other, more important fact which is not even disputed by the editor and is actually the main point (a direct quote of the "cockroach" comment), is entirely unacceptable.