Talk:Reed Smith: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:52, 5 February 2019

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pennsylvania Start‑class Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law Start‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pittsburgh Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move page. The possible ambiguity with Paul Reed Smith is now resolved with a hatnote ([1]), so there doesn't seem to be any other reason to diverge from the WP:NCCORP guidelines. GTBacchus^(talk) 22:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reed Smith → Reed Smith LLP —

This is the full name of the law firm. Sometimes the name of the firm is mistaken for Paul Reed Smith Guitars RebeccaBlaw (talk) 19:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NCCORP means that this in not uncontroversial. Dpmuk (talk) 19:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, based on the linked guideline. A hatnote such as {{distinguish}} can be used to resolve confusion between the two topics. Propaniac (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Puffery / COI

There have been repetitive edits to puff up the article. The article does not in it's current state adhere to Wikipedia's particularly neutral stance. Histnewbie (talk) 06:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposed changes

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Reed Smith. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Information to be added or removed: To the end of the History section please add – Also in 2018, Entertainment and Media Industry Group partner James Sully was named one of the top 25 lawyers of the year, according to Music Business UK and Centtrip Music’s Legal & Accountancy 50 almanac.

Explanation of issue: The section does not have the most up to date information on the firm and it’s employees.

References supporting change: ^[1]

Danainlondon (talk) 10:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

^ Ingham, Tim (4 December 2018). The Legal & Accountancy 50 2018 (PDF). London, United Kingdom: Music Business UK and Centtrip Music. Retrieved 29 January 2019.

[1] Ingham, Tim (4 December 2018). The Legal & Accountancy 50 2018 (PDF). London, United Kingdom: Music Business UK and Centtrip Music. Retrieved 29 January 2019.

[1]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 There have been repetitive edits to puff up the article. The article does not in it's current state adhere to Wikipedia's particularly neutral stance. [[User:Histnewbie|Histnewbie]] ([[User talk:Histnewbie|talk]]) 06:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
+==Some proposed changes==
+{{request edit}}
+Information to be added or removed: To the end of the History section please add – Also in 2018, Entertainment and Media Industry Group partner James Sully was named one of the top 25 lawyers of the year, according to Music Business UK and Centtrip Music’s Legal & Accountancy 50 almanac.
+Explanation of issue: The section does not have the most up to date information on the firm and it’s employees.
+References supporting change: <ref>{{cite book |last1=Ingham |first1=Tim |title=The Legal & Accountancy 50 2018 |date=4 December 2018 |publisher=Music Business UK and Centtrip Music |location=London, United Kingdom |url=https://media.centtrip.com/documents/L%26A50+book+2018_Final_Digital_LowRES.pdf?utm_source=Centtrip&utm_medium=press%20release&utm_campaign=Legal_Accountancy_50 |accessdate=29 January 2019}}</ref>
+[[User:Danainlondon|Danainlondon]] ([[User talk:Danainlondon|talk]]) 10:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)