Jump to content

User talk:Shofet tsaddiq: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Please do not post to my talk page Undid revision 883686803 by IamNotU (talk)
I put back warning, FF says I should not remove Undid revision 883686988 by Shofet tsaddiq (talk)
Line 32: Line 32:
:::I have urged you already to take it easy. That means in particular to not start edit warring as you just did on [[Pilaf]]. There are two primary spellings for the rice dish in the English language. In American English it is pilaf. In British and Commonwealth English it is pilau. WP has to give both. It does so on [[pajamas]], for example. I have given the detailed etymology as well as the two spellings in the Etymology section. It is cited to the premier historical dictionary of the English Language, the OED, which is not the same thing as a Learner's Dictionary. If something is cited in the main body of an article it is typically not cited in the lead. That is why it was not cited, though I could easily cite it again. All the other spellings are not English language spellings. Please reinstate my last version. [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 22:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
:::I have urged you already to take it easy. That means in particular to not start edit warring as you just did on [[Pilaf]]. There are two primary spellings for the rice dish in the English language. In American English it is pilaf. In British and Commonwealth English it is pilau. WP has to give both. It does so on [[pajamas]], for example. I have given the detailed etymology as well as the two spellings in the Etymology section. It is cited to the premier historical dictionary of the English Language, the OED, which is not the same thing as a Learner's Dictionary. If something is cited in the main body of an article it is typically not cited in the lead. That is why it was not cited, though I could easily cite it again. All the other spellings are not English language spellings. Please reinstate my last version. [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 22:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
::::Sorry, I think you have me confused with the editor who added the content. You are making something simple into a protracted problem - the use of ''pilau'' as a synonym for ''pilaf'' requires a more substantial explanation because ''pilau'' is used also for the Afghan dish ''pilau'' which is not the same as ''paella'' (to take an obvious example). The issue is that this was impossible to decipher from reading the article, a situation that is not helped by blaming the existing problems of the article on new editors. The problems were already there when I started editing. I also don't know which version you would want me to reinstate, I thought this was added by the IP. [[User:Shofet tsaddiq|Shofet tsaddiq]] ([[User talk:Shofet tsaddiq#top|talk]]) 23:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
::::Sorry, I think you have me confused with the editor who added the content. You are making something simple into a protracted problem - the use of ''pilau'' as a synonym for ''pilaf'' requires a more substantial explanation because ''pilau'' is used also for the Afghan dish ''pilau'' which is not the same as ''paella'' (to take an obvious example). The issue is that this was impossible to decipher from reading the article, a situation that is not helped by blaming the existing problems of the article on new editors. The problems were already there when I started editing. I also don't know which version you would want me to reinstate, I thought this was added by the IP. [[User:Shofet tsaddiq|Shofet tsaddiq]] ([[User talk:Shofet tsaddiq#top|talk]]) 23:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

== February 2019 ==
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Shawarma]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:IamNotU|IamNotU]] ([[User talk:IamNotU|talk]]) 23:18, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:10, 17 February 2019

Welcome!

Hello, Shofet tsaddiq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Epipelagic (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this welcome! I have tried a new image on shrimp that I hope you will like. If not, maybe we can come to an agreement about a new image? I have opened a discussion on the talk page. Thank you again for kind welcome.Shofet tsaddiq (talk) 01:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Kebab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Gyro and Pide
Armenian Genocide recognition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to European

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

I know you are champing at the bit to make your contributions, and that is a good thing. But there is a flip side. If we jump into waters deeper than we are ready for, we lose our energy just as quickly, and drop out. I don't want that to happen to you. The trick to avoiding doing that is to start with small edits here and there, to make your user's page, to tell us what your interests are and why you are on Wikipedia, to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia guidelines, and, in general, to start unobtrusively. This is my advice, spoken from experience. All the best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this advice. I am happy to discuss more on the talk page if you think there is some problem with my edits I will try to fix it. I will make a user's page, thank you.Shofet tsaddiq (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Encyclopedic writing takes time. It is better to ramp up on unobtrusive pages. It is not something you can learn by prolifically editing highly trafficked articles, though editing them occasionally for small fixes is a good way as well. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 23:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have urged you already to take it easy. That means in particular to not start edit warring as you just did on Pilaf. There are two primary spellings for the rice dish in the English language. In American English it is pilaf. In British and Commonwealth English it is pilau. WP has to give both. It does so on pajamas, for example. I have given the detailed etymology as well as the two spellings in the Etymology section. It is cited to the premier historical dictionary of the English Language, the OED, which is not the same thing as a Learner's Dictionary. If something is cited in the main body of an article it is typically not cited in the lead. That is why it was not cited, though I could easily cite it again. All the other spellings are not English language spellings. Please reinstate my last version. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I think you have me confused with the editor who added the content. You are making something simple into a protracted problem - the use of pilau as a synonym for pilaf requires a more substantial explanation because pilau is used also for the Afghan dish pilau which is not the same as paella (to take an obvious example). The issue is that this was impossible to decipher from reading the article, a situation that is not helped by blaming the existing problems of the article on new editors. The problems were already there when I started editing. I also don't know which version you would want me to reinstate, I thought this was added by the IP. Shofet tsaddiq (talk) 23:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Shawarma shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. IamNotU (talk) 23:18, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]