User talk:Kimchi.sg: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:53, 23 November 2006

User:Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh/User page banner

Thanks.

Thanks a lot, you deleted an article for not having much info WHILE I was adding a bunch of new things. I really appreciate that.— Preceding unsigned comment added by J-Head (talk • contribs)

Resysopping??!

Yeah baby! Woohoo! Glen 07:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now let's see if any 'crats are online. :D Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 07:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Good to see you back around! You're a superstar at clearing backlogs; wish I could live up to your numbers -- Samir धर्म 04:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And from me too. Kavadi had me fooled on those RfAs. And congrats on the userpage. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's better. - crz crztalk 04:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's "that" referring to? My user page? :-) Kimchi.sg 04:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noah Lindsey Cyrus

Maybe you and I read the article differently. I saw four episodes, and unnamed roles that looked like she was an extra. Fan-1967 05:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I missed the mention of her father's show, and IMDB says she actually is a named character there. Fan-1967 05:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff moved from your userpage

Hi,

You have deleted our shool webpage and I am very unhappy about this. I would like to know why you felt this necessary considering we have the rights to all content from www.bisc.krakow.pl as it is our web page. And secondly could you please restore this ASAP.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreasHuntley (talk • contribs)

Specifying which article would be appreciated, thanks. MER-C 09:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, it's British International School of Cracow. Kimchi.sg 09:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Sorry about that. We as a school are still learning about your website. Can you please unprotect the page so that we can edit it in the future.

regards

Andy Huntley— Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreasHuntley (talk • contribs)

Request for undeletion of Context Sensitive Solutions

Hello,

I would like to request undeletion of the article on Context Sensitive Solutions. Here is the reasoning behind my request, which I also posted to the discussion page for the article:

"This article was deleted for a supposed copyright violation. However, the material in question is in the public domain. The lists that appear under the sections "Qualities of a CSS Project" and "CSS Principles" are generally agreed upon by transportation planners as defining the practice of Context Sensitive Solutions. They were originally produced at a conference sponsored by the state of Maryland Department of Transportation in 1998 and have since been reproduced online in several forums, including The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Carter and Burgess (a private firm), and dozens more that can be produced with a Google search of "Qualities of Excellence in Transportation Design."

"In light of the consensus that has emerged around these principles (Federal legislation has referred to them as design criteria for the federal highway system, see SAFETEA-LU, Section 109.c.2.C), I believe it is justified and necessary to include them in this article. I have altered the citation format to make it clearer that the lists are not my words, and I re-directed the reference to point to the original document on the Maryland State Highway Administration website.

"Also, there is other material in this article besides those lists, which I believe should preclude full deletion."

Thanks for considering this request.

--Hobisfried 16:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your courteous reply. I appreciate your rigorous standards and welcome your suggestions. I realize that I have not met the burden of proof, and I would like your help understanding what conditions must be met to either prove that I have permission to use this material or prove that it is in the public domain. Since the source document is a PDF on the Maryland State Highway Administration website, would confirmation from a representative of that public agency be sufficient? I've already reviewed many pages pertaining to copyright protocol on Wikipedia, but I hope you'll be able to give an authoritative answer that will allow me to pursue a course of action free from doubt.

I understand that the most reasonable thing to do would be to find another way to convey the same ideas. However, the reason I'm resisting re-wording the disputed text is because my colleagues in the transportation planning field firmly believe this particular phrasing is intrinsic to the meaning of the term. Perhaps that stance is contrary to the very nature of Wikiedia, but I am trying to explore all available options to preserve the disputed wording before going another route.

I'm also curious as to why the entire article was deleted when the disputed text was only a portion of the whole. Is it possible to restore the remainder of the article?

Thanks again for your assistance.

--Hobisfried 04:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, thanks for your work expanding British International School of Cracow. Looks like you saved it from being deleted again – Gurch 21:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (once again)

Ah, that never occurred to me. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll be sure to check that in the future. —Chowbok ☠ 01:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toxic Pijin

it is insulting that an article for a notable do it yourself band {I.E a none signed band that has been on three tours thus far including a european one,} such as the pijin can not be added to wikipedia. Yet I see many inifinitely more pointless articles littering the server that don't deserve to be here. The moderation of this site is bigoted and hypocritical in nature. I propose you allow this article to be recreated and I shall spend a little more time adding images and information so you can see that this act are actually notable and unlike your pre conconceptions not a piece of petty trivia.. Toxic Pijin have been around for three years they have a wide cult fanbase in both europe and England. They have produced four albums in this time period I am very insulted by the fact I create a user name, log in, start to create and article and it is deleted twice and before I can add my coding to it you decide to protect it so I cannot recreate it again and add my further editing. Also I find it very hypocritical to send me a message claiming I am not contributing when in all fairness I have tried to contribute but you have deleted it twice!

I apologise for swearing at you I was merely making a point not everyone has the time you do on your hands and I would appreciate it if you would consider that

thanks

Craigus— Preceding unsigned comment added by Swallowthemind (talk • contribs)

Ok I shall get back to you when it is ready thank you— Preceding unsigned comment added by Swallowthemind (talk • contribs)

re: toxic pijin I notice that I can claim the completed article as notable under point 3 . Criteria for musicians and ensembles - Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country,[1] reported in notable and verifiable sources. "There are, at present, no precise definitions of a "small", "medium" or "large" country in this context. However, a very limited definition of "small" will generally be used, excluding only a few of the world's smallest countries."

I therefore propose I produce links to reviews of their european tour last year and a scan of their media coverage. I have several reviews of their recent england "Oberon gisepe wemblequest" tour. I would also like to add that no other band in the world throws bread, brocoli, dog food at their audience and no other band has the balls to throw tabasco sauce in their eyes and express their pain through feedback and anger.. I am also sure no other band has songs about the number 27, tea breaks, ikea and preaching teachers who tell you to "get in the cupboard with jesus and think about what you've done". I admit I have a hard task ahead to convice you but they are worthy of inclusion due to the fact by their very nature the toxic pijin go out of their way to offend everyone. Excuse my spelling errors this keyboard is in poor condition. I shall get in touch— Preceding unsigned comment added by Swallowthemind (talk • contribs)

Amityville Horror theme music

I re-uploaded [1] as for some reason it was coming up as an orphaned file. The link from the article The Amityville Horror is now working.--Ianmacm 21:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Deletion project...

Thanks! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 14:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You recently tagged Image:DisneyAfternoonGang.jpg with {{no rationale}}. However, the tag is only applicable to images which were uploaded after 2006-05-04. This image was uploaded 2005-07-28. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 03:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What a surprise...

...to see your name in the deletion log. Glad you never gave up trying for the bit. :-) Kimchi.sg 06:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. (By the way, your username change is going to be quite confusing). -- tariqabjotu 06:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Publimedia International

You deleted Publimedia International as {{csd-g11}}, which it was. However, I think the company is a notable Romanian publishing company, and it would be helpful if you could restore the article and turn it into something NPOV, if necessary by turning it into a stub. I wasn't the original author, but I was trying to expand another article written by the same author and saw your note on the user's talk page about the deletion of Publimedia International. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 14:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't start the article for scratch, since I don't know much about Romanian magazines. Could you restore that article, together with ProTV Magazin, Ce se intampla, doctore?, and DESCOPERA to my user space so that I can work on them there? --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 17:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subiaco Marist Cricket Club

Jeffrey,

Thank you for the feedback (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subiaco_Marist_Cricket_Club, Nov 15). It is fair that the reader shouldn't have to take the author's word for it when the words "renowned" and "notable" are used. As such, these assertions have now been backed up by references to the 24 state championships claimed by the club and the 11 SMCC players who have represented their countries at the highest level. In terms of achievement and contribution to the sport of cricket, these criteria are more reliable than the number of Google entries.

Regards,

Richard Somerville— Preceding unsigned comment added by Somerof69 (talk • contribs)

Coffee Lounge MfD

Why was the Coffee Lounge deleted after only one day of votes? There's supposed to be about five days worth. Al e thiophile¹2₃ 18:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not protesting the deletion of the Coffee Lounge per se. I am protesting the unfairness of the MfD. It should not have been closed so quickly. I will request undeletion and a full, fair MfD. I will then go along with the result of that. Al e thiophile¹2₃ 02:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Several issues

Are you coming for the meetup on 24 November? Please do reconfirm your attendance at the meetup, as you told me that you are not going months ago. Regarding the AFD on Woodlands Civic Centre, please do consider merging the article into Woodlands, Singapore as this place is quite a huge building in a regional centre. Houses Woodlands Regional Library and other government facilities as well as shops. So do reconsider changing to merge it to salvage the article. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 03:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to help doing some assesment for Singapore-related articles? There's a page on how to do it, check the notice board and its subpages for more details. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 04:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have confronted my friends already. It will NOT happen in the next six weeks, and see how it goes. Those are in my personal userpage, and I will sort it out with them if that happens again. I don't want to go any further as my blood is boiling now because of some things that happened today. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 10:41, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Libellous statements

There was a personal attack on the Arcadia 2001 discussion page. These statements are libellous and quite simply are lies. I notice you reverted the cleanup, why do this!? 211.31.127.128 18:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not spam

Sending a note to all users who participated in an earlier AfD does not seem to fall afoul of WP:SPAM. I have therefore restored the messages. JoshuaZ 06:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you JoshuaZ. My intention was definitely not to spam anyone, but W.marsh's initial concern was that those who had voted Keep in the first round didn't know about the second, and the agreement we had apparently reached involved notifying them (thus my comment to Awyong and the two others). When the nomination went up a third time on procedural grounds, I thought it was only fair to re-notify the Delete votes as well. Believe me, I understand very well that it's bad form to go out soliciting for votes, and totally unacceptable to do it on random User_talk pages, but that wasn't what I was doing in this case (nor would I ever). --Arvedui 09:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I meant to say thank you to you, AJMS, for taking the time in setting up and listing the third nomination after my mistaken re-opening of the second one (a miscommunication between myself and W.marsh). Thanks! --Arvedui

untitled/unknown

Hi Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh....uh... why did you delete this page? --(this unsigned comment was made by 68.121.111.129 on 09:23, 20 November 2006 )

Vangelis & In the Heavyskies

Hiya, I have just noticed that you speedily deleted Vangelis (Buffyverse) & User:Mets501 speedily deleted In the Heavyskies (WP:AfD/Vangelis & WP:AfD/In the Heavyskies). I can see that at present they are not very notable since they are unlikely to see the light of day until at least 2007, and even then it will remain to be seen if they are covered by some notable sources. Would it be possible for the article to be put onto my user space:

User:Paxomen/In the Heavyskies, User:Paxomen/Vangelis (Buffyverse)

I put a lot of work into the articles, researching them on the web and writing them, and would be interested in using my work, on a Buffy wiki (e.g. http://buffy.wikia.com/wiki/Buffyverse_Wiki).

I would have saved the content myself for use elsewhere, but I was never informed about the deletions. Please could you help out.

Thanks -- Paxomen 17:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers tagged by sockpuppet vandal

Please be more careful when deleting images tagged with {{no source}}. A number of album cover images were tagged "no source" by a sockpuppet vandal User:Aujin66, but for the most part the source of an album cover is obviously the album from which it came. See the discussion here. If you could restore these images it would be much appreciated. The following is a list of just some of the images... the majority of images deleted on 19 November were probably similar, and between 200 and 250 were tagged by the sockpuppet on 11 November.

DHowell 23:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for restoring these images. DHowell 20:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Thanks for the note about the template, though it took me awhile to figure out what you meant, as I wasn't involved in its creation at all, merely providing an unwitting source for it. --Calton | Talk 00:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WiktionaryZ on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of WiktionaryZ. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. Andres 01:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Movementarian's RfA

Thank you for taking the time to comment on my RfA. I appreciate your input and although I would like to be successful this attempt, you have a very valid point. Movementarian (Talk) 14:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

張圭陽

Hello. I notice you speedily kept 張圭陽. I just speedily deleted it, on the basis that WP:PNT aren't going to do anything with it, because Cheung kwai yeung (itself likely to be deleted) was already an English version of it. If my reading of the article is wrong or you disagree with this, please feel free to restore. Morwen - Talk 17:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of IRED page

Dear Salleh, I was not sure why my page( Iqbal international institute for research, education and dialgoue was deleted and protected by you. Can you please give me some information reagrding that. I will appreciate an early reply.Thanks

Notable issue ???

thanks for your speedy reply, what i gathered from your reply is that the article was deleted because it does not show how the group is notable. well this page is about a think tank opertaing from paksitan and having President of paksitan as its Patron in Chief. and the institute is headed by world famous femenist theologian Dr.Riffat Hassan. I am yet in a process of adding the things and you have deleted it. i think first there should be some history of Institute and the purpose why this institute has been eastablished and after that we can add who is running it. An early reply will be highly appreciated again