Revision as of 00:03, 13 June 2019

WP:ARC

Requests for arbitration

Request name	Motions	Initiated	Votes
Restoration of admin permissions to Floquenbeam by WJBscribe		13 June 2019	0/0/0

[edit]

Open cases

Case name	Links	Evidence due	Prop. Dec. due
Historical elections	(t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t)	20 Aug 2024	03 Sep 2024

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Request name	Motions	Case	Posted
Amendment request: Definition of the "area of conflict" Clause 4 (b)	none	none	26 July 2024
Clarification request: Appeal methods for Lima Bean Farmer topic ban	none	none	12 August 2024
Amendment request: German war effort	none	(orig. case)	13 August 2024

Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

Shortcuts

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.

File an arbitration request

This page is for statements, not discussion.

If you must reply to another user's statement, do so in your own section (more information).
Your section must not contain more than 500 words (Word Count Tool; internal gadget). This includes your replies to other users. To request an extension, either make the request in your statement section or email the clerks email list.
Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, e.g. off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
Declined case requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

Restoration of admin permissions to Floquenbeam by WJBscribe

Initiated by WJBscribe (talk) at 00:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

WJBscribe (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), filing party
WMFOffice (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

[diff of notification WMFOffice]

Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#Resysop request (Floq)
Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram

Statement by WJBscribe

I restored the admin permissions of Floquenbeam (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), which were not removed through a community process or as a result of a ruling by ArbCom. My reasons for doing so are stated in this post. I refer this action to ArbCom for review and scrutiny. I will of course accept any sanction that ArbCom judges appropriate.

Statement by WMFOffice

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

Restoration of admin permissions to Floquenbeam by WJBscribe: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Restoration of admin permissions to Floquenbeam by WJBscribe: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 <noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}}
 {{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=45%</noinclude>}}
+== Restoration of admin permissions to Floquenbeam by WJBscribe ==
+'''Initiated by ''' <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:WJBscribe|WJBscribe]] [[User talk:WJBscribe|(talk)]]</strong> '''at''' 00:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
+=== Involved parties ===
+<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator -->
+*{{admin|WJBscribe}}, ''filing party''
+*{{userlinks|WMFOffice}}
+;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
+<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
+*[diff of notification WMFOffice]
+;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
+[[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#Resysop request (Floq)]]<br/>[[Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram]]
+=== Statement by WJBscribe ===
+I restored the admin permissions of {{admin|Floquenbeam}}, which were not removed through a community process or as a result of a ruling by ArbCom. My reasons for doing so are stated in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ABureaucrats%27_noticeboard&type=revision&diff=901594097&oldid=901569479 this post]. I refer this action to ArbCom for review and scrutiny. I will of course accept any sanction that ArbCom judges appropriate.
+=== Statement by WMFOffice ===
+=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
+Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
+<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->
+=== Restoration of admin permissions to Floquenbeam by WJBscribe: Clerk notes ===
+:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
+*
+=== Restoration of admin permissions to Floquenbeam by WJBscribe: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> ===
+{{anchor|1=Restoration of admin permissions to Floquenbeam by WJBscribe: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
+*