Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angband: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Angband: added a comment |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Delete''' - Sources are not present to establish notability. Who cares about in-universe relevance? That has never had to do with Notability as defined on Wikipedia. That's a complete Wikia-like attitude. If sources are not present, then this is not notable. If sources are present, it's notable. If it's notable, provide sources. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 12:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - Sources are not present to establish notability. Who cares about in-universe relevance? That has never had to do with Notability as defined on Wikipedia. That's a complete Wikia-like attitude. If sources are not present, then this is not notable. If sources are present, it's notable. If it's notable, provide sources. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 12:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Note''': If this gets deleted, replace it with a disambig page as both [[Angband (video game)]] and [[Angband (band)]] exist. [[User:JIP|<span style="color: #CC0000;">J</span><span style="color: #00CC00;">I</span><span style="color: #0000CC;">P</span>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 15:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Note''': If this gets deleted, replace it with a disambig page as both [[Angband (video game)]] and [[Angband (band)]] exist. [[User:JIP|<span style="color: #CC0000;">J</span><span style="color: #00CC00;">I</span><span style="color: #0000CC;">P</span>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 15:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' due to the existence of sources that establishes notability. Who cares if anyone doesn't like this material? --[[Special:Contributions/131.123.51.67|131.123.51.67]] ([[User talk:131.123.51.67|talk]]) 15:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:30, 22 November 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Angband (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication this fictional location passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary. Deprodded by User:Necrothesp with "significant location in Tolkien's work", which is sadly not a valid AfD argument, you'll have to try a bit better here. TIA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Yes, it is indeed a valid argument. A very significant location in the works of one of the most famous authors in the English language. Clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Sources are not present to establish notability. Who cares about in-universe relevance? That has never had to do with Notability as defined on Wikipedia. That's a complete Wikia-like attitude. If sources are not present, then this is not notable. If sources are present, it's notable. If it's notable, provide sources. TTN (talk) 12:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: If this gets deleted, replace it with a disambig page as both Angband (video game) and Angband (band) exist. JIP | Talk 15:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep due to the existence of sources that establishes notability. Who cares if anyone doesn't like this material? --131.123.51.67 (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)