Jump to content

Talk:Wolf Amendment: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.7.1)
Line 30: Line 30:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:03, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:03, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

== China, Russia and ‘Europe’. ==

Europe is now a nation ? Not a continent? What is the capital of Europe? What kind of government has it? What is its flag and national song ?

Russia is now a nation? Not a federation of states ?

Please explain.

Revision as of 07:15, 25 November 2019

WikiProject iconSpaceflight Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChina Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

October 2013

I have not been able to find any reliable source of the "March 2013" law that "prohibits anyone from China setting foot in a NASA building", and every source I've found has led back to the Guardian article. I believe the Guardian article is erroneously referring to an incident in March 2013 when Frank Wolf contacted NASA administrator Charles Bolden about a possible violation of the April 2011 law. If I am correct, then the "new" 2013 law is actually the 2011 law. I will be removing the wikipedia article's mentions of the possibly-fictitious 2013 law; I would encourage anyone with a citation of the actual 2013 law, if it exists, to restore them. 18.95.7.68 (talk) 20:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now found this, passed in March 2013, but the language in that law is substantially the same as in the 2011 law (main difference is that NASA must notify Congress 30 days in advance instead of 14), and in particular doesn't make any mention of Chinese nationals being forbidden from setting foot in NASA buildings. I won't make further changes to the article at this point. 18.95.5.40 (talk) 00:54, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I also see no reference in the source cited claiming that Chinese nationals aren't allowed in NASA facilities. I do see a prohibition on bilateral negotiations with Chinese companies and government agencies. Geogene (talk) 20:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If that were really the law, considering there is a link to the law right there, someone should have no trouble finding it. With that in mind I fixed it. Geogene (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source for the Name

Are there reliable sources that actually call this the Chinese Exclusion Policy, or was that moniker created here? I also find the "See Also" link to the Chinese Exclusion Act to be hyperbolic and in poor taste. How exactly are these related? Geogene (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think this moniker stems from a sort of victim mentality which happens to be prevalent among many Chinese people who believe in the propaganda from Chinese Communist government by saying that the westerners always humiliate and demonize us. In other words, it is a result of brain-wash.--HaanTang (talk) 19:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Response

In the lede the article says that funding is not available to Chinese citizens due to an act passed in 2011, yet the response section talks about the cooperation between China and Russia from the mid 2000s. What is the correlation between these? Not seeing any sources that show one lead from the other. PaintedCarpet (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chinese exclusion policy of NASA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

China, Russia and ‘Europe’.

Europe is now a nation ? Not a continent? What is the capital of Europe? What kind of government has it? What is its flag and national song ?

Russia is now a nation? Not a federation of states ?

Please explain.