Jump to content

Saurabh Kalia: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Efforts by family: remove - this is a comment from years ago and the section gains nothing from it now
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
Line 40: Line 40:
Kalia's family has tried to get justice for the alleged war crimes committed against their son and his patrol.<ref name=hindu_parent>{{cite news|title=Saurabh Kalia's parents waging a lone battle to highlight war crimes|url=http://www.hindu.com/2009/07/06/stories/2009070655650700.htm|accessdate=29 March 2012|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=6 July 2009}}</ref> Kalia's father wants the alleged acts to be declared a war crime by the United Nations and the people responsible to be punished in accordance with the Geneva Convention.<ref name=hillpost/> However, he stated that he has failed to achieve this despite “shuttling between various government offices and organisations."
Kalia's family has tried to get justice for the alleged war crimes committed against their son and his patrol.<ref name=hindu_parent>{{cite news|title=Saurabh Kalia's parents waging a lone battle to highlight war crimes|url=http://www.hindu.com/2009/07/06/stories/2009070655650700.htm|accessdate=29 March 2012|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|date=6 July 2009}}</ref> Kalia's father wants the alleged acts to be declared a war crime by the United Nations and the people responsible to be punished in accordance with the Geneva Convention.<ref name=hillpost/> However, he stated that he has failed to achieve this despite “shuttling between various government offices and organisations."


"I am ashamed of being an Indian. The country has spineless leaders," said N. K. Kalia. "Though the then Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led National Democratic Alliance government at the Centre expressed concern over the heinous crime and promised to take up the issue at the international level, in all these years the issue got diluted,” he recalled. He also started an online signature campaign to highlight the plight of the war victims.<ref name=hindu_parent/>
"I am ashamed of being an Indian. The country has spineless leaders," said N. K. Kalia. "Though the then Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led National Democratic Alliance government at the Centre expressed concern over the heinous crime and promised to take up the issue at the international level, in all these years the issue got diluted,” he recalled. He also started an online petition to highlight the plight of the war victims.<ref name=hindu_parent/>


Kalia's father approached various national and international organisations to put pressure on Pakistan to identify and punish the persons allegedly responsible.<ref name=hillpost>{{cite news |last=Sood|first=Ravinder |title=Seven years, Captain Kalia's family still waiting for justice |url=http://hillpost.in/2008/03/21/seven-years-captain-kalias-family-waits-for-justice/4890/more2/activism/rsood |accessdate=29 March 2012 |date=21 March 2008}}</ref><ref name=cnn-ibn>{{cite news |title=CJ takes on India, Pak govts over torture of Kargil hero |url=http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/58607/cj-takes-on-indian-pak-govts-over-armymans-torture.html |accessdate=29 March 2012 |newspaper=CNN-IBN |date=10 February 2008}}</ref> As of 2004, Britain had responded by saying that it had unsuccessfully sought a full report from the Indian army, while Israel noted it had no diplomatic relations with Pakistan. Germany said it had no response to enquiries made to the Ministry of External Affairs, and Pakistan rejected the allegations.<ref name="rediff">{{cite web|url=https://m.rediff.com/news/2004/jun/07karg4.htm|title=Kargil first hero|accessdate=30 August 2019|work=Rediff}}</ref>
Kalia's father approached various national and international organisations to put pressure on Pakistan to identify and punish the persons allegedly responsible.<ref name=hillpost>{{cite news |last=Sood|first=Ravinder |title=Seven years, Captain Kalia's family still waiting for justice |url=http://hillpost.in/2008/03/21/seven-years-captain-kalias-family-waits-for-justice/4890/more2/activism/rsood |accessdate=29 March 2012 |date=21 March 2008}}</ref><ref name=cnn-ibn>{{cite news |title=CJ takes on India, Pak govts over torture of Kargil hero |url=http://ibnlive.in.com/videos/58607/cj-takes-on-indian-pak-govts-over-armymans-torture.html |accessdate=29 March 2012 |newspaper=CNN-IBN |date=10 February 2008}}</ref> As of 2004, Britain had responded by saying that it had unsuccessfully sought a full report from the Indian army, while Israel noted it had no diplomatic relations with Pakistan. Germany said it had no response to enquiries made to the Ministry of External Affairs, and Pakistan rejected the allegations.<ref name="rediff">{{cite web|url=https://m.rediff.com/news/2004/jun/07karg4.htm|title=Kargil first hero|accessdate=30 August 2019|work=Rediff}}</ref>


N. K. Kalia's petition was pursued by [[Rajeev Chandrasekhar]], (MP) who wrote to the External Affairs Minister and raised questions in Parliament on why the Government has not taken up the case of Capt Saurabh Kalia with the UNHRC, to declare this act a war crime, identify, and punish all the perpetrators. In response to a question raised by Chandrasekhar, Defence Minister A. K. Antony wrote to Capt Kalia's parents in October 2013 that India was bound by the [[Simla Agreement]], and any differences with Pakistan will be settled bilaterally.<ref name="surrenders">{{cite news| title=Govt surrenders to Pakistan on Kargil hero| url=http://in.news.yahoo.com/govt-surrenders-to-pakistan-on-kargil-hero-031717597.html| accessdate=20 November 2013| date=20 November 2013| publisher=Mail Today}}</ref>
N. K. Kalia's petition was pursued by the MP [[Rajeev Chandrasekhar]], who wrote to the External Affairs Minister and raised questions in Parliament as to why the Government had not taken up the case with the [[United Nations Human Rights Council]] (UNHRC). In response, Defence Minister [[A. K. Antony]] wrote to Kalia's parents in October 2013 that India was bound by the [[Simla Agreement]], and any differences with Pakistan would be settled bilaterally.<ref name="surrenders">{{cite news| title=Govt surrenders to Pakistan on Kargil hero| url=http://in.news.yahoo.com/govt-surrenders-to-pakistan-on-kargil-hero-031717597.html| accessdate=20 November 2013| date=20 November 2013| publisher=Mail Today}}</ref>


"In order to declare a war crime, the Ministry of Defence needs to write to the Ministry of External Affairs, which then takes up the matter with the UNHRC. The council then refers the matter to the General Assembly, which can declare war crime. It then goes to the international court of justice (ICJ). It is the ministry of external affairs that did not follow up the case with the UN" said Colonel (retd) S. K. Aggarwal, former [[Judge Advocate General (India)|Judge Advocate General]] (JAG) officer.<ref name=rediff_firsthero>{{cite news |title=Lest We Forget, Kargil's first hero |url=http://specials.rediff.com/news/2004/jun/07kalia.htm |accessdate=29 March 2012 |newspaper=Rediff news |date=7 June 2004}}</ref><ref name=toi_torture>{{cite news |title=Capt Saurabh Kalia's torture by Pak army still not 'war crime' |url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-06-09/chandigarh/28320000_1_war-crime-pakistan-army-torture |accessdate=29 March 2012 |newspaper=[[The Times of India]] |date=9 June 2010}}</ref> An affidavit filed by the External Affairs ministry in November 2013, said that "moving the ICJ is not a legally enforceable right" and that Pakistan may not permit India submitting a proposal to ICJ.<ref name="surrenders"/>
"In order to declare a war crime, the Ministry of Defence needs to write to the Ministry of External Affairs, which then takes up the matter with the UNHRC. The council then refers the matter to the General Assembly, which can declare war crime. It then goes to the international court of justice (ICJ). It is the ministry of external affairs that did not follow up the case with the UN" said Colonel S. K. Aggarwal, a former [[Judge Advocate General (India)|Judge Advocate General]] officer.<ref name=rediff_firsthero>{{cite news |title=Lest We Forget, Kargil's first hero |url=http://specials.rediff.com/news/2004/jun/07kalia.htm |accessdate=29 March 2012 |newspaper=Rediff news |date=7 June 2004}}</ref> An affidavit filed by the External Affairs ministry in November 2013, said that "moving the ICJ is not a legally enforceable right" and that Pakistan may not permit India submitting a proposal to ICJ.<ref name="surrenders"/>


[[Indian Army]] Chief [[General Bikram Singh]] has also supported the efforts of Saurabh Kalia's father. He reportedly wrote to the Ministry of Defence and National Human Rights Commission conveying his concerns in the matter.<ref>{{cite web|title=General Bikram Singh extends Support to Family of Kargil Hero Capt. Kalia|url=http://news.biharprabha.com/2012/11/general-bikram-singh-extends-support-to-family-of-kargil-hero-capt-kalia/|work=IANS|publisher=Biharprabha News}}</ref>
Indian Army Chief [[General Bikram Singh]] reportedly supported the efforts of Kalia's father by writing to the Ministry of Defence and National Human Rights Commission conveying his concerns.<ref>{{cite web|title=General Bikram Singh extends Support to Family of Kargil Hero Capt. Kalia|url=http://news.biharprabha.com/2012/11/general-bikram-singh-extends-support-to-family-of-kargil-hero-capt-kalia/|work=IANS|publisher=Biharprabha News}}</ref>


N. K. Kalia, along with Rajeev Chandrasekhar, and the Flags of Honour Foundation, (an organisation dedicated to building ceaseless engagement between society and the families of martyrs), filed a petition with the [[United Nations Human Rights Council]] (UNHRC) against war crimes and the torture inflicted on Lt Saurabh Kalia and the five [[jawans]] by Pakistani forces during the Kargil War in 1999. The petition was filed on 7 December 2012, with [[Juan E. Méndez]], Special Rapporteur on Torture, of the Office of High Commissioner of Human Rights in Geneva.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/report/captain-kalias-father-takes-fight-for-justice-to-un/20121211.htm| title=Captain Kalia's father takes fight for justice to UN |author=Vicky Nanappa |date=11 December 2012 |accessdate=19 May 2013 |publisher=rediff}}</ref> The Indian External Affairs Ministry said it would look at the nature of the petition, as the UNHRC is an inter-state body and usually acts only in terms of initiatives taken by its member states.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://m.indianexpress.com/news/kargil-hero-saurabh-kalias-father-approaches-unhrc/1043766/| title=Kargil hero Lt Saurabh Kalia's father approaches UNHRC| date=11 December 2012| accessdate=19 May 2013| publisher=rediff}}</ref>
N. K. Kalia, along with Chandrasekhar, and the Flags of Honour Foundation, (an organisation dedicated to building ceaseless engagement between society and the families of killed soldiers), filed a petition with the UNHRC against war crimes and the torture inflicted on Lt Saurabh Kalia and the five [[jawans]] by Pakistani forces during the Kargil War in 1999. The petition was filed on 7 December 2012, with [[Juan E. Méndez]], Special Rapporteur on Torture, of the Office of High Commissioner of Human Rights in Geneva.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/report/captain-kalias-father-takes-fight-for-justice-to-un/20121211.htm| title=Captain Kalia's father takes fight for justice to UN |author=Vicky Nanappa |date=11 December 2012 |accessdate=19 May 2013 |publisher=rediff}}</ref> The Indian External Affairs Ministry said it would look at the nature of the petition, as the UNHRC is an inter-state body and usually acts only in terms of initiatives taken by its member states.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://m.indianexpress.com/news/kargil-hero-saurabh-kalias-father-approaches-unhrc/1043766/| title=Kargil hero Lt Saurabh Kalia's father approaches UNHRC| date=11 December 2012| accessdate=19 May 2013| publisher=rediff}}</ref>


Following the formation of the [[First Modi ministry|Narendra Modi ministry]], the Supreme Court took up [[public interest litigation]] (PIL) in September 2014, filed by N. K. Kalia and Sarwa Mitter, and asked the Centre to file an affidavit within six weeks. The Court wanted to know the stand of the new regime, and wondered why the government had not approached the International Court of Justice.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-bring-back-indian-pows-in-pakistan/article6439815.ece| title=Bring back Indian PoWs in Pakistan, says apex court| date=24 September 2014| publisher=The Hindu}}</ref> The government's affidavit filed in the Supreme Court listed the measures taken by the previous UPA government, and did not list out any proposed steps by the NDA government. The affidavit challenged the petition saying a PIL cannot seek action against a foreign country, and that foreign policy is a government function.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/beheading-at-loc-poll-over-nda-backs-what-upa-did/| title=Beheading at LoC: Poll over, NDA backs what UPA did| publisher=Indian Express| author=Utkarsh Anand| date=12 December 2014}}</ref>
Following the formation of the [[First Modi ministry|Narendra Modi ministry]], the Supreme Court took up [[public interest litigation]] (PIL) in September 2014, filed by N. K. Kalia and Sarwa Mitter, and asked the Centre to file an affidavit within six weeks. The Court wanted to know the stand of the new regime, and wondered why the government had not approached the International Court of Justice.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-bring-back-indian-pows-in-pakistan/article6439815.ece| title=Bring back Indian PoWs in Pakistan, says apex court| date=24 September 2014| publisher=The Hindu}}</ref> The government's affidavit filed in the Supreme Court listed the measures taken by the previous UPA government, and did not list out any proposed steps by the NDA government. The affidavit challenged the petition saying a PIL cannot seek action against a foreign country, and that foreign policy is a government function.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/beheading-at-loc-poll-over-nda-backs-what-upa-did/| title=Beheading at LoC: Poll over, NDA backs what UPA did| publisher=Indian Express| author=Utkarsh Anand| date=12 December 2014}}</ref>

Revision as of 07:12, 3 March 2020


Saurabh Kalia
Born(1976-06-29)29 June 1976
Amritsar, Punjab, India
Died9 June 1999(1999-06-09) (aged 22)
Kargil, Jammu and Kashmir, India
AllegianceIndia Republic of India
Service/branch Indian Army
Years of service1998–1999
Rank Captain
Unit4 JAT
Battles/warsKargil War

Captain Saurabh Kalia (1976–1999) was an officer of the Indian Army who was killed during the Kargil War while being held as a prisoner of war by the Pakistan Army.[1] He and five other soldiers of his patrol were captured and allegedly tortured prior to being killed.[1][2] Pakistan has, however, denied torturing any Indian army personnel.[3]

Early years

Captain Saurabh Kalia was born on 29 June 1976 in Amritsar, Punjab, India, to Vijaya and Dr. N. K. Kalia.[4] He was educated at the D.A.V Public School in Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, and then graduated from Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University in 1997 with a First Class BSc Med degree. He won scholarships throughout his academic career.[5]

Military career

Kalia was selected for the Indian Military Academy in August 1997 through the Combined Defence Services exam and was commissioned on 12 December 1998. His first posting was in the 4th battalion Jat Regiment in the Kargil Sector, where he arrived in mid-January 1999 after reporting at the Jat Regimental Centre, Bareilly, on 31 December 1998.

Kargil war

In the first two weeks of May 1999, several patrols were conducted in the Kaksar Langpa area of Kargil district to check whether the snow had retreated enough for the summer positions to be re-occupied.[6] Kalia, who then held the rank uf lieutenant, was the first Indian army officer to observe and report large-scale intrusion of Pakistani Army and foreign mercenaries on the Indian side of the Line of Control (LoC) at Kargil. He assumed guard of Bajrang Post at 13,000–14,000 feet to check infiltration in the Kaksar area.[7]

On 15 May 1999, Kalia and five other soldiers – Sepoys Arjun Ram, Bhanwar Lal Bagaria, Bhika Ram, Moola Ram and Naresh Singh[8] of the 4th Jat Regiment were on a routine patrol of the Bajrang Post in the Kaksar sector in the Ladakh mountains when they engaged in a firefight with Pakistani forces across the LOC. The patrol out of ammunition, were encircled by a platoon of Pakistani rangers, and captured before Indian reinforcements could reach them. Radio Skardu of Pakistan announced the capture.[4][9] It was after this that India discovered hundreds of guerrillas had established fortified positions on the peaks of the hills deep inside the Indian side of the LoC, with sophisticated equipment and supply lines back to Pakistan administered Kashmir.[1]

Indian officials claim that Kalia and his men were in captivity from 15 May 1999 – 7 June 1999 and were subjected to torture. They claim the torture was evident from injuries to their bodies when they were handed over by the Pakistani Army on 9 June 1999.[4] Post-mortem examinations conducted by India reported that the prisoners had cigarette burns, ear-drums pierced with hot rods, many broken teeth and bones, fractured skulls, eyes that had been punctured before being removed, cut lips, chipped noses, and amputated limbs and genitalia. According to the examinations, these injuries preceded the captives being shot dead through their temples.[4][10][11][12][1] However, there was no independent international observer at the post-mortem.[3]

Reaction

On 15 June 1999, the India served Pakistan with a notice of breach of the Geneva Convention for the torture and killing of the prisoners of war.[8] The Minister of External Affairs, Jaswant Singh, raised the issue with Sartaj Aziz, the Foreign Minister of Pakistan, seeking identification and punishment of those responsible, but Pakistan denied the charges of torture.[13]

On 14 December 2012 Pakistan's Interior Minister, Rehman Malik, said that he had just recently heard of the case and that it was not known whether Kalia was killed with a Pakistani bullet or died because of the weather. He also said he would like to meet Kalia's father to find out what exactly had happened with his son. The same day, the Supreme Court of India ordered the Government of India to respond within ten weeks to a petition filed by Kalia's father.[14]

Efforts by family

Kalia's family has tried to get justice for the alleged war crimes committed against their son and his patrol.[4] Kalia's father wants the alleged acts to be declared a war crime by the United Nations and the people responsible to be punished in accordance with the Geneva Convention.[12] However, he stated that he has failed to achieve this despite “shuttling between various government offices and organisations."

"I am ashamed of being an Indian. The country has spineless leaders," said N. K. Kalia. "Though the then Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led National Democratic Alliance government at the Centre expressed concern over the heinous crime and promised to take up the issue at the international level, in all these years the issue got diluted,” he recalled. He also started an online petition to highlight the plight of the war victims.[4]

Kalia's father approached various national and international organisations to put pressure on Pakistan to identify and punish the persons allegedly responsible.[12][15] As of 2004, Britain had responded by saying that it had unsuccessfully sought a full report from the Indian army, while Israel noted it had no diplomatic relations with Pakistan. Germany said it had no response to enquiries made to the Ministry of External Affairs, and Pakistan rejected the allegations.[16]

N. K. Kalia's petition was pursued by the MP Rajeev Chandrasekhar, who wrote to the External Affairs Minister and raised questions in Parliament as to why the Government had not taken up the case with the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). In response, Defence Minister A. K. Antony wrote to Kalia's parents in October 2013 that India was bound by the Simla Agreement, and any differences with Pakistan would be settled bilaterally.[17]

"In order to declare a war crime, the Ministry of Defence needs to write to the Ministry of External Affairs, which then takes up the matter with the UNHRC. The council then refers the matter to the General Assembly, which can declare war crime. It then goes to the international court of justice (ICJ). It is the ministry of external affairs that did not follow up the case with the UN" said Colonel S. K. Aggarwal, a former Judge Advocate General officer.[18] An affidavit filed by the External Affairs ministry in November 2013, said that "moving the ICJ is not a legally enforceable right" and that Pakistan may not permit India submitting a proposal to ICJ.[17]

Indian Army Chief General Bikram Singh reportedly supported the efforts of Kalia's father by writing to the Ministry of Defence and National Human Rights Commission conveying his concerns.[19]

N. K. Kalia, along with Chandrasekhar, and the Flags of Honour Foundation, (an organisation dedicated to building ceaseless engagement between society and the families of killed soldiers), filed a petition with the UNHRC against war crimes and the torture inflicted on Lt Saurabh Kalia and the five jawans by Pakistani forces during the Kargil War in 1999. The petition was filed on 7 December 2012, with Juan E. Méndez, Special Rapporteur on Torture, of the Office of High Commissioner of Human Rights in Geneva.[20] The Indian External Affairs Ministry said it would look at the nature of the petition, as the UNHRC is an inter-state body and usually acts only in terms of initiatives taken by its member states.[21]

Following the formation of the Narendra Modi ministry, the Supreme Court took up public interest litigation (PIL) in September 2014, filed by N. K. Kalia and Sarwa Mitter, and asked the Centre to file an affidavit within six weeks. The Court wanted to know the stand of the new regime, and wondered why the government had not approached the International Court of Justice.[22] The government's affidavit filed in the Supreme Court listed the measures taken by the previous UPA government, and did not list out any proposed steps by the NDA government. The affidavit challenged the petition saying a PIL cannot seek action against a foreign country, and that foreign policy is a government function.[23]

Memorial

Saurabh Kalia's personal belongings, such as photographs, uniforms, shoes and mementoes, are kept in a separate room, named 'Saurabh Smriti Kaksha' (a museum), in his house 'Saurabh Niketan' in the hills of Palampur.[24]

The Government of Himachal Pradesh has named a memorial park in Palampur as "Saurabh Van Vihar", a street as "Capt Saurabh Kalia Marg" and the locality as "Saurabh Nagar".[25] A nursing college in the proposed Vivekanand Medical Research Trust Hospital in Palampur has been raised in his memory.[4] A statue in his memory has been erected in Amritsar.[2] A liquefied petroleum gas agency has been allotted by the Indian Oil Corporation to his parents.[4]

References

  1. ^ a b c d "Pakistan 'tortured Indians to death'". The Independent. 12 June 1999. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  2. ^ a b Singh, Mohinder. Punjab 2000: Political and Socio-economic Developments. Anamika Pub & Distributors, 2001. ISBN 9788186565902.
  3. ^ a b "'Barbarism' insult fired at Pakistan". The Guardian. 12 June 1999. Archived from the original on 24 August 2013.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h "Saurabh Kalia's parents waging a lone battle to highlight war crimes". The Hindu. 6 July 2009. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  5. ^ Lt. Saurabh Kalia www.hpkangra.nic.in Archived 18 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Gill, Kanwar Pal Singh. Terror and containment perspectives of India's internal security. p. 102. ISBN 9788121207126.
  7. ^ "Justice delayed… and denied". Spectrum, The Tribune. 31 July 2011. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  8. ^ a b "Breach of Geneva Convention by Pak armed forces" (PDF). Foreign Affairs Record 1999. Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  9. ^ "War in Kargil". Frontline, The Hindu. 5–18 June 1999. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  10. ^ "History in golden letters?". tehelka.com. 12 February 2005. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  11. ^ "Is this how we should remember Kargil?". Sify News. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  12. ^ a b c Sood, Ravinder (21 March 2008). "Seven years, Captain Kalia's family still waiting for justice". Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  13. ^ "Letter from the Minister of External affairs". Lest We Forget. Ministry of External Affairs, Govt. of India. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  14. ^ "Captain Kalia may have died because of weather: Rehman Malik". ANI. 14 December 2012. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  15. ^ "CJ takes on India, Pak govts over torture of Kargil hero". CNN-IBN. 10 February 2008. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  16. ^ "Kargil first hero". Rediff. Retrieved 30 August 2019.
  17. ^ a b "Govt surrenders to Pakistan on Kargil hero". Mail Today. 20 November 2013. Retrieved 20 November 2013.
  18. ^ "Lest We Forget, Kargil's first hero". Rediff news. 7 June 2004. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  19. ^ "General Bikram Singh extends Support to Family of Kargil Hero Capt. Kalia". IANS. Biharprabha News.
  20. ^ Vicky Nanappa (11 December 2012). "Captain Kalia's father takes fight for justice to UN". rediff. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  21. ^ "Kargil hero Lt Saurabh Kalia's father approaches UNHRC". rediff. 11 December 2012. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  22. ^ "Bring back Indian PoWs in Pakistan, says apex court". The Hindu. 24 September 2014.
  23. ^ Utkarsh Anand (12 December 2014). "Beheading at LoC: Poll over, NDA backs what UPA did". Indian Express.
  24. ^ "A kargil memorial in the time of war". The Indian Express. 26 May 2002. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
  25. ^ "For these parents, life's a mix of grief, pride". The Indian Express. 11 June 2005. Retrieved 29 March 2012.