Talk:Lottery: Difference between revisions
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
The table in this article states the chances as 1 in 2.3, 49, 1176, …, 13983816, while [[Lottery mathematics#Odds of getting other possibilities in choosing 6 from 49]] states these as 1 in 2.2938, 2.4212, …, 13983816. This needs a clarification. -- [[User:Paddu|Paddu]] ([[User talk:Paddu|talk]]) 07:12, 14 December 2019 (UTC) |
The table in this article states the chances as 1 in 2.3, 49, 1176, …, 13983816, while [[Lottery mathematics#Odds of getting other possibilities in choosing 6 from 49]] states these as 1 in 2.2938, 2.4212, …, 13983816. This needs a clarification. -- [[User:Paddu|Paddu]] ([[User talk:Paddu|talk]]) 07:12, 14 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
:i checked the history. it was originally entered correctly. someone changed it thinking they were wrong, but they calculated the chances for a particular number to match a particular ball, not the chances of any of the numbers to match any of the balls. so i reverted that edit.· [[user:lygophile|<font color="DarkRed">Lygophile</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/lygophile|<font color="7700CC">has</font>]] [[user talk:lygophile|<font color="DarkGreen">spoken</font>]] 17:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:39, 23 September 2020
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lottery article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 200 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Merge from Lotology
The article Lotology is a poorly sourced stub that would easily fit as a mention in this article. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- It's utterly unneeded. Send it AFD, since the prod was removed. oknazevad (talk) 13:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- I am not proposing deletion, but a merge. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- And I'm saying it should just be deleted outright. I see no reason to merge a non-notable stub into this article. The most this article should have one sentence saying that some people collect old lottery tickets, using the Mental Floss article as a source. Anything more would be utterly WP:UNDUE. Even then, it's such a non-notable piece of trivia I would remove it from the article anyway. So the other article should just be deleted, not preserved in any fashion. oknazevad (talk) 14:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'll let this run for any other opinions. If you would like to take it to AfD before then, feel free. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- And I'm saying it should just be deleted outright. I see no reason to merge a non-notable stub into this article. The most this article should have one sentence saying that some people collect old lottery tickets, using the Mental Floss article as a source. Anything more would be utterly WP:UNDUE. Even then, it's such a non-notable piece of trivia I would remove it from the article anyway. So the other article should just be deleted, not preserved in any fashion. oknazevad (talk) 14:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- I am not proposing deletion, but a merge. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Page Restructuring
A decent amount of material on this page should be moved to Lotteries by country. The article also is very short on references, and has too much trivia.
Anyone here with any thoughts on potential changes? Power~enwiki (talk) 04:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lottery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080604001924/http://www.usgennet.org/usa/ny/state/police/ch13pt1.html to http://www.usgennet.org/usa/ny/state/police/ch13pt1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Housing and rental lotteries
I think that the frequency and prevalence of housing and rental lotteries might warrant adding a section or brief mention of housing and rental lotteries, or a separate article on the topic housing and rental lotteries. MaynardClark (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Chances of matching different numbers of balls in a 6-from-49 lotto
The table in this article states the chances as 1 in 2.3, 49, 1176, …, 13983816, while Lottery mathematics#Odds of getting other possibilities in choosing 6 from 49 states these as 1 in 2.2938, 2.4212, …, 13983816. This needs a clarification. -- Paddu (talk) 07:12, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- i checked the history. it was originally entered correctly. someone changed it thinking they were wrong, but they calculated the chances for a particular number to match a particular ball, not the chances of any of the numbers to match any of the balls. so i reverted that edit.· Lygophile has spoken 17:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)