User talk:Þjarkur

Or summon me to another discussion with {{hidden ping|Þjarkur}} or {{hidden ping|Thjarkur}}

Tariq Mahmud Naim is a Reliable article

Hello there!

I have noticed that, you make the article named Tariq Mahmud Naim for speedy deletion. I respect your work and knowledge. But, the article I created on that person (I do not know personally) is what I think is realiable as all the references on the noted achievements are cited. Please, remove that speedy deletion and mention where more references are need. I will improve that article gradually for sure. As because that person is really popular and has many notable achievements in his country.

Best regards KBM Nikhil (talk) 19:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello KBM Nikhil, the article has not been tagged for speedy deletion, instead a deletion discussion has been started. I hadn't noticed that the system didn't notify you of the discussion, usually you get an automatic message but that didn't happen here since it's me who is marked as the page's creator in the edit history. But very well, the discussion is held at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Mahmud Naim and your input there is welcome. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the page edit, I'm still learning

Thanks again, I'm still learning so I'll include more references and fact check correctly next time if I create a new Article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SumeetJi (talk • contribs) 08:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Check reference

Dear Þjarkur, I have all references and all of them are very good. Truongdinhnhat (talk) 16:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello Truongdinhnhat, yes the article is referenced, but as I explained it appears that the algorithm may not be notable enough yet since it hasn't yet received attention from secondary sources. – Thjarkur (talk) 16:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

More information of jellyfish search optimizer

Dear Þjarkur, Actually, I am the author of this algorithm, and the algorithm has publised on Applied Mathematics and Computation. At current time, I try to provice some basis information. Next time, I will try to update this arcticle. Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truongdinhnhat (talk • contribs) 17:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

hey

what is the problem with article ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazarasvitlo (talk • contribs) 22:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello Nazarasvitlo, as I mentioned one of your pages was promotional and the other about yourself didn't explain how you were notable enough for a Wikipedia article. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

For explaining things politely to my student. Such explanations are too rare here; too many new editors get nothing but a template (if they are lucky...). Kudos! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For helping out with this. SITH (talk) 17:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Bessie

Moved to Talk:Bessie (South African queen)

 – – Thjarkur (talk) 08:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

General

Hi @Þjarkur

You did some changes to the page which i created Ahmed_Mansur_(film_director) an another user added the category but the page isn't yet patrolled so possible chance for you to patrol it? as it's passed WP:GNG.

--Maj Gen PA (talk) 08:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For approving and helping me out on the Aurora (supercomputer) page. SpaceInspiration (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Creation of Rabih Mockbel

Please check all sources are from reputable news platforms. I've worked on also all the text making it so its very informative. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basselenab (talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Merc Versus

Not all of the articles may mention Merc Versus directly, but they mention songs and albums on which he appeared which can be verified through Discogs.

Example: Merc Versus is a member of Bedlam Brethren. Therefore showing interviews where the group members are named confirms such.

Another example: If I show a blog post that lists an album's tracks it is proof that Merc Versus appeared on a published album.

I am the owner of the copyrights to all of the related albums. From Merc Versus to Bedlam Brethren to Planet Boom Bap.

All of the music I used are published works that can be verified by the albums themselves or through associated review articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Concreteshaman (talk • contribs) 12:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

​There is still too much content that is not verified in the sources. "He is a founding member" is for example not verified in the CD listing, the "Muncie Event" source does not mention him. Discogs is additionally user-generated. See also the general notability guidelines, the subject doesn't appear to have received much significant coverage. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

your help is needed

Your comment is vert much needed is this pic revelant or no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Economy_of_Iran#Reason?Baratiiman (talk) 14:52, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Goats

You have goats?--AbinadiDanvers (talk) 17:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

I sadly do not, not yet at least – Thjarkur (talk) 17:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Would you like to make a page on laughing goat videos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbinadiDanvers (talk • contribs) 15:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Binoscopes

Thank you for your comment concerning the title of my new Wikipedia article I'm proposing about "Binoscopes". As a matter of fact, I am the author of four that have been written and published to date about the subject of "Binoscopes". for more information about them...see the following website. >

http://www.telescopenerd.com/about-binoscopes.htm

In regards to your comment..."If accepted, the title should be "binocular astronomical telescope" which is more common." (I could "not" find this "uncommon" term "binocular astronomical telescope" in my internet searches.) Namronpb (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

I believe the title of my proposed new Wikipedia article "Binoscopes" to be quite appropriate and is used as the one of the "primary" descriptive names/terms used by amateur astronomers, Amateur Telescope Makers (ATMs) and manufacturers who market and sell "Binoscopes (and there are many). "Binoculars" and "Binocular Telescopes" are all included in the same category as "Binoscope" (plural Binoscopes) as pointed out in Wikitionary: > :binoscope > Etymology - Blend of binocular +‎ telescopeNamronpb (talk) 21:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

I consider myself somewhat compelled to write an article about the subject of "binoscopes" to share some of the knowledge I've learned by building and using "binoscopes" over the past 50 years or so. As a result...I'm certain that other Wiki users will be just as interested in my new Wikipedia article about "Binoscopes" as the readers of my books and many articles on the subject of "binoscopes" I've written and had published....Namronpb (talk) 21:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you again...and many thanks for your comment(s),

Best Regards,

Norman ButlerNamronpb (talk) 00:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namronpb (talk • contribs) 20:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello Namronpb, I had noticed your books, but had seen that most manufacturers appeared to use another term, and we try to follow whatever is the most commonly used name. I'm not knowledgeable about astronomy and so I was hoping that another editor would have a look at your draft. I only have one concern about the article and that is that most of the citations are to your own work, which may (again I don't know since I'm not knowledgable about astronomy) place undue emphasis on your work (see WP:SELFCITE). If you know of other books or journal articles about the topic, it would be good to add them. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your Kind Message

Thank for your kind message and thoughtful comments. Currently...there are "no" other published books on the subject of "Binoscopes" that I know of...only mine. I'm just as happy and even more so to "help promote" the accomplishments of others and their Binoscope projects in my books than I am of my own...

In terms of your comment about my "trimming my references" and "citing myself" in my proposed Wikipedia article about "Binoscopes. I only have "three" (3) references with (3) citations listed...and one of them is "cited" with a reference to Scientific American...Namronpb (talk) 16:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you again for your kind and thoughtful comments concerning my proposed Wikipedia article on Binoscopes.

Best Regards,

Norman ButlerNamronpb (talk) 16:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Namronpb (talk) 03:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

State of Concept

Pjarkur, thank you so much for your edit for State of Concept its actually the first independent contemporary art institution of the country, but was not sure how to phrase it? Maybe you can help. I am new here. Kind wishes — Preceding unsigned comment added by SoftPerogatives (talk • contribs) 14:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello SoftPerogatives, I may have misunderstood what it was referring to, from the source it sounded like there were a handful of more qualifiers which didn't make it noteworthy. Have re-added. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

LitePoint

Hello. In mid-August you moved the LitePoint article to a draft. You noted that it was too promotional in tone. I've since edited the article and am now waiting for review. Are you able to review the edits and update the status on its ability to be published?

Thank you, DJADave (talk) 22:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello DJADave, sorry to see that your article has been pending review for so long, our backlog has been growing. Your article does not clearly demonstrate WP:GNG, the sources appear to be press releases and passing mentions. If these are the only available sources then the company is likely not notable enough yet. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello Admin Wikipedia

Khin Khin NuThis article is not yet available on English Wikipedia, I just translate it in Burmese Wikipedia. I don't need anything, I just want to help Wikipedia. my name is Intobesa Burmese: ခင်ခင်နုခင်ခင်နု — Preceding unsigned comment added by 咽頭べさ (talk • contribs) 14:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

​Hello Intobesa, the English Wikipedia has stronger sourcing requirements than many other Wikipedias. When translating, it's best to only translate the parts which can be directly verified in the cited sources. Are you using a machine translation? You've previously been asked about this. You switch between "she" and "he" in the article (indicative of machine translations), and say she was born in the 13th century. (Note that I am not an administrator here, I'm just an editor like you) – Thjarkur (talk) 14:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Availability of 5G by country for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Availability of 5G by country is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Availability of 5G by country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 15:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Michael Ajah

I am not self promoting .I genuinely added content with Value. If there are more sources required to validate the authenticity of this page. I would be glad to add

Sultan Ghani

Hi Pjarkur, why was the page deleted? it's regarding a public figure with references — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliassultan (talk • contribs) 16:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

This person has a social position within a certain scope and a significant influence and so is often widely of concern to the public, can benefit enormously from society, and is closely related to public interests in Afghanistan. There are a number of cited references. He has many notable achievements and is related to the head of state. Please reconsider the deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliassultan (talk • contribs) 16:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Linux kernel - Introduction

Hello Þjarkur, I had to restore your reversion of the leader of Linux kernel. If you are interested to the reasons why and you want to actively contribute to the article, please first read Linux kernel - Introduction. Thanks, Fabio Maria De Francesco (talk) 00:12, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

COI editor on PIRG page requests assistance

Hello User:Þjarkur and thank you for previously reviewing my requests designed to improve the Public Interest Research Group article. I have posted a request to improve the structure of the article by creating two distinct and more traditional sections rather than the one labeled Funding Model and allegations of unfair labor practices. Would you be willing to take a look at the request on the article talk page and give me feedback? I am not seeking to change much of the text, but rather to segregate it into sections that more clearly reflect best practices for Wikipedia articles. Thanks in advance! DanDavidCook (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Ndukwe Onuoha

Even after this they have moved it back to mainspace/recreated it. I have placed both an A7 & {{Salt}} on the article if it doesn’t get speedy deleted or salted, I’d take it to AFD because I guess a G4 might be relevant in future. Celestina007 (talk) 14:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Sounds quite reasonable – Thjarkur (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

RM for Kaspien

Good morning (to me on CEST!) Þjarkur... You suggested and the hatnotes said that this should be merged.... to be fair to the contributor, the COI us declared. i have absolutely no interest in this company at all, neither financially nor otherwise, never heard of 'em. I can do the merge if you want,but as IP I might need your support or another confirmed user for tidying up loose ends... I can be absolutely neutral on this and make it to WP's usual standards (e.g. that we don't tend to put "Ltd.", "Inc." etc after company names) and all the usual gnoming. I hesitate to do it WP:BOLDly when this seems to have gone around the houses for a month now. 84.236.27.182 (talk) 02:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

hhmm, I think this is the usual kerfuffle. AfD recommends a merge but nobody actually ever does the merge. I can take it and do it, but it's all over the place.... obviously WP:NCCORP etc applies and so on, the RM should be speedy close. I think the AfD decisionw as wrong, via WP:N or rather WP:MILL. The user, I did a contributions check, has only ever contributed to Trans World Entertainment and created Kaspien on 17 September. I don't mean to be rude, but by the user's own admission this is essentially a WP:PLUG. I think the AfD decision was wrong, I'd like your opinion. The addition to RM is perhaps WP:FORUMSHOP, but I am sure in good faith (who would not want to promote his or her company?) but wrong place to do it. I'll quite happily merge if that is the consensus, but I'd like a second set of eyes on this please. 84.236.27.182 (talk) 02:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)