Jump to content

Talk:Cloud computing: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Update Information Systems Management assignment details
Covelus (talk | contribs)
67 edits
Removal of the previous mention to "NASA's OpenNebula" for lack of references
Line 53: Line 53:
I am requesting to update the history section and add a paragraph about the BSCW system being the first system that you would call "cloud" today. It was developed by the Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology and published in 1995. There is a article about it on their page that can be found at https://www.fit.fraunhofer.de/en/fb/cscw/projects/bscw_20-Jahre.html.
I am requesting to update the history section and add a paragraph about the BSCW system being the first system that you would call "cloud" today. It was developed by the Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology and published in 1995. There is a article about it on their page that can be found at https://www.fit.fraunhofer.de/en/fb/cscw/projects/bscw_20-Jahre.html.
It is also included at the german Cloud Computing Wikipedia page. I think it would be a good addition to the page. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:OrbiTeam|OrbiTeam]] ([[User talk:OrbiTeam#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OrbiTeam|contribs]]) 09:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
It is also included at the german Cloud Computing Wikipedia page. I think it would be a good addition to the page. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:OrbiTeam|OrbiTeam]] ([[User talk:OrbiTeam#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OrbiTeam|contribs]]) 09:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== History: Removal of the previous mention to "NASA's OpenNebula" for lack of references, repaced by Nebula ==

Hello,

OpenNebula was listed as NASA's project, which seems to be wrong: the linked page, [[OpenNebula]], had nothing to do with NASA, but with a Spanish university spinoff ([[OpenNebula Systems]]).

There's no evidence of NASA having anything to do with OpenNebula, and there are no references to OpenNebula in the reference paper, "The RESERVOIR Model and Architecture for Open Federated Cloud Computing", which is publicly available at https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.330.3880&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Indeed, the right reference seems to be Nebula: https://www.nasa.gov/open/nebula.html



== Characteristics ==
== Characteristics ==

Revision as of 17:29, 15 November 2020

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconComputing C‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

First usage of the concept

I have reverted the addition of an alleged first introduction of this concept by Hardy F. Schloer. True or not, this is a strong extraordinary claim and needs sourcing by an acknowledged expert in a reliable mainstream publication who thoroughly analyzes this claim in context. Primary sources like patents are insufficient for such a strong claim, as are student projects or mere conference papers with a passing mention that have been published on a NGO website and republished in a minor journal (that is apparently connected to the NGO and focusses on mere republications of such conference papers). The authors' expertise and academic credentials in the mentioned school are also unclear - again such a strong claim should be made by an acknowledged reputed expert. Wikipedia is no venue to popularize new ideas and theories from research scholars and students with insufficient coverage in academic expert sources. GermanJoe (talk) 12:47, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; this clearly shouldn't be in the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:38, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2019

This includes data caps, which are placed on cloud users by the cloud vendor allocating certain amount of bandwidth for each customer and are often shared among other cloud users.[120] [1]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 15:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note that this may be a WP:SELFCITE. It may be acceptable, but it should be checked for conflict of interest. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ VICENTINI, CLEVERTON ; SANTIN, ALTAIR ; VIEGAS, EDUARDO ; ABREU, VILMAR (2018). "A Machine Learning Auditing Model for Detection of Multi-Tenancy Issues Within Tenant Domain" (PDF). 18th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID). IEEE Press: 543–552. doi:10.1109/CCGRID.2018.00081.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Clarity and neutrality

Daveburstein (talk) 23:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC) I rewrote the first few paragraphs to make them more understandable to a non-technical user. I also removed or reworked what I considered non-neutral. It would be good to do similar for the whole article. Dave[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2019

117.211.131.5 (talk) 06:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: blank edit request. Roadguy2 (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit History

Hello,

I am requesting to update the history section and add a paragraph about the BSCW system being the first system that you would call "cloud" today. It was developed by the Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology and published in 1995. There is a article about it on their page that can be found at https://www.fit.fraunhofer.de/en/fb/cscw/projects/bscw_20-Jahre.html. It is also included at the german Cloud Computing Wikipedia page. I think it would be a good addition to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrbiTeam (talk • contribs) 09:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

History: Removal of the previous mention to "NASA's OpenNebula" for lack of references, repaced by Nebula

Hello,

OpenNebula was listed as NASA's project, which seems to be wrong: the linked page, OpenNebula, had nothing to do with NASA, but with a Spanish university spinoff (OpenNebula Systems).

There's no evidence of NASA having anything to do with OpenNebula, and there are no references to OpenNebula in the reference paper, "The RESERVOIR Model and Architecture for Open Federated Cloud Computing", which is publicly available at https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.330.3880&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Indeed, the right reference seems to be Nebula: https://www.nasa.gov/open/nebula.html


Characteristics

Hello,

the chapter "Characteristics" is in my opinion too single sided in favour of cloud providers. There's no real con argument. Some examples: latency is in case of cloud computing higher than for "local" processing. Billing is unreproducible for the user as you have to trust your cloud provider that it does it correctly. Cloud servers are usually overcommitted meaning that worst case the cloud provider can't give your application more capacity as there's none. (DDoS-) Attacks on cloud providers threaten cloud users businesses as the "internal" team of cloud users can't do anything when they depend on a connection to the cloud provider.

--Leuchuk (talk) 07:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Leuchuk: - Good point. It is rather one-sided. There are some of the negatives discussed in the Limitations and disadvantages section, but they are not covered in any depth. If someone did have the time to find some reliable sources and add some critique of cloud computing, that could be a useful contribution to the article. (I don't see having the time myself, but maybe I will sometime in the future if no one else does it first.) - Dyork (talk) 16:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cloud_computing&oldid=988854225"