Talk:Common integrals in quantum field theory: Difference between revisions
WikiProject Mathematics. Section titles added. Readership statistics. |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Undefined variable== |
==Undefined variable== |
||
Can someone define the symbol "alpha" in section "Integrals with differential operators in the argument"? [[Special:Contributions/160.39.34.120|160.39.34.120]] ([[User talk:160.39.34.120|talk]]) 05:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC) |
Can someone define the symbol "alpha" in section "Integrals with differential operators in the argument"? [[Special:Contributions/160.39.34.120|160.39.34.120]] ([[User talk:160.39.34.120|talk]]) 05:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Modified Coulomb potential with mass -- "erroneous correction"? == |
|||
Over a decade ago, I corrected what appeared to be an error -- a typo, perhaps. Specifically, I changed g(mr) --> 0 to g(mr) --> 1. |
|||
I just went over my history of "contributions" and edit differences. It appears that zero is correct after all -- although I could be blundering now instead of ten years ago. It appears to refer to the expression in braces: |
|||
<math> |
|||
1 + \frac2{mr} + \frac2{(mr^2)} \left(e^{mr} - 1 \right) |
|||
</math> |
|||
Unless I'm blundering now, that term really does approach zero. It also appears that my "correction" has continued to propagate down to now. Could someone please check this? Wherever I blundered, I sincerely apologize.[[User:Johnm307|Johnm307]] ([[User talk:Johnm307|talk]]) 05:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:04, 6 January 2021
Physics B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Mathematics B‑class Mid‑priority | ||||||||||
|
"Feynman's famous formula"
So what happened with `Feynman's famous formula'? (See Witten et. al., Quantum fields and strings: A course for mathematicians, Volume 1, page 427, Proposition 1.3.) 140.180.10.63 (talk) 08:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Undefined variable
Can someone define the symbol "alpha" in section "Integrals with differential operators in the argument"? 160.39.34.120 (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Modified Coulomb potential with mass -- "erroneous correction"?
Over a decade ago, I corrected what appeared to be an error -- a typo, perhaps. Specifically, I changed g(mr) --> 0 to g(mr) --> 1.
I just went over my history of "contributions" and edit differences. It appears that zero is correct after all -- although I could be blundering now instead of ten years ago. It appears to refer to the expression in braces:
Unless I'm blundering now, that term really does approach zero. It also appears that my "correction" has continued to propagate down to now. Could someone please check this? Wherever I blundered, I sincerely apologize.Johnm307 (talk) 05:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)