User contributions for Gmaxwell

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

02:0802:08, 12 May 2020 diff hist −52‎ Adam Back ‎ No support by citation, citation actually states the opposite (that it supports not competes with). But it's not exactly a third party source so better to be silent on that subject.
02:0502:05, 12 May 2020 diff hist −344‎ Adam Back ‎ →‎Business career: Nist Citation contains absolutely nothing supporting this statement in the slightest, doesn't even contain the words blockstream or adam back or similar.

04:2504:25, 12 December 2019 diff hist +587‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightning Network ‎ →‎Discussion: re
03:5103:51, 12 December 2019 diff hist +474‎ User talk:McZusatz ‎ →‎Bitcoin XT article: new section
03:4503:45, 12 December 2019 diff hist +76‎ m Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightning Network ‎ little addition to my comment
03:4303:43, 12 December 2019 diff hist +1,007‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightning Network ‎ →‎Lightning Network: comment

00:4100:41, 3 December 2019 diff hist +1,075‎ User talk:David Gerard ‎ →‎Inadvertent revert revert: new section
00:1300:13, 3 December 2019 diff hist −2‎ m Talk:Bitcoin XT ‎ →‎Bitcoin XT is long defunct and the article is massively out of date, should this be deleted?: fixlinks
00:1200:12, 3 December 2019 diff hist +720‎ Talk:Bitcoin XT ‎ →‎Bitcoin XT is long defunct and the article is massively out of date, should this be deleted?: new section
00:0400:04, 3 December 2019 diff hist +818‎ Blockstream ‎ →‎Research and Open Source Initiatives: on research publications, add journal citations

23:3523:35, 2 December 2019 diff hist +25‎ m Blockstream ‎ →‎Initiatives: more accurate section name
23:3323:33, 2 December 2019 diff hist −200‎ Blockstream ‎ move longer sentence from lower in the article up.
23:0723:07, 2 December 2019 diff hist −77‎ Blockstream ‎ rm redundant text also in the initiatives section and doesn't really make sense in the opening.
23:0623:06, 2 December 2019 diff hist −363‎ Blockstream ‎ The combination of the two sources is a violation of WP:SYNTH (as it combines two activities and claims they're connected), also "Forbes contributors" are a "Generally unreliable" source and should not be used. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Forbes.com_contributors
22:5622:56, 2 December 2019 diff hist −32‎ Blockstream ‎ →‎Initiatives: rm completely unsourced (and I believe untruthful) claim about "community steering. Also, as per earlier edit-- source doesn't support "large number" claim, and in fact the company only employs one prominent developer of Bitcoin Core.
22:5422:54, 2 December 2019 diff hist −820‎ Blockstream ‎ →‎The Liquid Network: Not a single one of the citations supports the claim that liquid was proposed to be added to the bitcoin protocol. It wasn't and that wouldn't make logical sense (and liquid is in service today, and required no modifications to the bitcoin protocol)
22:5122:51, 2 December 2019 diff hist −15‎ Blockstream ‎ Large number claim is factually untrue and also isn't supported by the source (which does not say large number). In fact, Blockstream only employs one prominent developer of Bitcoin Core (Pieter).
22:4722:47, 2 December 2019 diff hist −90‎ Blockstream ‎ This is naming a bunch of people that haven't been affiliated with the company in years, including myself-- including them in the lead makes no sense.

00:3500:35, 26 November 2019 diff hist −9,609‎ User talk:Gmaxwell ‎ Clear off handled comments.

08:3408:34, 21 October 2019 diff hist −363‎ Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By profession ‎ Rm myself: An article was previously created and deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gregory_Maxwell nothing has changed which would change that outcome, cheers!

03:1103:11, 17 September 2019 diff hist −60‎ User:Gmaxwell ‎ rm outdated

21:5221:52, 2 July 2019 diff hist +781‎ User talk:EllsworthSK ‎ →‎You are, of course, absolutely right. Re: Arbcom letter and staff response: new section
19:3819:38, 2 July 2019 diff hist +715‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Acknowledging statement to Arbcom open letter: be nice

15:1415:14, 30 June 2019 diff hist +581‎ User talk:Risker ‎ Just commenting on riskers excellent explanation.
13:0713:07, 30 June 2019 diff hist +230‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Open letter to the WMF Board
12:5812:58, 30 June 2019 diff hist +9‎ m Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram ‎ →‎Let's not burn down the wiki
12:5612:56, 30 June 2019 diff hist +441‎ Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram ‎ →‎Let's not burn down the wiki: geesh, I can't believe I'm quoting Ayn Rand.
12:4012:40, 30 June 2019 diff hist +11‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Open letter to the WMF Board
12:3712:37, 30 June 2019 diff hist +814‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Open letter to the WMF Board: q to hobit
12:2712:27, 30 June 2019 diff hist +2,071‎ Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram ‎ →‎Let's not burn down the wiki
11:5111:51, 30 June 2019 diff hist +12‎ m Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard ‎ →‎Open letter to the WMF Board
11:4711:47, 30 June 2019 diff hist +797‎ Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard ‎ comment.

09:5809:58, 9 March 2019 diff hist +671‎ 42 (number) ‎ →‎Mathematics: 42 is now the smallest number presumed to have a representation as the sum of three integers cubed which unknown
09:5009:50, 9 March 2019 diff hist −579‎ 33 (number) ‎ now known (8866128975287528)^3+(-8778405442862239)^3+(-2736111468807040) == 33 https://pub.ist.ac.at/~tbrownin/