Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSN 1977 and 1978 Reunion Tours

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CSN 1977 and 1978 Reunion Tours

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:NTOURS. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The box office scores from Billboard Magazines show quite clearly this tour was a financial success which shows its answers both WP:GNG and WP:NTOURS. Please provide how much media coverage you are looking for to allow this article to stay, please be as specific as possible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassidd (talk • contribs) 16:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added reviews of the concerts. I am still waiting on your response for what else is needed?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassidd (talk • contribs) 17:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There may also be info in the recent Crowe doc, as well as in Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young: The Wild, Definitive Saga of Rock's Greatest Supergroup, CSNY: Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young, and Hotel California: The True-Life Adventures of Crosby, Stills, Nash, Young, Mitchell, Taylor, Browne, Ronstadt, Geffen, the Eagles, and Their Many Friends. Caro7200 (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: given the artist involved, there is likely to be enough coverage from the time to make this tour notable. But one of the biggest issues I have with all the Stephen Stills-related tour articles that this editor has created is that the titles of them are original research – they are names given to them by the editor, and not the official names of the tours. @Cassidd: the personnel and set list sections are unsourced, and you haven't shown how you are going to source them... Setlist.fm is not a valid source for the set list, as it is user-supplied information. Richard3120 (talk) 21:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Richard3120, and that could be why I didn't find any info on it when I searched. But Cassidd is not going to reply to you, having now been indeffed. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I realize that this AfD is on track to wind up as a "no consensus" and that User:Cassidd is no longer available to participate, but I would note that the "box office scores from Billboard Magazines" do not prove that this tour was "a financial success". Fewer than half of the shows on this tour had their box office results reported in Billboard (or at least, if the results were reported, they are not included in this article). Only the box office revenue, not the tour expenses, were reported anyway. And even if CSN were able to sell out their shows, it's possible that other artists could have sold out the same venues with higher ticket prices. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:39, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above comments. Problems with original research and spotty sourcing, for an article created by blocked account. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 06:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.