Jump to content

User talk:Bkissin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cbswagman (talk | contribs) at 21:08, 17 February 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Draft: Battle For Dream Island

The Battle For Dream Island Draft Is Something That Made Me Happy So Approve the Battle For Dream Island Wikipedia Or Get Eliminated... (Please?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by an unspecified IP address

Draft:Seymskiy Regional Landscape Park

Hi, I have added one more reference to this article and hope you can review it again! Thanks and cheers! Doc Dimaus (talk|contrib) — Preceding undated comment added 22:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Manon Blanchet) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Manon Blanchet, Bkissin!

Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating!

To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Draft: Miss Avakin

Hi. i hope i am not being rude. but you declined my article and i have added references. I am new here so please don't delete simply decline again and i would keep on trying. Thank you

Thanks!! TristanNdianga (talk)

Maccabi USA Wikipedia Page

I cited CharityNavigator on the first paragraph and am still editing the rest of the page. 

Talk hartilli — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Declined Draft:Aqua Mail is up-dated. Please review it again.

Hi Bikissin,

I have added more reference sourses to the Aqua Mail draft page. Could you please review it again?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aqua_Mail

Best regards and thank you for your time,

Wiki The Author

16:36 18 September 2018

Declined Draft: Diane Giraud

Hi Bkissin,

My draft has been rejected for Copyright material but I don't see which content you refer to. Can you give me more details? Some content comes from official FB page of the Artist (which is copyright free content) and we got her approval for that anyway.

Thanks for your help, RA

I asked for help.

Question regard Draft:John_Christopher_Muran

Hi Bkissin, I am a doctoral candidate working with Dr. Muran and trying to create a page for him. I have edited the page in response to the comments (i.e. paraphrasing, citation, & publication section). Would you mind take a look when you get a chance to see if it's better now? Thank you! -Di

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:John_Christopher_Muran

Your Reason for Declining Dawn Smith Jordan draft

You said, "Being a Miss America runner-up is not notability..." which seems inconsistent with existing pages on Wikipedia. For example, as I look at the list of other Miss South Carolina winners in Wikipedia, there a number of former winners with their own pages and most have their chief measure of notability as winning Miss South Carolina. Note that you have to win Miss South Carolina to even compete in Miss America, and Dawn Smith was a finalist in Miss America. A good specific example is Ali Rogers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Rogers). Ali Rogers has nothing more on her page other than winning beauty pageants, the most significant being Miss South Carolina and also was a finalist in Miss America. She did not sing in a Billy Graham crusade, hasn't recorded songs, written books, have an active ministry throughout the United States, and so forth. I intend to continue to add to the draft providing additional items of notability, but the above comment by itself is inconsistent with what I already see approved on Wikipedia. My assumption is it will eventually get approved as I document more, but I contend it should already be approved based on what I see on Ali Rogers' page.

Review

Hello, Bkission. I have seen your reviews about my draft. But in fact, I did not find the same topic with me and all of them pay attention to the whole information, which is not same as mine- use. Thank you

Hi


I believe my article should not have been rejected, I have cited as much as possible. I really need that page to be live for school. Lerato Kganyago or may you please guide me on where Im going wrong cause I dont see anything wrong with my article

Windsor Tablelands

Hi Bkissin,

I've made the changes now for the draft page for review: "Windsor Tablelands", and added a good lead section for the article. Hope this is sufficient! I was also just wanting to ask a question about changing the title of the page, upon greater investigation the geographical location is more commonly known as the 'Mount Windsor Tableland' as opposed to the 'Windsor Tablelands'.

Best Regards, Mcat963

Hi!

Thanks for viewing my article! I noticed that the article has been assessed to the start-class, and I had a look at the example article of start-class, I don't think my article is that bad : ). so, can you please give me some advice so that I can improve it. Many thanks!! (Architecture of Zimbabwe)=> name of my article

Best regards, Zimou Yuan

Draft: priyadarshi ranjan article deleted

Nathaniel Phillips Submision Declined

Ok did not know thanks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Spiceheads

Please can you explain in lay mens English whats wrong with this? Spiceheads is the worlds leading brandname for information, help and advice to the public about NPS, that has sold many pix and videos to News agencys that have been published without accredication. It comes up hits 1,2 and 3 in Google and Bing when you serch the term Spiceheads and has provided cited information, advice and photographs to the Sunday Times. I just do not understand what is wrong, most of it refairs back to the cited main article in Vice and I have asked for help to connect up the citations, but no one has offered. I am both phisically and mentaly disabled, as you should be able to tell by my spelling and grammer. Instead of just rejecting it over and over, why will one of you intelegent accademics help an old guy with dementia? Is it because I am disabled that I am being treated in this way? Or is it the subject matter? All in all I am bewildered in a page that openly says that anyone, can publish or edit somthing, when clearly it is realy anyone with a degree in English that's part of the club. Not having a go at you personally, just very upset, almost suisidal that no one will halp me and I am being treated this way

Regarding outright Rejection to publish an article about a renowned Professor

Hi, Dear moderator Bkissin I have sent a small introduction about a scientist that you have rejected. In my opinion, this is a very and biased action. Rupesh Chaturvedi has contributed much in the medical field that is benefiting to the science community and it will give more benefit in the future. If you are writing an article about a person who has not given anything this world like (I can give you many examples) and at the same time declining a person who has a number of research articles/papers in the famous journal like PNAS, Cell, Nature, present on PubMed cited by approx 50000 times. Besides this as per I know He is the most cited scientist of India's Top Ranked Jawaharlal Nehru university, that you can see Rupesh Chaturvedi google scholar citation. He is also Director of R&D of JNU New Delhi that you can see on JNU website. Rupesh Chaturvedi is in USA Washington DC and already started a Big Startup project in the medical field. It was my first article and now it was last also. Public opinion that I have listened about the biases of Wikipedia, I got it to be correct. This is the respect what we as a researcher get from the common people for whom we worked for day and night.

Thank you very much, Mr. Bkissin Achyut Pandey Research scholar JNU New Delhi

Nathaniel Phillips Submision Resubmitted

He has made a senior appearance for VFB Stuttgart in the DFB Pokal so I have resubmitted the draft. and also added some references.
User:2A02:C7F:9616:2800:414F:2913:8C11:AF64 (talk) 10:52, 14 August 2019 (GMT)

Draft:In Chang-soo

Hi, When do you finish review of Draft:In Chang-soo He definately meets the WP:NFOOTY

Footwiks (talk)

Draft: Zain Ouadah

Hello Bkissin, how are you ?

I just want to tell you that I saw your comment on the :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zain_Ouadah

Many boxers have and are still accepted despite these criteria. Several sources have been added in recent days. I really think this boxer is eligible for publication on Wikipedia. I registered on Wikipedia a few months ago and I hope you can review your decision, it would encourage me to create other pages.

Thank you

Andy12349 (talk)

New articles

Dream (Youtuber) Having hard time with source

Dear Bkissin, as you probably know, you decline my draft. I'm doing a page for Dream who is famous for his speedrun world record and his speedrunner vs hunters videos on youtube. I'm have a hard time with the source as I went through about 10 pages in google search and couldn't find any more information other than his Youtube account. Also he has about 9 million Subscribers and about to hit 10 million by the end of this month. If you have any tip for me in the source, please reply as soon as possible. See you soon and have a great week ,Conor Mckinley

Draft:Zvi Yosipovitch

Hi Bkissin,

I just updated my submission for Zvi Yosipovitch so it doesn't read like a memorial. Please re-review. Happy to receive any edits/suggestions you may have.

Thank you!

natalieyo — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Declined :Draft:Queen High Straight (album)

Hi Bkissin,

I have added further references so not just from the artist's webpage. When you have time can you please re-review, and advise on anything else I can do. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Queen_High_Straight_(album)

Many thanks

Kincaide

my draft Prestonplayz was declined

I wanted to create a page for Preston because he is on the famous people on the internet without a Wikipedia page and I can’t find any more sources for him so can you just let it be a live article cuz it took me a long time to research and type up his article

Merry Christmas

Draft:Ending the HIV Epidemic Initiative

Hello and Happy New Year,

Are you able to take another pass to review for submission approval?

Thank you for your help with this.

Johnsones20 (talk)Johnsones20

Richard A. Dawson

In cleaning this up you left an unencyclopedic note at the top (now removed, and partly actioned). It would also have been useful to add the DEFAULTSORT (done). Thanks. PamD 14:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

James Gordon Frierson

In cleaning this up you added birth and death categories but not the DEFAULTSORT which makes him file under F rather than J.

There is splendid template: {{L}}, which much be "substituted" when you use it. Here's my "boilerplate" text about it:

There is a very easy way to add the DEFAULTSORT (so the article files by surname in lists), and Category:Living people where appropriate, and any birth or death date category: {{subst:L|1882|1984|Brown, Annie}} would create {{DEFAULTSORT:Brown, Annie}}, Category:1882 births and Category:1984 deaths, while {{subst:L|||Smith, Jane}} would create {{DEFAULTSORT:Smith, Jane}}, Category:Living people and Category:Date of birth missing (living people). Lack of death date implies "living" (or you can add "unknown" or "missing" as the death date to suppress this). You get a lot done for a few keystrokes: I think it's a great little template. Happy Editing. PamD 18:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi PamD. I appreciate your concern, but those are automated edits from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script. That is what cleans up the articles after I accept them. You are more than welcome to talk to User:FloridaArmy about putting the DEFAULTSORT information in the article before submitting them to AfC. I'm just trying to bring down the article backlog. Bkissin (talk) 19:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite of a living person bio= Barbara Carey-Shuler

I completed a rewrite of a living person, taking your comments and incorporating them in the rewrite - Barbara Carey-Shuler - resubmitted at 2115Z today Friday 2010-01-29! Please review . Ojuice1701 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ojuice1701 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More Sources Added now.

Hi Bkissin,

please take review again on draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lakha,_Maharashtra i have added more sources now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imzaidk (talk • contribs) 05:42, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--Imzaidk (talk) 05:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More Sources Added now.

Hi Bikissin,

please take review again on draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lakha,_Maharashtra as i have added more sources now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imzaidk (talk • contribs) 05:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jill Barry - Draft - added more sources

You commented that I needed to add more sources to the draft page for Jill Barry. I have since added some. This is my first Wikipedia page, so I'm not totally sure of the process to get something approved. Hopefully I added enough sources. Thanks! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jill_Barry

Regarding the Christian Weston Chandler article

How exactly is he not notable? He's been covered and referenced by PewDiePie, Sega, Harry Partridge, and others. There are multiple videos of him on YouTube with views in the hundreds of thousands and even millions. How is Laz-D notable and not Chris? I have reposted this in case you haven't seen the first one. Cbswagman (talk) 04:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hii

Hi today https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deniz_Unay My article has been approved I want to say the following about the article I have been working on this article for more than 4 months I took into account all rejections and also got information and support from editors in wikipedia support chat You can see developments on this subject on the Talk Page In addition, the other day, this article was rejected in the form of a copy, and this error was corrected, now the article has been unfairly deleted. There is no charge for this article I don't know how to defend myself on this issue I also added the best resources about Deniz UNAY, if you look at google searches, dozens of valuable resources can be found. Please don't be so cruel and unfair I hope you can help greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emremer (talk • contribs) 20:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luís Raposo (archaeologist)

Hi Bkissin,

The draft has just been reviewd. I followed your comments. I guess it's OK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luís Raposo (archaeologist)

My best,

ICOMATIK (talk) 23:50, 05 Fabuary 2021 (UTC)

Concerns

Hello Bkissin,

As is seen on this page, you have repeatedly failed to respond to other editors who contacted you. Wikipedia is not an individual endeavor, but a collaborative one, and you are expected to respond to those who contact you with concerns. I also have concerns with your approval of a promotional article. Please indicate that you are not operating either a bot or on autopilot by responding directly and appropriately to this message. Seraphimblade Talk to me 12:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which article are you particularly concerned about? Bkissin (talk) 14:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The particular article in this instance was Upper Silesian Museum. When you approved it, it contained promotional wording such as ...thanks to which the collections of the Upper Silesian Museum were enriched..., This unique gift included..., and then unreferenced brochure-type statements such as Archaeology Department of the Upper Silesian Museum has the richest, over 350,000 (16,651 inventory items), collection of archaeological relics concerning the past of Silesia within the area of Upper Silesia, spanning the period from the Stone Age to the Middle Ages., ...which today is quite significant..., ...played a leading role..., and on and on like that. Promotional articles should not be approved and moved to mainspace, and nor should largely unreferenced ones. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry you feel that way. Regardless of whether AfC reviewers accept or decline an article, we seem to get criticized or WP:ASPERSIONS cast to our conduct. Some of my colleagues in AfC go with the mindset that if a subject passes notability (as the museum was) that it can move out of draftspace and that continuing to decline notable drafts because of unrelated issues is not the role of the Draftspace. In fact, that mindset touches upon your point that Wikipedia is a collaborative endeavor, as NPP and other patrollers can make the relevant changes to the article to clean it up. You'll note that when I realized the article was written by Museum staff, I added a COI tag to make sure that any NPOV language could be taken care of.
On your other point about not responding to users: Wikipedia is not my job. I try to be a firm believer in "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all". I'm not going to deal with every non-notable promo draft or undisclosed PAID case who is asking why their article was declined. I have a life (Not much of one, but a life nevertheless). My goal has been to bring down the massive backlog of articles at AfC and to make sure that they are quality contributions to the project. You are more than welcome to bring me to ANI and have my reviewer status revoked if you feel as if I'm not living up to those standards after 15 years on the website. Or, alternatively, you are welcome to join us at AfC and review some of these articles as well. We could always use the help! Otherwise, I think less interaction between the two of us would be a healthy choice, at least until cooler heads prevail. Bkissin (talk) 18:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Draft: Contemporary Lynx

Hi Bkissin, thank you for taking the time to review this draft. I would like to know if you think the second link "A hand painted cover for the Contemporary Lynx magazine" is reliable/justifies notability for the page , or whether a new submission would require different sources entirely. Thank you again, Captains224 (talk) 16:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My concern around sources was due to a couple different factors. In order to establish notability, we want sources that are independent of the subject matter. Obviously the website for Contemporary Lynx thinks the magazine is notable, it is the subject of the article! What do other reliable sources have to say about it? Has it had in-depth coverage in those sources (not just press releases or passing mentions). The second link is borderline, but probably doesn't meet the standard. Bkissin (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your detailed response. That is good to know. Best, Captains224 (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bsikkin! I am from Pakistan, why did you decline my article? I am informing you that I did not copy any of it, and didn't log onto those websites. 11 year old Ahmad, Islamabad,Pakistan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.175.69.43 (talk) 05:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Morgan & Morgan

Hi Bkissin. The current draft is full of puffery WP:PUFF which you have rightly rejected last year. But it's one of the activism-driven law firms in Florida and also active in my state (North Carolina). I was wondering is it worth enough for attempting an edit for an AfC practice purpose? -Hatchens (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oof, I just reread through it and I don't know. I'm pretty wary about law firms (especially personal injury firms) trying to make a case for notability. I do see where you're coming from with some of the former attorneys on staff and the Community Bail Fund stuff. Unfortunately, I'm thinking it would take a pretty substantial rewrite to be good to submit. If you want to work on it you are more than welcome. That keeps it from G13 deletion. Bkissin (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bkissin, Let me check it out... how much I can neutralize it. I don't have much hope either. - Hatchens (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, regarding your question, as per the notability status I don’t think MUSICBIO bio is satisfied because most of his alleged achievements written in the article that would make him eligible to meet MUSICBIO are substantiated by unreliable sources. Daniel just salted the article & rightfully so, so I’m not even sure how it popped up again, I probably missed something. As for the paid status, I’d say from an objective stance, that given the history of this article (different socks creating and recreating it 6 times now) i’d say it would be a very convenient coincidence that the editor who created the article just coincidentally did so. My opinion would be there’s definitely a COI present.

TL:DR? : This is most likely the work of an inexperienced UPE editor and the subject isn’t notable because only unreliable sources substantiates the achievements written in the article. Celestina007 (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Celestina007! That's just what I needed to put my mind at ease. Usually I'm pretty good about sniffing out UPE and COI, but I also don't want to intentionally delete possible unrepresented content. Bkissin (talk) 17:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I totally understand your point of view. Celestina007 (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luís Raposo (archaeologist)

Dear Bkissin,

The Portuguese and French versions of the article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luís Raposo (archaeologist)

have been improved, carefully revised and they will stay as they are for some time. I have just adapted the English version to what has been done.

For that reason, dear colleague, please review the draft again. That will take no longer than two or three minutes. I'm sure you won't hesitate to convert this draft into article.

Fostering the presence of museums on Wikipedia and Wikidata (added on February 14)

My cordial greetings.


My best,

ICOMATIK (talk) 22:07, 09 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

St Helena Magistrates' Court

Thanks for helping me publish my first Wikipedia article, St Helena Magistrates' Court ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.232.208.157 (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have created an article for an Indian television actor

Respected Sir, I hope you are doing great. I have recently created a wikipedia page for an Indian television actor name Sahnil Bhatnagar. Please if possible review his draft. Thank you so much for your time. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sahnil_Bhatnagar_TV_Actor)

Best Regards

Sohan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sohanjoshi85 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Babilou Family Draft

Dear Bkissin, I shortened the draft to stick to mainly numbers etc., as you were mentioning it wasn't objective enough. Hope this time it fits, would be looking forward to a comment otherwise to better understand the issue. Kind regards, Ann — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnLouL (talk • contribs) 16:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kameelion review

Hey!

Are you able to accept drafts? I noticed your comment on the edit. I am pretty confidence this now co-insides with all the Wikipedia rules and the first issues from the first draft are now rectified.

Thanks Ashcroft18 (talk) 19:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Čohodari

Information icon Hello, Bkissin. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Čohodari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sally Conforte not written in a formal, neutral encyclopedic tone

Thank you for reviewing my work! I struggle with the encyclopedic tone. I created a personal article that goes to the essence of this person. I'm surprised and disappointed you found issue with that. I would greatly appreciate any editorial help to bring this article into fruition. I have sourced the facts to great extent. I wish to upload to the Commons a marriage certificate to prove when she married Joseph Conforte and Nevada Athletic Commission boxing contracts from the early 1980s to use as proof of Sally's boxing program. Do you foresee an issue with such public records?Owilli2019 (talk) 01:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page Review

Hi! Thank you for your outstanding contribution to the Wikipedia community. Can you review that article, if you will be able to? It just stalled all my work. I would highly appreciate this. Thanks! MarcusTraianus (talk) 19:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ben DeLaurentis Notability

Hi Bkissin. Wanted to ask about your declination of my article creation on Ben Delaurentis. You declined for notability reasons, but I included many references to local and national coverage that he has received. That coverage has been "reliable," is "not self-published," and have been entirely independent of the musician. I understand that this musician is not widely known nationally, but is very prevalent and well-known within Central Virginia, and I think the coverage (and citation) reflects that sufficiently enough that it qualifies under #1 of Wikipedia:NMUSIC. If you disagree, could you please clarify why you think otherwise?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webbsledge (talk • contribs) 21:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A thank you

Hello Bkissin, I wanted to thank you for letting me know about Draft:Ft. Worth massive car pileup. That was a really nice thing you did. Thank you. Elijahandskip (talk) 20:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Christian Weston Chandler article

How exactly is he not notable? He's been covered and referenced by PewDiePie, Sega, Harry Partridge, and others. There are multiple videos of him on YouTube with views in the hundreds of thousands and even millions. How is Laz-D notable and not Chris? I have reposted this in case you haven't seen the first one. Cbswagman (talk) 04:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&oldid=1007382829"