Jump to content

User:Jrfep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jrfep (talk | contribs) at 10:21, 7 March 2021 (Reference templates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

J. R. Fe. P.


Reference templates

[edit]

Ramirez-Llodra, E; Keith, DA (2020). "M3.7 Chemosynthetic-based-ecosystems (CBE)". In Keith, D.A.; Ferrer-Paris, J.R.; Nicholson, E.; Kingsford, R.T. (eds.). The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.13.en. ISBN 978-2-8317-2077-7.

C Linardich and DA Keith. (2020). ‘M2.4 Abyssopelagic ocean waters’. In: Keith, D.A., Ferrer-Paris, J.R., Nicholson, E. and Kingsford, R.T. (eds.) (2020). The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.

Linardich, C; Keith, DA (2020). "M2.4 Abyssopelagic ocean waters". In Keith, D.A.; Ferrer-Paris, J.R.; Nicholson, E.; Kingsford, R.T. (eds.). The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.13.en. ISBN 978-2-8317-2077-7.

E Ramirez-Llodra, AA Rowden, AJ Jamieson, IG Priede and DA Keith. (2020). ‘M3.6 Hadal trenches and troughs’. In: Keith, D.A., Ferrer-Paris, J.R., Nicholson, E. and Kingsford, R.T. (eds.) (2020). The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.

Ramirez-Llodra, E; Rowden, AA; Jamieson, AJ; Priede, IG; Keith, DA (2020). "M3.6 Hadal trenches and troughs". In Keith, D.A.; Ferrer-Paris, J.R.; Nicholson, E.; Kingsford, R.T. (eds.). The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.13.en. ISBN 978-2-8317-2077-7.

Keith, DA (2020). "T5. Deserts and semi-deserts biome". In Keith, D.A.; Ferrer-Paris, J.R.; Nicholson, E.; Kingsford, R.T. (eds.). The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.13.en. ISBN 978-2-8317-2077-7.

Watermeyer, KE; Gregr, EJ; Rykaczewski, RR; Shannon, LJ; Suthers, IM; Keith, DA (2020). "M1.9 Upwelling zones". In Keith, D.A.; Ferrer-Paris, J.R.; Nicholson, E.; Kingsford, R.T. (eds.). The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.13.en. ISBN 978-2-8317-2077-7.

To do from Ecological classification:

Classification schemes

[edit]

Following, a comparison of classification schemes and terms used in the study of the biotic and abiotic components of ecosystems and the Earth in ecology and other fields.[citation needed]

Ecology

[edit]

In ecology:[citation needed]

Biogeography

[edit]

In biogeography:[citation needed]

[edit]
[edit]

Zoogeography

[edit]

In zoogeography:[citation needed]

Phytogeography

[edit]

In phytogeography:[citation needed]

[edit]
[edit]

For the physiognomic approach, see Vegetation#Classifications.

For the association (phytosociological) approach, see Phytosociology#Classificatory traditions.

Physiography

[edit]

In physiography:[citation needed]

Geology

[edit]

In Geology:[citation needed]

Pedology

[edit]

In pedology:

Climatology

[edit]

Köppen (1884)

[edit]
  • Main climate group, 5 groups, 1st letter
    • Type of precipitation pattern, 2nd letter
      • Subtype, degree of summer heat, 3rd letter

Other

[edit]


Examples of implementations

[edit]

"Ecological land classification" as understood in this article, is approximate with the biogeographical and ecological regionalisations in a scientific context (see biogeographic units).

However, its actual usage is more approximate with a tool used for land management, in the context of environmental resource management.[1][2]

In Canada ecological land classification schemes are commonly used.[3] Provincial authorities have adopted methods to classify ecosystems within various ecoregions of the province. Ontario is one such province that uses an extensive method to define ecological units.[4] Improvements in hand held technology have allowed for more efficient collection of vegetation and physiological data in the field, such as with the ELC eTool.[5]


This user has been on Wikipedia for 14 years, 7 months and 20 days.
This user comes from Venezuela.

(in Spanish)

  1. ^ Miller, M.R. 1981. Ecological land classification terrestrial subsystem: a basic inventory system for planning and management on the Mark Twain National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region. 56 pp., [1].
  2. ^ Williamson, J. C., Bestelmeyer, B. T., McClaran, M. P., Robinett, D., Briske, D. D., Wu, X. B., & Fernández-Giménez, M. E. (2016). Can ecological land classification increase the utility of vegetation monitoring data?. Ecological Indicators 69: 657–666.
  3. ^ Wicken, E. B. 1986. Terrestrial ecozones of Canada. Environment Canada. Ecological Land Classification Series No. 19. Lands Directorate, Ottawa. 26 pp.
  4. ^ "Introduction to ecological land classification systems". Queen’s Printer for Ontario. May 3, 2019.
  5. ^ [2].