Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killer Ds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 2003 Texas redistricting. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Killer Ds[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPLIT. This article doesn't go into a whole lot of detail or demonstrate mostly independent notability that would require a separation from the main article, 2003 Texas redistricting. A considerable portion of the article is more dedicated to a list of state politicians who were involved in the event, which could easily be merged into the aforementioned main article without any problems. Love of Corey (talk) 09:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I am also nominating the following related pages because they are also small, useless articles revolving around 2003 Texas redistricting that do not appear to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SPLIT:

Love of Corey (talk) 10:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge together Killer Ds, Texas Five, Texas Eleven as new article called 2003 Texas redistricting walkouts, or alternatively merge all to 2003 Texas redistricting. These walkouts are some of the most notable examples of quorum-busting in recent US history, but even then it's overkill to have 3 separate articles. In my opinion 1 article would suffice, but if people think that is too much, I would be willing to accept merging to the 2003 Texas redistricting. Sourcing definitely needs to be improved. - 188.182.13.127 (talk) 15:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I actually tried doing that first, but the lack of sourcing between all three articles in question made it impossible to create a decent, well-sourced article, hence my decision to file an AfD discussion instead. Love of Corey (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all Would all fit fine in 2003 Texas redistricting. Reywas92^Talk 19:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all into 2003 Texas redistricting, as they can adequately be discussed at that article and would add useful detail to it. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all into 2003 Texas redistricting as this would be the best solution. Sliekid (talk) 16:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all per above. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.