User talk:Praxidicae

This is Praxidicae's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29: 14 days

"Cause I've met some people, okay? Real people, and I've got to tell you, a lot of them are fucking idiots" - Selina Meyer

Eggxidicae :)

——Serial 16:20, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Damn I really missed that opportunity. VAXIDICAE💉 16:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Love the latest. No excuse not to get them returns in! :) ——Serial 14:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Godfather

Thank you for intervening in this matter. On reflection, I consider myself to have behaved badly. Please accept my apology.
I shall put it down to being a grumpy old man who will be 79 in under two weeks.
Regards, Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 8:25 pm, Today (UTC+1)

Gareth Griffith-Jones No worries, I would just request that you and the other user stick to the talk page for now. Happy early birthday! TAXIDICAE💰 19:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dearest sweet Praxie

I got my first dose Pfizer today. I wish you (#1 best), Drmies (#2), TBaloney (#3), and GeneralNotability (#4) good healths and good weekend! --IHeartPraxieMost (talk) 21:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stay, healthy my friend! I got my second Pfizer last Wednesday! ♥. TAXIDICAE💰 21:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky! I've got my first Moderna dose tomorrow! Bkissin (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck, I've not heard great things about the side effects for that one! TAXIDICAE💰 18:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Man, sometimes life just isn't fair – the only username I got today was BAD BLABLUBBS. :/ Blablubbs|talk 21:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hossein Mohammadi Vahidi

Hello. I wanted to know why you deleted this article? New resources and a new award have been added to this article, which proves the reputation. What is the reason for this?--Jackpet11 (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per the giant blinking notice: I'm not an administrator, I didn't delete your article and can't undelete it. TAXIDICAE💰 17:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nats literally being referred to as husband by his wife, with her consistently using he/him pronouns for him

Why do you want to pretend that evidence that proves that Nats uses he/him pronouns doesn't exist? When his wife has made multiple videos in which she either refers to him as her husband, uses he/him pronouns when referring to him, or does both in the same video, I'd argue that's a fair indication of which of us is right...

Great, until that person does so themselves, it shouldn't be changed. TAXIDICAE💰 18:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carolyn Aronson draft

Rednikki (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Carolyn Aronson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! I would love some specific pointers as to how I can improve the Carolyn Aronson article. I want to add her in order to improve Wikipedia's female representation in its entrepreneurs area, in particular women who are not in tech. She is one of the most successful female entrepreneurs so seemed like a good starting point. I used pages such as Jesse Genet, Cindy Eckert, Emily Weiss and Estée_Lauder_(businesswoman) as models. I would like to learn from you so I can create more pages about female entrepreneurs such as Sabrina Tan and Rea Ann Silva that will hopefully pass muster for inclusion. Rednikki (talk) 20:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rednikki (talk) 20:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

You warned User:Rtyggu for edit war. He is still destroying Wikipedia artiles. Please block this user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaheer Don Zaheer Don (talk • contribs) 09:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not doing any vandalism. Just making the article a standard Wikipedia article instead of a fan blog. Rtyggu (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, a user name Zaheer Don Zaheer Don, adding content to Becky Lynch article like a fanboy. Contents in "Impact and legacy" section are unnecessary. Those contents can be add on other sections. And it's unnecessary to add biggest and highest paid at same time. That guy have no manner how to talk and refer me as fanboy when he is the one who edit like a like a fanboy. Please warn him to edit like standard editor. Rtyggu (talk) 09:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit

Hello, I request you to re edit this. [[1]]. I added these information along with reliable citation. I have no idea why you remove the content. Articles like Becky Lynch and Charlotte Flair also have similar sections. So I request you to add this section in the article. Thank you Rtyggu (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I never added any information without reliable citation. So why you removed the section? Please re add the section. Thank you Rtyggu (talk) 12:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You warn me for edit war. When I only added proper facts along with reference. You can see this [2] I added citations in every important place. Then you removed this? Rtyggu (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still waiting for your answer. Why you remove the section from one article but not from other? Please re add the section.Rtyggu (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept this humble token

		The Surreal Barnstar
		For the best ever !vote at AfD Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 16:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sockpuppetry

Can you take a look at this talk page (Talk:Oliver C Beats#Contested deletion) and tell me what you think? Nehme₁₄₉₉ 19:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Praxidicae moved page YSN Flow to Draft:YSN Flow without leaving a redirect: Not ready for mainspace, incubate in draftspace (via script) undo thank"

Hi Prax. Yeah, no problems with that. Still wondering when Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Praxidicae will become a blue link. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tramp_Stamps_(band) AFD Suggestion

I Request you to please share your opinion, Your knowledge is pretty good. I observed the dates of the news and all are in the last 10-12 days. For me, this is more like an overnight sensation. I just want to improve my understanding that's why I am asking you. Sonofstar (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your edit on my second article, and for being nice about the mistake in sourcing!

Andro fred (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar

There's no barnstar out there in the world that could reflect on how much work and dedication you've put into Wikiepdia. But, the reason why I'm giving you this barnstar is that I want to think you for your layout on your talk page with all of the names of innocent black lives killed just because of the color of their skin. I'm relieved and grateful to find another user who has the same perspective on the whole sensitive matter that has affected the country — and beyond. So again, thank you for the layout! Jack Reynolds (talk to me | email me) 12:39, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am a paid contributor. I have disclosed on my user page

Hello Sir, I am a paid contributor. I have disclosed on my user page. Is it correctly disclosed or is there something else? Please remove the tag/disclaimer from my pages regarding paid disclosure.Pakvision (talk) 01:38, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Except that isn't your Freelancer that you linked to, Pakvision. But that's your MO, same as the last dozen accounts. Nice try. TAXIDICAE💰 13:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am really very sorry if you're serious and hurt about my work on"Foreign relations of India"

Sorry for my actions, if that hurts you. Actually, I'd been planning all these since a couple of months. Actually, I thought that the the relations articles should be based on their geographic locations. According to my geographic knowledge, countries located on left and up of India should have their names before India in their relations with India article, while countries having right and down positions geographically should have the names 'after' India. That was all my target. Thank you. Have a nice day. Utkarsh555 (talk) 14:00, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Praxadicae

Hello my friend, i saw you moved the page Balma (DJ) back to draft, and saw it and try to format it accordingly. I´m sorry if i made a mistake while editing it. Would like to politely invite you to reconsider the speedy deleting.

Thanks in advance for your time, service and patience.

Best Regards. INGEK1 (talk) 15:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Ranveer Allahbadia

Greetings. I see that you nominated the page mentioned above for speedy deletion, however this should not be the case as there are plenty of relevant references that allow for notability. The individual is a famous youtuber, AND has the number 1 podcast in Spotify India.... Number 1. According to you, if this doesn't warrant an article, what does? Kindly remove the nomination for deletion as it is very clearly out of order. Best regards.

No, I won't be removing it. TAXIDICAE💰 19:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The references are quite relevant, and so is the article. This is disruptive editing on your behalf.

The references are, for lack of a better word, garbage. They are not independent or in depth coverage. This isn't disruptive editing. This is a normal Wikipedia process. It was deleted after a discussion and it's a raging advertisement. TAXIDICAE💰 19:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to you the following are "Garbage": -Forbes India -The Times of India -Hindustan Times -Republic World I did not create a previous version of the article, but if this gets deleted I will be truly shocked.--The inquisitive reader (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forbes is a contributor piece, RW is deprecated per WP:RSP, The TOI article is garbage and vanity spam, and TOI is not considered to be truly reliable and HT is a piece written by him. Next. TAXIDICAE💰 19:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you tutor me?

Hello Praxidicae, would like to know if you would consider tutoring me by any chance? So i don't commit the sames mistakes and previously warned by you before. I love editing and contributing, hopefully i can do better!

Thanks in advance, Best Regards.

Brexit Edits

Hi Praxidicae, I noticed you removed our edits to the Brexit site concerning potential Russian interference for being "not remotely neutral." Could you please explain your reasoning? I would argue that CSIS is a reputable source. Any insight would be much appreciated!

Thanks, McAdamsFanClub (talk) 18:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AD Maddox

Hello, I am not a paid contributor to AD Maddox (A.D. Maddox). Yodielay (talk) 18:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moved SuperRare back to draft.

Hey the article for SuperRare has sources from Forbes, Time Magazine, Fortune Magazine, Yahoo Finance, and HypeBeast. I am working on adding more sources right now but I just figured I would let you know why I do believe it meets the Wiki criteria for being an article and that is the only reason I moved it. I will keep updating it and once I reach 8-11 sources I will update you and see if you think it is ready for review. Thank you for the update. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mildlycake (talk • contribs) 16:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forbes is a contributor piece and Yahoo is a press release, the rest aren't in depth coverage. TAXIDICAE💰 16:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the guidelines and updating the article I believe it is ready for review. However, you stated that the rest are not "in-depth" coverage leading me to believe you did not read them but the Wiki guidlines institute that, "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." I also reviewed Wiki Reliable sources page and it mentioned nothing about contributor sources being unreliable. Therefore, I do not believe the fact that the Forbes article being written by a contributor matters in terms of creditability because a FORBES editor still has to approve the article before it is published on their site. Please review the draft again and if you still believe it is not credible then I suggest you read the wiki guidelines and provide me with an in depth review as to what issues you have found. Keep in mind that the guidelines also state, "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected." Mildlycake (talk) 18:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flat Earth

Hello, Praxidicae,

When you are correcting a bad move or vandalism, could you please leave a redirect? When the bad move happens, the bots change all of the redirects to point to the wrong page. If you leave a redirect when you correct the move, then the bots can change back all of the redirects back to the correct location. Without a redirect, then all of the changes have to be reverted manually (see User:AnomieBOT III/Broken redirects). If one of our patrolling editors doesn't correct the redirects listed on the broken redirect page, then AnomieBOT III will just delete them. Leaving a redirect after a bad move is really only essential for popular articles where there might be dozens of redirects directed to them. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]