Jump to content

User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

Atto Abdulkarim Abbas

My ignorance of football is profound and I frankly like to keep it that way. But if it's true that this guy has played in the Super Lig, doesn't that make him notable according to WP:NFOOTBALL, since it's a fully professional league? On the other hand, a quick google shows that sourcing that fact might be rather difficult. At any rate, to my mind it makes G4 inappropriate (though I see now that User:Primefac disagrees).

I agree that the sudden appearance of Ppfoot for the sole purpose of disputing CSD templates on these articles is starting to look rather feathered-beaked-and-webbed-footed, but strictly speaking Ppfoot had every right to remove CSD templates, which any editor other than the page creator can do for any reason (though I see now that User:KrakatoaKatie disagrees). I'm not about to dish out a block for edit-warring, but I'd at least like to hear your thoughts on the NFOOTBALL issue above. GoldenRing (talk) 13:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

GoldenRing, I was going mainly on the AFD, which closed two months ago. At that time there was no evidence that he had played in a pro league, and I couldn't find any verification of the new information (which says he debuted before the AFD happened). In other words, it really looked like the creator had read the AFD, seen the criteria (must be in pro league) and made something up. If I'm wrong about that, I'm happy to restore. Primefac (talk) 13:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
I'm also not convinced there's not some socking going on here – this guy is at the top of my list. Any article about Nigerian or Ghanian football is suspect, particularly if it's been recreated in this manner. I don't have time right now to run CU on him but I intend to when I get back this afternoon. Katietalk 14:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank's for your help earlier with the advertising/promo person. You rock! -- Dane talk 03:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Request on 16:17:49, 19 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Chloeandisabel


Hi! I am the user who is creating the page for Chloe + Isabel, and would love to know if you have any additional comments on why the initial page was rejected, and what the steps are to get a page into a "space" where it can be edited but not deleted. Thank you very much!

Chloeandisabel (talk) 16:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Chloeandisabel, in the interest of good faith (and saving you the trouble of re-finding all those reference links) I've restored your draft. The main concern Chrissymad had was with the (sorry to be honest) blatant promotion that was rampant in the draft. Some of the more egregious phrases I removed were things like "Chloe + Isabel products are produced by the world's best-known manufacturers..." and "...dedicated to empowering the next generation of entrepreneurs..." - Wikipedia isn't a social media or marketing platform. It is designed to summarize what other people have said about a subject, in a neutral tone free of promotion.
For example, Their original designs are sold exclusively through a nationwide network of c+i small business owners known as Merchandisers could be re-written using exactly the same information as They sell their designs through a nationwide network of small-business franchises. All the facts, none of the promotion.
As an additional note, your username is promotional (we don't accept usernames that represent a company), so you'll have to request a username change at WP:CHUS. For example, "User:ACME" isn't acceptable, but "User:Jane at ACME" is okay. Alternately, of course, you can make something up like my username.
As a final note, if you work for Chloe+Isabel, you must disclose this on your userpage. The easiest way is to put the {{paid}} template on your userpage (which would look like {{paid|employer=Chloe + Isabel}}. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 17:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)


Thank you very much for helping out with those suggestions and saving that edit with the references. I am having some trouble with the citations. Is there a way to save my edits but not fully "re-submit" the article? I want to allow more editors to comment but don't want the full page to be rejected again. There doesn't seem to be any button other than "save changes" which re-submits the full article again, from what I understand.

Again, thank you so much for your help here! I also requested a new name and followed the other suggestions you put in place.

Chloeandisabel (talk) 19:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Lauren

Chloeandisabel, your draft is not currently submitted for review, so as long as you don't click the "resubmit" button on the decline notice the draft will stay un-submitted. Primefac (talk) 19:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Six Sigma and Six Theta Design

Dear Six Sigma and Six Theta Design are two differnt designs in the mechanical Engineering. You have said Six Sigma and Six Theta Design are same thing. The Six Theta framework was created to improve and synthesize mechanical designs by offering KPIs and objective methods into mechanical design, which would give engineers a tool for comparing and improving their mechanical designs. Lubna.Iram (talk) 12:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Article isn't a duplicate, but has been taken to AFD. Primefac (talk) 13:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

oh, great.

Now the Monty Python Spam skit is playing in my head. Especially the Vikings. Dlohcierekim 14:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Keep up the good work on the new page patrolling :) Skamecrazy123 (talk) 20:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury

Had second look, now more G11 than before, and I have reversed myself. Dlohcierekim 21:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

A wine for you!

A wine for you!
Figured you could use it while dealing with all the socks in the world. Thanks for your help with everything, including tolerating my silly questions in IRC. (Sorry, I couldn't find a wine box image ^_^). Cheers! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 22:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello May I talk

Hello there! My donator Damian had informed me about a Fake user using his details The User is Steeldayena and had posted an article about our up coming Game Zombie Nvation If you could remove the user or article that be much appreciated Thanks -Lewis Blair Lewis Blair (talk) 23:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Others blocks

I am not usually involved in sockpuppet investigations. The bureaucracy involved... The one on LowKeyFame has just been closed, with no action taken on the other five. I have blocked all of them, as obvious.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Regarding Actual Seo Media I see what you mean. Thanks for notifying MassiveYR ♠ 22:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Request on 10:13:21, 25 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Ambalika.gandhi9


Hello CHrissymad, I read your message on the page deletion chat. Could you please elaborate on the point - not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. The comment says that my page looks promotional and hence it is not going to be published. PLease tell me exactly what sites are looking promotional. Also, what is the next step to take here?? Need your guidance Looking forward to your reply Thank You Regards Ambalika Gandhi

TravelTriangle (talk) 10:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thank you for fixing vandalism for my updates of Daniel Wanjiru. That was very nice of you.

I don't know how to stop that vandal but I noticed that vandal account is now blocked. SWP13 (talk) 05:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Need help

Hello! Since the article I created (and did not polish and finish) was deleted and I failed to save the content I was working on, I would be really grateful if you could just send me the text I was working on, so I can revise the mistakes I made myself and work on them. Thank you! The article's name was Digital Arrow, Speedy deletion nominated 16:29 25 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DA Klara (talk • contribs)

DA Klara, your page was deleted as being a copyright violation, so there's really not much point in restoring it (since it would have to be immediately deleted again). I highly suggest you use the Article wizard to create a draft, which will then be reviewed by experienced editors upon submission (this is also a necessity, as the Digital Arrow page has been protected from creation). Please remember that all Wikipedia pages must be written in your own words - copying directly from other sources isn't allowed. Primefac (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

"De Novo" disambiguation page

Hi, Chrissymad... Hard to tell if this is the appropriate way to respond to your note to me earlier, but please take note of the entry I made to the Talk page for "De Novo" in response to your removal of the link in my entry on that page... thanks. Ericp-nh (talk) 16:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Ericp-nh I've already responded on the talk page of the DAB. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for helping out patrolling the new pages. We both seem to be on the same page today. You have been catching issues on same pages as I have. Thanks again! Reb1981 (talk) 21:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

2FA

2FA should be open for you now; see Wikipedia:Simple 2FA for the easy start guide. — xaosflux Talk 12:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks and done, Xaosflux! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brenthurst Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foundation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
  • Japan 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
  • Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Kamruddin Haji

Thanks for the note. Still, unless the creating user is currently blocked as a sock of someone who was blocked before the page was created, it shouldn't be deleted as G5. G5's never an emergency by itself, so unless it qualifies for speedy deletion under some other criterion, we won't suffer by having it around until a sockblock's imposed. The point, I believe, is that those most familiar with the case should be judging — if the creator isn't blocked, either the CUs (and others at SPI) haven't yet been able to weigh in, or they've decided that it's not a case of illegitimate socking. Either way, the user hasn't been deemed a problematic sock, and therefore its creations shouldn't be G5 deleted. Nyttend (talk) 14:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Harassment Warning

I don't appreciate your behavior on my talk page. Your attention towards me is unwanted. This is the first and only warning. Please acknowledge people as human and treat them fairly as such. Personal attacks are against the non-discrimination policy. Moreover, there are zero justifications for personal attacks. Some of your accusations towards me are unwarranted. When I make a mistake, I am happy to adjust my actions. However, I will not allow online harassment. I am disappointed by your actions because this type of behavior creates an environment where diversity is unlikely.Noisavni (talk) 19:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

@Noisavni: What personal attack? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Noisavni, just as a thought, civil behaviour is a two-way street. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
I agree with Primefac. I reviewed all that was said even on Noisavni talkpage. Chrissymad just gave the standard warnings and also gave advise. There was no harrassment or personal attack. Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:UW. Reb1981 (talk) 20:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Woah - what happened to the Article I was working on.

I know it needed work as I was actively bringing in sources but why did you delete ALL of it? Learningmaster (talk)

Learningmaster There were several issues with this article, the first being quite a few significant copyright violations, hence the revision deletion. The second being the rather promotional and non-encyclopedic nature of the rest. I'd recommend you draft in your sandbox or through WP:AFC rather than in mainspace or you run the risk of deletion, however copyrighted content still cannot be added to a draft. When creating new sections on talk pages, please create them on the bottom. Thanks. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Thank you for your help. Reb1981 (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank You.

I have been hoping for a second opinion. I was trying to help him out, but he thinks I am going after him. I will check more carefully next time on the generation. Regardless he should have let due process happen, instead of edit-waring. I have no problem admitting when I am wrong. Again thank you! Also I did not see he had removed the list. Reb1981 (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

no worries! And yes it was inappropriate to edit war on both ends. Let it be a lesson learned. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Improving of Bint Al Bilaad

Ok, I wont remove the reviews. Please, tell me how can I add in reference section? All sources that I add, automatically end up in external links. I have seen external links (like mine) present in reference section. Please guide. Zeeshantariq01 (talk) 12:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

heh

on the other hand Dlohcierekim 15:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

re:

Exuse me, i'm not doing it again Boeing329 (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Boeing329 I have no idea what you are doing but leave my talk page, as well as other people's user pages alone unless you need to communicate about the project - adding banners saying that a user is away or adding personal details is 100% not okay and this is my only warning to you - do not do it again. You are being disruptive. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:16, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Let's Have A Conversation. I Won't Do It, You Don't Put Messages On My Talk Page And The Other Person Please.Boeing329 (talk) 16:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Boeing329 You misunderstand how Wikipedia works - it is a collaborative environment and I asked you to stop being disruptive, this is what talk pages are for. I think it's probably best if you stop contacting me unless it involves the project or my conduct as an editor. K? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:32, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Nas Daily

I'm thinking of taking this to WP:AFD. Your thoughts? Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 20:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Nicnote I think the whole thing is ridiculous but I would probably file a report at WP:COIN first. It's clear by all the things I've pointed out already that this is an SPA with an undisclosed COI. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
@Chrissymad: How silly (not going to use stronger language) do you have to be to write down the whole plan of your WP:SOAP in a publicly accessible Wikipedia article? They are seriously lucky that SoWhy assumed good faith, but I personally thought that this went beyond any GF of any human on this planet. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 20:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Nicnote I honestly have nothing of value to add to it right now so I'm gonna keep my mouth shut. You should join IRC CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Good idea! Which channel? Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 20:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Nicnote #wikipedia-en connect for now! :) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

ACC tool access request approved

Chrissymad, thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I have verified that you are identified to the Wikimedia Foundation and approved your request.

You may now access the interface here pending a tool root marking your account as identified in the tool database. Before you begin handling requests, please ensure you have read and understood the account creation guide and username policy to familiarise yourself with the process.

Please subscribe yourself to the private ACC mailing list following the instructions on that page. I also advise that you also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and you can get real time advice on how to handle requests.

Please note failure to correctly assess requests will result in suspension of tool access. Account creation is not a race, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Releasing personally identifying information (such as IP and email addresses), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated very seriously and will generally result in immediate suspension.

Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, and you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked as "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM/ACC.

Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome!  FastLizard4 (talk•contribs) 22:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keith Petruzzelli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilbraham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

James Dorsa

I think Danny Star was trying, in good faith, to fix the copyvio. It looks like his edit, which is now the current text at James Dorsa, is clean of copyvio of the csun profile. Do you concur? —C.Fred (talk) 19:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: City of sound

Hello Chrissymad. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of City of sound, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: existed since 2009, claims favorable reviews in multiple notable magazines. Take to WP:AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 19:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

21:30:15, 6 May 2017 review of submission by TynniMay


Hi Chrissymad, thanks for reviewing my submission on Steven Lang, Writer, and I apologise for not getting the citations right, this is my first time on Wikipedia and I'm finding it all a little overwhelming. Could you please let me know which citations specifically aren't correct so that I can correct them? That would be much appreciated, regards, TynniMay TynniMay (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

جبران خليل جبران

You tagged this article as an attack page. What did the actual content read? Google translate gave me "<person's name> is a lover who loved the great customer lived and grew up living a parrot." Home Lander (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Home Lander translation said name "is a bitch prostitute he loved and lived the great Zub grew up an existence Acharaamit" - I can't say for sure that it's correct but I wouldn't think that a translation would be uh...so far off. Those are two very specific words. ;) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Strange... it must be the phrase "lover" that is suspect here. What translator do you use? Home Lander (talk) 21:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) While I got a similar translation to Home Lander, the page does exist on ar-wiki so I've gone ahead and deleted as A2. Primefac (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
Home Lander I did the built in one on Chrome which strangely, is different than the google translation but I also did the Microsoft translation which gave "Name is salacious he liked big customers lived and grew up living ungrateful" which sounds like an insult at the very least. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Interesting, all this goes to show the difficulty of translating non-English content. Home Lander (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Chrissy

I am writing an article on Kevin lee. A very talented Actor and quite well established now here in CHina. One of very many foreign actors whom has a name for him self and has achieved quite a lot. I'm actually quite a big fan of Kevin's and feel he honestly deserves to have an articles on wiki.

I recently added some notable sources ( Kevin Lee was the first foreign actor to of had his face on not one, but now two movie posters)

Really hope you could reconsider my request. I am looking at continually following Kevin's career with constant updates to wiki.

Regards Emily Jones — Preceding unsigned comment added by ForeignActors (talk • contribs) 17:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

14:08:45, 7 May 2017 review of submission by RED Revolution


This is the first article I have created. I am doing it on behalf of photographer Katarina Benzova. I do not understand what additional information i am required to give on resources as I have used the two references i have.

RED Revolution Hello, the issue is that the only sources you used were primary sources. Articles should be supported by independent reliable sources. Additionally, given your relationship with the subject, please review the conflict of interest policy.CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

20:15:49, 7 May 2017 review of submission by 75.110.228.169


Hey! Thanks for reviewing! Can you help me understand what wasn't notable on this page?75.110.228.169 (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

None of the sources you provided cover the subject of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

15:04, 26 April 2017 review of Weimar Porzellan

Hello, thanks for reviewing my article. This was my first English article and I want to learn, how I have to write a correct article. Please could you explain me, which parts of my version were more commercial than the previous version? It is a one-to-one translation of the german article. Thank you for your helping answer. Aaron Schöler (talk) 06:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Rehmat Aziz Chitrali Gold Medalist

Please do not delete my personal page i am very famous person. I am scientist lawyer and wikipedia staff working in wikipedia foundation since 2008. I had also created Khowar wikipedia.(Rachitrali 11:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rehmat Aziz Chitrali (talk • contribs)

22:18:14, 8 May 2017 review of submission by Chosenonefilms


hey Chrissymad, my name is jason, i am new to wiki as you can tell. I currently work for Twin River Casino in marketing and in my spare time i work on creating new games. i just finished the game in question. sent it off to Charles Mousseau who owns Total gaming science (a very big name in the gaming industry - his company is in the page i created at the bottom) as well as just sent my original packet to the united states patent office. Im not sure what else i could do to prove that all of this is real. I am currently in talks to sell the game to SHFL entertainment- but its hard to show them more when this gets denied, ya know? please let me know what i did wrong or what i can help prove that i own the article. This website is amazing and im looking forward to contributing more. thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chosenonefilms (talk • contribs) 22:18:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't a marketing tool. We're not here to sell anything. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia that summarizes what other people have said about a company. This means that often times new companies simply don't meet our criteria. Good luck with your new game! Primefac (talk) 11:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Why dis you reverse whatever I edited regarding Tunisha sharma

I even provided the credible citation that was from popular hindi newspaper article Dhainik Baskar and recently even Tunisha sharma the actress herself posted that she is 15 YR old so I made changes only after proper research on Tunisha sharma my favourite actress then what made you revert the credible citation ???? Check your facts (talk) 11:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Check your facts The link you included did not even mention the subjects name much less her DOB. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

13:45:26, 11 May 2017 review of submission by 27.147.206.75


This is an English daily newspaper of Bangladesh, why it is deleted. This is an approved by Bangladesh Government of Department of Films & Publications - (চলচ্চিত্র ও প্রকাশনা অধিদপ্তর). This the link as a reference.

http://dfp.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dfp.portal.gov.bcd/page/415b6d7c_437f_4e1e_a541_aa5c33be9d01/List%20of%20Registered%20newspapers%20(March%202017)-%20B.pdf

I see there are wikipedia page of other newspaper, e.g., Daily_Sun_(Bangladesh), The Daily Star (Bangladesh) but its not included yet over wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't a marketing tool. We're not here to sell anything. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia that summarizes what other people have said about a company. This means that often times new companies simply don't meet the criteria.

http://dfp.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dfp.portal.gov.bcd/page/415b6d7c_437f_4e1e_a541_aa5c33be9d01/List%20of%20Registered%20newspapers%20(March%202017)-%20B.pdf CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Merely existing isn't a satisfaction of our inclusion criteria. What you've listed are essentially, well, listings. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (periodicals). CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Question re reverting Lyme Regis Museum

Hello there,

I am brand new to Wikipedia, and am finding my way around with the help of the help pages - so I apologise in advance if I have broken any rules with my edit of Lyme Regis Museum's Wikipedia entry. I attempted to update the entry and add information about the history of the museum and the current changes it is undergoing. Can I ask why this was reverted please?

Many thanks,

Lyme Regis Museum Marketing (talk) 13:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Lyme Regis Museum Marketing The content was not encyclopedic in tone and was a very close paraphrasing/copyvio of content from the museum itself. Please also see the username policy as well as the policy on conflicts of interest. Cheers!CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

15:53:47, 11 May 2017 review of submission by Smstuckey


I was confused as to why the article was rejected. I have multiple independent and reliable references to the event. The first and second references explain the history of the event.

What else would I need to add to make this a more "notable" event?

Thanks for your input, Smstuckey (talk) 15:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)smstuckey

Smstuckey While there are some sources, they're entirely local and not really coverage but interviews or mentions. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

———Chrissymad I believe it fits the definition of "earned media coverage". Additionally, I don't think Wikipedia mentions that using only "local" news is insufficient, and the event has recurred over a period of several years. Even though the first and second sources are interviews, I thought it gave a brief but adequate description of how the event originated. Compare it to the page for the Charm City Bluegrass Festival, which exists... Smstuckey (talk) 18:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)smstuckey

Smstuckey Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The CCBFCC is a notable topic because the coverage comes from independent reliable sources and they've won notable awards. The patch, etc...are hardly qualified as major coverage and WJZ is borderline as it's a local affiliate only. I am very familiar with all of these sources as they are all my local stations etc...but aside from that, most of the sources aren't in-depth coverage. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Interviews

Thanks for the link; an interesting read. I've gone for a delete vote now - I don't think there's enough out there to salvage the article despite my best efforts.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Her age was first itself mentioned in the newspaper article but still you reverted it..what the hell??😂😂😂😂then what's the use of edit option if you guys are reverting the changes..😂😂 Check your facts (talk) 02:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Keith Johnson (Author)

Hello Chrissymad,

I see that you removed 5000+ characters from this article, which I recently submitted. And you removed 26 or so of the 61 links/references. Can I ask why ? So I can understand what I need to avoid in my future edits. Thanks in advance!

Best wishes, Caltheon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caltheon (talk • contribs) 11:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

I have joined wikipedia only to make changes on Tunisha sharma age

And I have given reliable source.The actress herself recently in an interview stated she is 15 YR old and is in 9th std. This was the latest interview she gave to punjabi media. It's also uploaded in youtube. And she herself on her birthday recently gave an hashtag stating she is 15 YR old on Instagram, facebook , Twitter . Thats why I decided to make changes. Check your facts (talk) 11:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Check your facts, the issue is that the sources you posted don't actually give her birth date. For example, someone who is currently 15 years old in 2017 could have been born in January 2002 or November 2003. We need a reliable source that verifies her actual birthday. If you can find her verified Twitter account that actually lists her birthday, we might be able to use that. Primefac (talk) 12:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Regarding my draft

Hello Crissymad, Thank you for your help till now, and correcting the mistakes I've made. My article 'Project Manas' was rejected as it didn't have reliable references. I've done some research and added a few more references. Project Manas is a student project, so procuring any more reliable sources is impossible.I've been waiting for a long time and I would appreciate it if you could give me an update on it. Below are the details of my submission. Category:AfC submissions by date/08 May 2017 Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bringing bits to life (talk • contribs) 11:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Bringing bits to life, your draft has exactly one reference (India Times) that goes into any detail about the group and isn't directly connected to the organization. Everything else is either PRIMARY (i.e. written by someone directly involved) or is just a brief one-paragraph mention in a list of other similar groups. You'll need to add more references that are not directly connected to the group, and talk in detail about them. Primefac (talk) 13:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
Hi Primefac, This is regarding my draft Project Manas. As we are a student project, emerged in 2014, we do not have any other references as such. Can you advise me as of what can I do next so that my article gets published. Thank you . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bringing bits to life (talk • contribs) 05:12, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Bringing bits to life, if all of the available sourcing is what's currently in the draft, then unfortunately your organization simply does not meet our inclusion criteria. Maybe there will be more sources in the future. Primefac (talk) 15:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Primefac, I have recently added three more references to my page, I request you to look into it and update if those references are adequate or more are needed. Also, My draft-Project Manas , got deleted some time back,I request you to grant me permission to access my draft in order to make a few corrections and send it to review. I am really looking forward to make the amendments and in order to do this, i need access to it.

Further help would be appreciated. Thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bringing bits to life (talk • contribs) 06:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Bringing bits to life, you'll have to talk to Dlohcierekim about that, since they were the deleting admin. Primefac (talk) 11:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Primefac, Thankyou for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bringing bits to life (talk • contribs) 12:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

J.LeGras

I dont understand why someone wants to delete the J.LeGras Page. Can you please help me.

This young man is a beginning musician. Please check links below to see credit. He also has new music coming out soon.


https://jlegras.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LeGrasMusic/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6eQqdcOP-OeudduHN9EATA Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/j.legras/


LeGrasMusic (talk) 17:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

LeGrasMusic, the key phrase in your question is "beginning musician". Wikipedia is not a place for people to "get noticed", nor is it a social media platform. We require coverage in reliable sources that talk in detail about LeGras. If you can find sources of this calibre, you are welcome to add them to the page and hopefully put off the deletion. Primefac (talk) 18:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Hi

Hi can you tell me what it means when it says that new users have been created automatically? Thanks. Plum3600 (talk) 19:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Plum3600 That happens when a user visits another Wikipedia from their "home" wiki. I'd also like to recommend against welcoming everyone until they've at least edited. Cheers! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

GPZ

Google GPZ and you'll see that the entry is valid. Sheesh... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.76.35.22 (talk) 23:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

97.76.35.22 DABs are not blind listings of everything that exists. Please see MOS:DAB. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of my article about Dacca Overseas Limited

Hello Chrissy

I recently tried submitting an article to wikipedia about the company I work for, and it was tagged for speedy deletion. I tried my best to present a neutral point of view and avoided all sorts of promotion. Any advise on any edits I can make to the article to be suitable for wikipedia will be highly appreciated. Ill atach the article below for your reference.

Thanks!

<article content removed by Primefac>

Kdayef (talk) 12:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Kdayef, my first suggestion would be to not post your article on someone's talk page. My second suggestion would be to use the Article Wizard to create a draft, which will be reviewed by experienced editors after submission.
As for the content of your page, the opening paragraph wasn't too bad - it said what the company does and where they're located. It was the "Trading" section that was little more than a business profile or a promotional advert. We don't need a breakdown of every part of the company's responsibilities, and articles need to be written in a neutral point of view. Finally, you provided zero independent reliable sources that talked about the company. Wikipedia requires this for all articles (see The Golden Rule). If you can correct these issues, and if you use the Article Wizard, you will be much better off. Primefac (talk) 12:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

A cup of coffee for you!

Your anti-vandalism work is greatly appreciated (By people like me, at least)! Here's a cup of coffee to keep you going! —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Apology

I am requesting an Apology for your claiming my recent edit on an article was vandalism on my talk page.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm on day 4 My mistake for tagging it as vandalism however I do stand by the revert as it doesn't appear to meet inclusion criteria for a standalone article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
I guess that is fair enough, but I really think it should be an article. See: Humans Need Not Apply.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 18:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Also, may you remove the block warning on my talk page? You may remove my associated replies on my talk page if you would like also.--I'm on day 4 (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

OUAT pages

Hello. Is there anything that can be done about the people who keep sabotaging the Regina, Hook, and Emma pages to say that Emma and Regina are together? This is getting out of hand. They will not stop. These shippers are immature, insane, and ridiculous. Can we stop that person who recently sabotaged Regina and Hook?

I'll take a look and ask an admin. Emma and Regina were protected for quite a while, perhaps its time to indef... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

SJS again?

Remember SJS? have a look at this please. Cheers – GSS (talk|c|em) 14:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Moving article back to draft

You recently rejected User:Priti Saini/Shri Shantinath Temple and Seva Sansthan, Sangamner. The user bypassed AfC and had it created. The article was CSDed before she came to AfC. I do not want to take it to AfD as I believe it will only end with a suggestion to draftify. I tried messaging the user, besides removing the spammy content in the article to see if it elicits any response, but to no avail. Do you have any suggestions for this case. I believe it should be sent back to Draftspace to let her work on it, though I could not find any proper references myself. Jupitus Smart 06:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

It has been said

that A7 does not apply to schools, though I think it should. Have you had success w/ these? I haven't been bold enough to delete a school for A7.Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Dlohcierekim This is a for profit "school" that is actually a business, per their own admission (Atlantis College is a Cyprus business located in Liopetri, Famagusta. It can be found in our Cyprus University listing.) so it falls under db-corp. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

<<Rubs hands together and laughs evilly.>> Consensus seems to be moving back toward when I first started. Got it in the neck a couple of times for deleting or tagging things that would go quietly into the night now.Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Dlohcierekim I am all about taking the garbage out. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:31, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

That's why they gave me a mop and a bucket. Will wield it a little more freely.Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Request on 11:35:05, 20 May 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by HoundDog17



HoundDog17 (talk) 11:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC) Hi Chrissymad Thank you for reviewing my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Peter_Mylonas. You mentioned it's "not adequately supported by reliable sources". Could you please specify which points are not supported? Thank you Regards Barbara

Mortimer Common and MFM

Why have you elected to remove external links on the village web site Mortimer Common , to local voluntary groups who are relevant to that village?

One of those groups - MFM - who you seem determined to remove from the related disambiguation pages raised £558 for Prostate Cancer UK two weeks ago entirely thanks to the effort of volunteers

Non of this contravenes the rules you are expousing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njthec (talk • contribs) 18:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Njthec Wikipedia is not a soapbox and DABs are not for lists of everything that exists- they are navigation aids for Wikipedia. And the external links section is not for anything loosely related with the subject of an article. Please see WP:ELNO. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

So why have you left a cricket club on there and removed a music club and a listing of clubs- what's the difference? You appear to be quoting rules without applying them consistently.

Njthec My mistake, I'll gladly remove the rest. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

that's not what I wanted, your mistake was to removed the village partnership - the name of a group of volunteers that simply promotes village life - two wrongs don't make a right. I live in the village. are you suggesting I am doing something underhand by simply tidying up the listing. now thanks to your acts information has gone, to no gain, in the name of a rule book and apparently a level of flawed censorship I had no idea existed on here Njthec (talk) 21:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Njthec Just because something may be a good cause does not mean it is encyclopedic or belongs on Wikipedia. Removing promo or soapboxing certainly isn't the censorship you decry. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Njthec (talk) don't tell me you're going to take the history group off now as a soapbox

Njthec I will invite you again to read WP:ELNO. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Njthec (talk) so you leave an external site on called Mortimer village web site. if you click that link it will show you it is run by the group you just deleted.

Njthec You misunderstand how Wikipedia works. However this conversation needs to stop as it is not going anywhere productive. Thanks. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Njthec (talk) 21:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC) your application of the rule you quote is wrong. the village partnership is closely linked to the page subject and does not fail any of the criteria - granted I am relatively new to this, but I have read the rules and given I know the groups you are simply wrong.

Njthec I am no longer interested in continuing this conversation but if you'd like to find a solution, take it to the talk page of the article in question. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

what?

Doncha like music drama festivals? LOL Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Dlochierekim So much...on another note. I pretty much called it on this AN thing. I imagine we'll be back to normal in a few days and starting this cycle all over again. *sigh* CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Therapy

HI Chrissymad, Firstly, I hope you're enjoying the Cairribean (very jealous). There should be nothing fringe or promotional about the article about person-centered therapy - please compare it to those for other major types of therapy (CBT, psychodynamic, Gestalt etc). Each of these has a well-written article and I am merely bringing the article about Person-centered Therapy up to that quality. Note that some of those other articles are much bigger than mine. The original had many errors of omission, and quite a few of commission. It was an embarrassment to all in my field and would have had to be deleted anyway! It is important that there is a level playing field for 'rival' players in any given field, and that important information is not stiffled. Please feel free to read up about Person-centered Therapy (if my reference list is still available) - there is no good reason why it can't have an article as comprehensive and as helpful as those for other leading types of therapy. I am very happy to answer any Q's, but please know that I have just spent the second half of the day re-doing the work that was lost by the last deletion of my material - which is very frustrating. I would love to hear feedback about specific aspects of the article, but please please don't continue to erase the whole thing.

Regards, Mothy MothyHarvard (talk) 14:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Request on 15:12:30, 21 May 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by StillEvolving


Thanks for your fast response last night re Draft:Robert_G._Darling - yes I do know that it was flagged for copyright - but i have now rewritten it completely - I do know that you are busy though so do not expect instant help - just whenever you have time - thanks !! StillEvolving (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

StillEvolving (talk) 15:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

StillEvolving My last message to you was in error - the tool generated a false positive for a copyright violation. :) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


German kingship

I have created a talk page section where objections to the removal of the etymology section of this article can be made. 24.7.14.87 (talk) 00:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Reversion of Edit to Joshua Alan

It was requested that the edits to Joshua Alan's page be reverted as the they were done (presumably) by the spouse of one of the band members of Black Box 13. They made several edits in the past few days in what is believed to be in an effort to promote these former band members, hence the reason for the edits/reverting. The link to the award is fine (the past links were done incorrectly), but if it is seen that this person does this again (by placing the names of the past members in order to promote them and doing the links incorrectly), I will ensure to revert them. Thank you. Dijares (talk) 00:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

@Dijares: Where was this requested? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 10:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Dijares, even people with a conflict of interest are allowed (though strongly discouraged) to make edits to a page, provided it is neutral and sourced. While the original reference didn't verify the sources, it was fairly easy to find a source that verified the edits. Seeing as how the content is neutral and sourced, there is no reason to remove the content. Primefac (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

User:Dufresne tim/sandbox

I noticed that my very own, impartial and competent contribution is not published! Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dufresne tim (talk • contribs) 17:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Dufresne tim, it might have something to do with the fact that your draft has no independent reliable sources to verify any of the material in the draft. How can we check to make sure what you've said is true? As far as the reason for being declined - we don't need every minor detail about the festival, including things like The cost of costumes is on average 160 Euros. Trim out some of the excessive detail and make sure everything is written from a neutral point of view. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Thanks for the answer, but what I write is a neutral and independent search, I know the case well and I know that many details can only be verified by a legal inquiry, but the organizers are colluding with many politicians and officials. Much information is also due to my personal experience, such as Michel Moore, if you want to confirm my findings try searching on wiki or elsewhere and you will see that my words are well founded. I want to know this mafia phenomenon impartially! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dufresne tim (talk • contribs) 21:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Linus of Thrace

Hi Chrissymad, just wanted to make sure you took note of your mistaken speedy deletion nomination of Linus of Thrace, per my comment at User talk:Markx121993#Speedy deletion nomination of Linus of Thrace. Thanks, Paul August ☎ 14:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Paul August Whoops. Thought I had removed the warnings and left an apology but now I see I just EC'd. Thanks! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
No problem. Paul August ☎ 18:29, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Quint Buchholz & Draft:Sheafer Lab Theater

Hi, it looks like you've forgotten to remove the review template on these two drafts.Draft:Quint Buchholz & Draft:Sheafer Lab Theater. Plum3600 (talk) 10:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Plum3600 I'm aware. The Bucholz draft specifically is very long and takes a lot of verification. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Chrissymad Could you do me a favour and review my draft article, Draft:Faryal Makhdoom, if you have time? It would mean a lot. Plum3600 (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Peer effects

I would like to find out what do I have to do to get my paper accepted. I have mentioned a bunch of good references, and eliminated the thoughts which I provided to enhance understanding as the previous reviewer said that it was a personal voice. Now what? Please help me to understand what is the problem with my text and what is that I would have to change. Thanks a lot, cheers!--Zsomko (talk) 12:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

About the deletion added by me at Lookahead

I'm sorry to tell you but you deleted the correct info posted by me and left an incorrect one.

"In dynamic range compression, a signal processing design to avoid compromise between slow attack rates that produce smooth-sounding gain changes, and fast attack rates capable of catching transients"

Lookahead is delay on signal to can find the disturbing sound before playing. Have nothing to do with attack feature. Only to setting/presets, musicians correlate lookahead with attack and release but that's different...

[1]

References

  1. ^ easyLimiter based on Lookahead

Anyway there miss an important important aspect: lookahead on limiters for music production.

Mariusmta (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Mariusmta Please see MOS:DAB and WP:DDD for more details on why I removed it. Information should be concise and covered in other articles, with links to said articles. This was not the case with your edit to Lookahead. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Min-on submission

The previous editor, Dr. Strauss, said the text was okay—the advert tone eliminated. I will submit again with some changes, but all in all, I think we are good to go. There is no copyright issue. You are the first to suggest otherwise. Please give it another look.Stgrlee16 (talk) 21:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

12:12:10, 31 May 2017 review of submission by Grant Davidson



Hi Chrissymad, Thanks for taking the time to review my submission. My first, and I took quite some time to read earlier articles on leadership, to get a feel for the style required. I came across all sorts from 'staccato' bullet points to essay-like stories. So here below is an adapted piece, a bit more matter-of-fact, which I would like your comment on, and any pointers you can give me to improve the style further. Look forward to hearing . . .

Proposed content

Einstein once offered that creativity and innovation are needed to solve the complex problems of the world, and particularly these skills are considered the most crucial for 21st century leadership. Creative Leadership is a natural progression from transformational, authentic and servant leadership, incorporating not only moral values, but pushing beyond these into the realms of social impact, inter-enterprise collaboration, while actively safeguarding planet Earth and its resources. Although technology will continue to provide enablers for increasing our effectiveness, the focus of innovation is widening, necessarily, to create an inclusive distribution of wealth and welfare, and to the tighten the bond between natural and manmade ecosystems. In other words, the collective interests of societal impact need to be balanced with those of leading individuals.

Contents :

Introduction

Definition

  • Creative leadership as a philosophy
  • Creative leadership as an act

Theories past

  • Scientific Management
  • The Great Man theory
  • The Trait theory
  • Participative Leadership
  • Contingency Theory of Leadership
  • Charismatic Leadership
  • Situational Leadership
  • Servant Leadership
  • Entrepreneurial leadership

Supporting theories

  • Transformational Leadership
  • Authentic Leadership
  • Servant Leadership

Creative Leadership

  • Characteristics
  • Styles
  • Influencers
  • References

Introduction

In this interconnected, fast-paced and symbiotic world, we need leaders with novel, noble ideas, who are willing to take risks, inspire and do the hard work, while building on strategic partnerships to address societal and global challenges. In these endeavors, leaders must also incorporate skills from the realms of design, as well as the hard and soft sciences. To succeed, the new economy will need to substitute globalization with a systemic approach to local solutions which, in turn, contribute to solving large-scale global issues. These solutions can only be created with intimate, empathetic knowledge of the context, needs and culture. By nature no single stakeholder can create them.

Definition.

Creative leadership as a philosophy • embraces change as a given while seeking opportunity in all things by envisioning desirable futures. • unleashes the courage, collaboration and creativity of potential contributors, and applies this towards a generous, inclusive purpose • is rooted in pragmatic idealism, empathy and the rise of a transcendent consciousness that goes beyond gratifying the needs of the individual.

Creative leadership as an act • is the ability of an individual to envision desirable futures and build a scalable enterprise through derived innovative strategies. • is the combination of creativity, critical analysis, experimentation and bold action to drive participative value, which serves the triple bottom line (planet, people, profit).

12:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)12:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)12:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)~

Grant Davidson, I've read through both of your texts. Unfortunately neither of them is particularly suitable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a place for personal essays or original research. Now, the subject of your essays, "creative leadership", may be suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia, but it must be written in a neutral, well-sourced manner. Phrases like In this interconnected, fast-paced and symbiotic world, we need leaders with novel, noble ideas... are not encyclopaedic content. When you make a statement like New models of business are about vision, focus, communication, cognitive flexibility, authenticity, and partnership - who said that? Where can I go to verify that these are the new models?
So in summary, you're welcome to continue working on your page, but you'll need to add inline citations, and make sure everything is verifiable and neutral. Primefac (talk) 12:26, 31 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

05:02:11, 2 June 2017 review of submission by TynniMay


Hi Chrissymad, this is TyyniMay, I made several changes to the proposed article on Steven Lang, fixing up (I hope) the references. That was on May 6th but it's now June and I've not heard any more. Is there something more I need to be doing? Many thanks for your time, Tyyni TynniMay (talk) 05:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

TynniMay, the draft backlog is about a month at the moment, so your draft will probably be reviewed in the next week or two. Primefac (talk) 11:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Delta_Kappa_Phi

It does indeed appear that you deleted my new contribution by reversion. Or, is there an underlying automated reversion in play?

I would appreciate the help. I feel bullied by these total reversions. It is very discouraging when all of one's well intention completely factual contribution is completely disregarded. I would have expected that which is with merit be retained.

I am totally unaware of any copyright violation and would be delighted to know exactly what content represents such. I believe that nearly all of the information directly below is a public record, thus is subject to "Fair Use" or posted with permission by Delta Kappa Phi Fraternity of America, Inc.

Is the issue a missing attribution of a copyright release?

Delta Kappa Phi Fraternity of America

The new factual content added is:

Delta Kappa Phi Fraternity of America, Inc.(ΔΚΦ) Delta Kappa Phi Fraternity of America, Inc. [1] is a national fraternity organized in 1899 and incorporated in 1905. It is the oldest textile fraternity in America.

Chapter Details

The character of the fraternity has significantly differed from school to school. While many of its chapters have been social fraternities with some characteristics of a professional fraternity, the chapters at North Carolina State and Georgia Tech have been primarily oriented as professional fraternities.[2]

Alpha Chapter was founded at Philadelphia Textile School in Philadelphia, PA 1899. It was disbanded 1960s and counts 888 brothers in its membership.

Beta Chapter was founded at Lowell Textile School in Lowell, MA in 1902. It is still active and counts 1632 brothers in its membership.

Gamma Chapter was founded at Rhode Island School of Design in Providence, RI in 1917. It was disbanded.

Delta Chapter was founded at New Bedford Textile School in New Bedford, M in 1917. It was disbanded 1998 and counts 1018 brothers in its membership.

Kappa Chapter was founded at North Carolina State College in Raleigh, NC in 1948. It was disbanded 2012 and counts 930 brothers in its membership.

Theta Chapter was founded at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, GA in 1949. It was disbanded 1960s and counts 303 brothers in its membership. Chapter Related College/University Chronology

Alpha Chapter: Philadelphia University (1999-today); Philadelphia College of Textiles & Science (1961-1999); Philadelphia Textile Institute (1942-1961); Philadelphia Textile School (1894-1942).

Beta Chapter: University of Mass Massachusetts Lowell (1991-today); University of Lowell (1976-1991)[3]; Lowell Technological Institute (1953-1975); Lowell Textile Institute (1929-1953); Lowell Textile School (1895-1929).

Gamma Chapter: Rhode Island School of Design (1877-today).

Delta Chapter: University of Mass Massachusetts Dartmouth (1991-today); Southeastern Massachusetts University (1969-1991); Southeastern Massachusetts Technological Institute (1964-1969); New Bedford Institute of Textiles and Technology (1957-1964); New Bedford Textile Institute (1946-1957); New Bedford Textile School (1899-1946).

Kappa Chapter: North Carolina State University (1962-today); North Carolina State College (1956-1962); University of North Carolina (1931-1956); North Carolina State College of Agriculture and Engineering (1918-1931); North Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts (1887-1918).

Theta Chapter: Georgia Institute of Technology (1948-today); Georgia School of Technology (1885-1948).

Permission was obtained from the National Fraternity to post:

Delta Kappa Phi Fraternity of America, Inc. held its 55th National Convention at Beta Chapter, 9 Mount Hope Street, Lowell, Massachusetts on April 30, 2017.

ManagingDirector Who did they release the copyright to? If it was not directly to Wikipedia through WP:OTRS or clearly marked with a compatible license, it can't be used. Additionally, you really should be requesting edits given your conflict of interest. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Reply - June 2, 2017

The information was emailed to me by the National President with permission to post on Wiki and their web site which I provide in good faith to the fraternity without cost as a public service. I'm guessing that taking factual public record information from their web site and posting it to Wiki is the copyright issue. Would it be enough to post a "GNU" type license on their web site? All these people want is a correct, factual and complete account of their existence on Wiki. I've spent a whole day on this project with little to show for it. How can I move the ball forward? Thanks for your comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManagingDirector (talk • contribs) 16:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Actually, ManagingDirector, having them put up a "copyleft" notice on their website would work. It's not ideal for it to be GNU (Creative Commons is better), but more information about that can be found at WP:DONATETEXT. As a minor note, it is possible to have factual, correct information on Wikipedia without it being directly copied from another source. Primefac (talk) 16:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Rejected draft

To work on an article for a year, and try to shift through events just to have someone tell you that despite all that you've found on the subject they have a problem with how you've written it...I know you don't know how any of that feels. - Informant16 May 25, 2017

Informant16, many AFC reviewers are content creators themselves, and while we don't often spend a year writing an article, we've all experienced frustration when someone disagrees with the work we've done. As Chrissymad mentioned in her decline notice, much of the information on your draft is already included in John F. Kennedy, and some of other information such as Kennedy was involved in a student committee dedicated to the funding of Red Cross for refugees... is fairly trivial information. Just because your draft was declined doesn't mean you should just up and quit; our existing article on JFK could be improved to a Good Article with a little bit of work, so maybe you could devote the same energy you put into the draft into making the existing article better? Primefac (talk) 14:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
So because you disagree with one piece of information, as you pointed out in the draft, then you're going to throw the whole thing out. It's common place on here for you guys to go about picking some things out you don't like and saying they're bad, I get that, but she just denounced the entire thing. There are other early life articles shorter and longer than that one and it seems the only reason this one won't get accepted is because it is on JFK. - Informant16 May 25, 2017
Informant16 Nevermind my previous edit, I see your talk edits now. However, as I said previously, this was written like an essay. The tone is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. No one is saying delete it but in it's current state it will not be approved. You can continue working to fix it. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
You keep making the claim of written like an essay. I wrote that the same way I write any article so should I just manually delete every entry I've made on here? Whose to say if I make some changes, which you still won't specify, then you're going to have issue with it again? You're not saying, "Do this, this way" but rather "Just do this." You should know by your review that I'm clearly not educated enough of a writer to understand the difference. - Informant16 May 25, 2017
Informant16 Part of the purpose of AFC is so that you can go back and change stuff to make it suitable for an encyclopedia...one decline isn't a deletion. There are some great links in the decline notice which further explain about encyclopedic tone, I would start there. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
As a minor note, throwing your toys out of the pram (i.e. threatening to just up and delete everything you've done) is a bit excessive. Primefac (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
I'd used as the basis for the article existing ones such as the Early life of Frank Sinatra and Early life of Joseph Stalin. Primefac, I've written this the way I'd write any other article and a lot of the stuff I've written such as the presidential timelines and some of the content on the members of the Trump administration, has stayed up. So if my involvement is not good enough here then surely it wasn't in any of those places. I'm not threatening anything, as I know if I tried then I would get charged with vandalizing multiple pages and then banned for picking up my stuff and taking it with me. Informant16 May 25, 2017
(looking in): Informant16, this isn't personal. Each article is judged on its own merits. No person does equally good work all the time, here or any other context. All writers, even the most expert, benefit from revision. What you wrote is a good start, but it needs abridgment. The medical information is important, but all the details are not. You should work on this further. DGG ( talk ) 00:59, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

More FYI

Trout me if you already know about this, but checking accounts' filter logs is a sneaky way of viewing otherwise deleted pages. It's very helpful for SPI, and I've used it extensively. Best, GABgab 16:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

ASV

Hello. Why did you remove links on Adaptive Support Ventilation? Thank you. Dctrzl (talk) 17:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add my contribution back

Hi Chrissymad,

You removed my Spiceworks contribution to the Comparison of Q&A sites page. Spiceworks is more relevant than many of the sites listed. How can I get it added back?

Thanks! Marni — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marniburger (talk • contribs) 14:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Re: reverted changes to "Horiyoshi III" page

Hello Chrissymad

I've just seen you reverted the changes I did on Horiyoshi's article. The idea was not to advertise his job but to show people that he is still tattooing. The current article is completely misleading and let people who have always dreamed of making a tattoo with him to give up. He is still doing new tattoos and they are not as expensive as people think. That was the point I wanted to transmit with the edits to the article.


Fernando Granata (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Early Life of JFK

You asked me about this. I consider the concept is perfectly appropriate article. Nut you should make the following changes: slightly decrease the detail on family, schooling, and the medical detail. Trim out unnecessary references that may be from unauthoritativer sources. Retitle it Early life and career of ....and resubmit. Let me know on my talk p. when you do. DGG ( talk ) 09:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

DGG I think you may have the wrong editor. :) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:26, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

09:56:07, 8 June 2017 review of submission by GTECat


Hi Chrissymad,

I was hoping you might be able to suggest how to better reference this article such that it gets approved?

The reference used has come directly from the Association that has created the articles namesake and is the most accurate, up to date, and reliable information available. Any other source used to further verify the content of this article would reference back to the named association, and most likely the reference currently included.

Kind regards,

GTECat GTECat (talk) 09:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello!

Hello Chrissymad! I'm so sorry but I accidentally deleted the speedy deletion notices last time when i was editing. So sorry:( I Will fix the page soon! Kent961 (talk) 20:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

09:36:51, 9 June 2017 review of submission by Quibu


Hello Chrissymad, I really don't understand why you have rejected my article again. This is the fifth time I have (meticulously) revised it according to the criticism given by the reviewer and every time there seems to be a different reason for rejection. As you said yourself, I included a lot of references that not only prove Quint Buchholz is a notable person but also EACH and EVERY statement made in the article. Among the sources are articles from various independent newspapers, among them the renowned German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung AND the NY Times, which published an article about Quint Buchholz and only about Quint Buchholz, written by renowned children's literature expert Perry Nodelman. Also, among the sources listed are two different encyclopedias that have an entry under his name, as well as two other published books about contemporary art that dedicate whole chapters to Quint Buchholz. How does that constitute being mentioned only "in passing"? Furthermore, he is a recipient of many offical international prizes and awards, including the Mildred L. Batchelder Award. The list of recipients of the Batchelder Award is even available on the English Wikipedia itself, and Quint Buchholz appears there! How can a person who has illustrated over 70 different works of world literature and published a number of books himself still not be an item on the English Wikipedia? (an article about him is, however, available on the German Wikipedia.) I would like to kindly ask you to reconsider your rejection or tell me exactly what I need to do so I don't have to keep putting time into this article just so it is rejected again. Sincerely, Quibu (talk) 09:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Bass music#Merge of Bass music and Future bass

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bass music#Merge of Bass music and Future bass. - TheMagnificentist 17:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae/Archive_4&oldid=1143893591"