Jump to content

User talk:Chaud321

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chaud321 (talk | contribs) at 14:28, 17 May 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles:

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:08, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z15

I see your paid editing declaration, so I have made this only a username block. However, I would note that your use of the terms "personal pages" and "company pages" is incorrect; Wikipedia has articles about companies and people, they do not belong to the subjects, who have no more rights to them than any other editor. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to not edit articles directly. If memory serves, you need to list all those who have paid you to edit. You will need to suggest edits. All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking.-- Dlohcierekim 14:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Chaud321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Thanks for the advice! I was unaware of that policy about appearing to represent a group or organization or website. Here is a new username to switch out. Can we associate it with my past contributions? Thanks! (Note: See my paid disclosure and conflict of interest statements.) 76.27.177.119 (talk) 13:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Accept. Unblocked. Welcome back, Yes -- Dlohcierekim 14:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed HTM Editor to Chaud321

globally renamed HTM Editor to Chaud321-- Dlohcierekim 14:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlohcierekim: Thanks very much! Chaud321 (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Booster Fuels 29-AUG-2019

As the review editor for this last series of requests, I'd like to offer my input to your request for editor assistance. In your recent request you had asked for news items concerning the company's funding rounds to be added in detail to the article. While the broad strokes have been included, other details were not. The sources offered have been news coverage of the company. While news coverage can be a useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy details do not qualify for inclusion. Routine news reporting of announcement details on funding rounds may seem important to the company, but for others they may be seen as insufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

In this case, Booster views each successful funding round as validation of the company and its officers – a validation which represents the startup's quest to bring a viable, successful product to their respective marketplace. Booster views these as representational of its core value and thus should be mentioned in their article. However, Wikipedia is not the place to promote a company's validation.

It's important to remember that even when a company is notable, not all events they are involved in are. News reporting about a company's achieved funding rounds can be flattering and provide needed validation, but using all of these sources with every fleshed-out nuance would lead to over-detailed articles that look like a diary. Not every source of income is significant enough to be included in a company's article.

In the case of Booster, the main funding achivements have been graphed in the article, while the SEC report used as the source is linked in the reference for the reader to investigate further where each amount came from. Being only 4 years-old, it's important for the company to remember that as they grow, more information will inevitably make it to the article. I look forward to your continued helpful suggestions, and I appreciate all of your assistance in helping to improve this important article. Regards,  Spintendo  11:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Lucid, from its old location at User:Chaud321/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 22:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucid (company) (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sagotreespirit were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Avoid using PR language (especially in the Awards and Recognition section): WP:IBA. Avoid using direct quotes due to the risk of running into copyright violations. Company may be too new to meet notability requirements: WP:NCORP.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Sagotreespirit (talk) 16:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lucid (company) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lucid (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucid (company)

Hello, Chaud321. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 14:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AiFi (company) has been accepted

AiFi (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liancetalk/contribs 00:31, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Winnett (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE and WP:BIO.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Clarityfiend (talk) 22:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Chaud321! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clarityfiend (talk) 22:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 11-NOV-2020

@Clarityfiend: Thank you for the guidance and review! I have beefed up the article Draft:Caroline_Winnett and resubmitted with two new sections and more citations/references to the subject from local and international sources. Her role as the director of a global accelerator is similar to Sam Altman head of Y Combinator.

Chaud321 (talk) 22:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Winnett has been accepted

Caroline Winnett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 00:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 21-NOV-2020

@Cairo2k18: I'm honored! Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Gu has been accepted

Steve Gu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Destroyer🌀🌀 14:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 8-DEC-2020

@Destroyeraa: Thank you so much!
No problem. The draft was very well-written! ~ Destroyer🌀🌀 14:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for disclosing your paid editing status. As per WP:Paid, please provide links on your Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where you advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. Thank you, GSS 💬 17:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GSS Yes! Please note that on my user page User:Chaud321 I list my employer as https://hottomato.net/, whose clients I assist. I do not advertise anywhere however, and my employer also does not advertise my Wikipedia services anywhere, as Wikipedia is not a primary business offering, so I have nothing additional to disclose at this time. Thanks for checking though!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solar Impulse Foundation

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sadads (talk) 13:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 9-MAR-2020

@Sadads: Thank you so much!

Chaud321 (talk) 14:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chaud321&oldid=1023641542"