User talk:RichardColgate

Talk sub pages

Jersey Politics

Priority List

1. Complete List_of_politicians_in_Jersey for other ten parishes.
2. Expand section on parochial activity
3. Complete entries for all current Jersey Ministers and other major political figures
4. Complete election information for List of elections in Jersey

Election Results

I don't believe that factual lists are copyrightable, and given that the election results are by their very nature information in the public domain, I'd say you would be safe in reproducing the results from that source. Man vyi 17:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Here

Cat:s

Your cat:ting has been overall helpful, thank you. But could you look at the conventions in supercat:s before proposing changes, please. Then, if you want to propose a change away from convention, at least argue away for it on the basis of what exists! Happy cat:ting! Man vyi 07:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cats - VCs

I like the look of the new People from Jersey categories. You may like to consider how best to integrate the List of Channel Islands Victoria Cross recipients into Category:Victoria Cross recipients from Jersey. footie 17:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All recipients have now been moved to the new category. RichardColgate 16:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Pallett

Yes, that looks fair and accurate to me. Nice one.Daverotherham 20:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey Democratic Alliance

Well done again. Your latest changes make the article far more useful to a lay reader wishing to find out about the party, which should be our prime objective as Wikipedians.Daverotherham 03:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Centre party logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Centre party logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jdalogo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Jdalogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Pallett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Pallett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Pallett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Teapotgeorge^Talk 16:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I have reverted your request for deletion of Jersey Conservative Party as other users have made contributions it cannot be deleted per criterion G7 (See the section on Non-criteria. If you still think the article should be deleted, please take it to Articles for deletion. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 02:51, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey elections

I'll keep an eye on the page and contribute where possible. I'll also aim to get some illustrative media during the campaigns (this time not subject to deletion, like the last lot...) Man vyi (talk) 08:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Hill (Jersey politician)

Please contribute to the debate on proposed deletion for non-notability of the new article on ex-Deputy Bob Hill Bob Hill (Jersey politician) Andrew Le Sueur (talk)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello RichardColgate! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Beeches Old Boys

Category:Beeches Old Boys, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:16, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Channel Islands. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to articles related to the Channel Islands. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Project Page. Thank You!

Mat ty.007 08:12, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi RichardColgate,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of Philip Ozouf

The article Philip Ozouf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is only one article about a Philip Ozouf. I propose that this disambiguation page is deleted in preparation of a move of Philip Ozouf Jr to Philip Ozouf.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]