User talk:Luna Santin

Talk – Sandbox – Blog

Welcome to my talk page! I'll sometimes reply on your talk, but will frequently (increasingly often) reply here.

When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps:

• Use a ==descriptive heading==

• Use [[wikilinks]] when mentioning users and pages

• Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date

If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia or frequently asked questions.

Click here to leave me a message

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.

Note: If you leave me a message and don't get a reply, it's probably because (a) I'm working on it, or (b) I honestly missed your message, which unfortunately happens fairly often when this page gets busy. Don't be shy about reminding me here or via email, if it's been awhile with no reply.

Luna Santin 06:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Magic Kirin/Reapor sockpuppet

New user account User:Reapor2 appears to be a sockpuppet; checkuser unnecessary (see Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Decato). JRSP 00:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this new user's contributions[1], I think it may be a new sock JRSP 21:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Self-block request

Hi Luna, thank you in advance.

As per my request in the closed IRC channel #wikimedia-admin, I hereby request a 24 hour block to cool down from the WP:VPP#Summary of F.A.C section above uproar.

--Connel MacKenzie - wikt 03:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i just signed up for wikipedia today because i wanted to edit an article about the crime in el salvador which contained incorrect and out-dated information. i then recieved something saying i cannot edit it and now i'm blocked from editing anything. block me all you want but you need to be more careful on the things that are being put into these articles, make sure they are actual facts and not a bunch of false statements being written by 12 year olds and racists. I will not have my country insulted on wikipedia!!!

Matteo747 05:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

jj0909jj

You recently reverted this edit by User:Jj0909jj. This user has been doing practically nothing on Wikipedia except for making edits like that ([2], [3], [4], [5]) and adding lots of really bizzare stuff ([6]). Tens of edits by them have been reverted. Paul Cyr has already provided a final warning on their talk page; it might be time for a block... -/- Warren 06:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After further review I decided to send it off to AIV, and now they're blocked. Onwards. :) -/- Warren 06:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Valentines Day!

I wish you and your family have a wonderful Valentines Day!

Kamope · talk · contributions 12:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hate To Sound Bossy...

I hate to sound bossy, but did you get my E-mail? (Sorry, I really don't mean to sound bossy!) Acalamari 21:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I can wait, but the E-mail's subject requires that I don't post anything to the noticeboard. It concerns a "favorite" user of ours, and a more important situation. Sadly, I have to keep the topic off the talk pages for the moment. Acalamari 21:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for unblocking me.

Beelzebarn 21:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Could I just ask you a question? Why is the sea bird article so long, and why did you revert my edits?--63.138.11.3 23:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want an answer, NOW! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.138.11.3 (talk) 2 February 2007

RE:SEGA

User_talk:Luna_Santin/Archive_18#SEGA; I had to open a new case. Just letting you know. Cheers! -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 15:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Help

Here, Wikipedia:Help desk#Time Userbox. Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 3:01pm, February 3, 2007

* Luna-San asks for the severed head of Wikipe-tan

You asked, I deliver. Note that, in addition to bleeding from her mouth, she's also bleeding just a bit from the corner of her eye?

DS 00:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your unblock help

You left notes on my talk page indicating that you helped negotiate a partial unblock of my IP address. Thanks!

There are still two things I am confused about, and I would be grateful if you can help clear things up for me:

how can I see a query that shows that I am blocked? I tried a lot of different ways, but never saw my IP address. Neither this autoblock query [7] nor Special:Ipblocklist seemed to include me.
how can I find out why I was blocked? I saw the text "CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address is being used abusively" but I can't imagine that anyone at this IP would have done anything like that. As the responsible party behind that IP, I'd like to know if I'm wrong!

Thanks greatly,

JBazuzi 02:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for clarifying that :-) 203.211.116.57 09:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blockage Request

G'day. Could you please block User_talk:216.108.4.72, whose edit to featured article of the day you just reverted? He's done a whole bunch of vandalism and gotten away with only warnings over the past two months Leon 09:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) Leon 09:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

I'm beginner .Can you teach me to create a big one article ?

HI HI i'm so happy you answer me

Hi my name is tong im in thailand .Do you know that ? in south east asia . Hey where are you please tell me . what do you think about wikipedia ? how old are you ? im 20 please talk to me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Encyclopedia a-z (talk • contribs) 11:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Population genetics of the british isles

Theres nothing wrong with this article, please if you can find some sources that oppose common veiws add them to the article, if you cant then stop whinging.

I cant understand why you would want to delete this article. please, you seem to be a celtic enthusiast so if you can find reliable sources supporting your celtic enthusiasm please add them , else dont add them. this article is about the genetics of the british isles anyway, you linguistic source is of total irrelevance and nless you can cite a reliable source tieing together genetic evidence with celtic invasion claims then there is no reason to add any of your celtic claims to the article as they would be purely your own opinion.

You can add as many genetic sources as you want, but you can only add historical/linguistic sources if they are tied into a source that includes genetic information. )

You cannot delete all the genetic data about irish people just becuase you think that some subclade of r1b found in la tene region is similar to a subclade found in ireland. That should be startlingly obvious to someone as intelligent as you, hence I therefore deem you as biased and with a certain political agenda.

--Globe01 13:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ostrich burgers

Er, why did you remove my article? Sure it needs a bit of expanding and cleaning up- but it was never going to be perfect right from the start. You see, that kind of attitude is precisely what we don't need round here, I mean what exactly did you think you were playing at son?--Pope Ostrich Burger 14:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for lifting the autoblock! Kamope · talk · contributions 22:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

about the el salvador page

i wanted to know what happened to the tourism section of wikipedia that took me 3 hours to create? i have no idea of why you or anybody would take it off... i do know there is people vandilising but i thought you said you have specific people watching out for vandalism... everything that i wrote is true and if you need proof i will send you the articles but im just mad because the whole el salvador article is WRONG! and im trying to help and contribute the truth because i am from that country so i know and it seems like i try to add things but they get taken off... honestly if you dont appreciate the truth then there shouldnt be no country info because whats the point on displaying incorrect information?!... i dont find a point to it so please let me know if your the only person incharge because i would seriously like to talk to somebody about this because i really dont get it and i want truth in this page not stuff from the 1980's so please write back and tell me who else i can speak with. thanks Matteo747 02:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]