Template:Did you know nominations/Sarkis Lole

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:32, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Sarkis Lole

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Old post office of Mardin

• ... that Sarkis Lole, the Armenian chief architect of Mardin who constructed much of the early modern architecture of the city, never received any formal training and designed his buildings in the sand? Source: [1] Wharton 2016, 127: “Concerning the legacy of the mimarbaşı of Mardin, Serkis Elyas Lole, it is clear from the memories of his living relatives, and of descendants of those who worked as part of his team that Lole was responsible for much of the architecture in the city. They attribute the majority of Mardin’s nineteenth-century mansions (konaks), churches, institutions, and even mosque repairs to Lole” and “Serkis is not known to have trained professionally and designed buildings by drawing in the sand”
  • ALT1: ... that Ottoman Armenian architect Sarkis Lole was the chief architect of Mardin who constructed much of the early modern architecture of the city, such as the old post office (pictured)? Source: "The building, which was made built by Satana family to Armenian architect Lole in 1890 and is one of the finest examples of Mardin civil architecture" [2]; “Lole’s work include residential architecture such as the Șahtana house ... ”Wharton 2015, 95[3]

Created by TagaworShah (talk). Self-nominated at 05:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: I would prefer the second hook because it ties nicely with the image (which is really pretty). VR _talk 14:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@Vice regent: Thank you for your review! I agree that his architectural works are really pretty and the second hook complements that best. Have a great day! TagaworShah (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• @TagaworShah: could the hooks please be cited inline in the article? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 07:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron: Hello! Sorry for responding so late. As far as I can see both of the hooks are cited inline in the article. The first one is cited in the body and the second one is cited in the lede and in the image caption. Please let me know if i’m missing something. Cheers. TagaworShah (talk) 07:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

• @TagaworShah: the hook fact has to be cited right at the end of the sentence; normally, I'd do that myself, but since it's a book that I can't access, it falls on you to use the proper citation there. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 10:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron: Sorry for the confusion, i’m unfamiliar with the DYK process. I’ve now added a full citation at the end of the hook. TagaworShah (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

• In the article, TagaworShah, in the article :) right at the end of the sentence. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 17:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron: I moved the citations in the article to the end of each claim. Cheers. TagaworShah (talk) 18:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

References

ALT0 to T:DYK/P6 without image