Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All bar one of the edits to this article since mid-December have been by sock accounts of prolific sockpuppet User:Politialguru. This seems to be one the favourite articles for his/her trademark wikifiddling. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Question: 10mmsocket, can you point to a recent disruptive edit by a confirmed user that would justify going straight to WP:ECP from none without trying WP:SEMI first? And can explain the connection of that blocked user to any one account in that page? That is not immediately evident, either. El_C 11:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: User continuously undoes changes we've made Lumberdev (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Who are "we"?--Ymblanter (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This appears to be a long-running occasional dispute over minor style issues, such as what order to list the principal people or how much prominence to give them. Take it to the talk page, please. MelanieN (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: there is an edit that does not include the source or reference Ms.semut (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Declined Please explain what edits should occur and why they are correct. That should occur at the article talk page (Talk:Persaudaraan Setia Hati Terate). Johnuniq (talk) 06:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Sorry, Johnuniq, 
Already done. This article is such a mess, and has been so since its inception, so I'm wary of putting a clock on the protection. Maybe later on we can downgrade. El_C 06:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- ECP looks good. As I posted on article talk, I asked for help at the wikiproject. Johnuniq (talk) 07:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Infinite protection from trolls, false information, and defamation of a living person. KatyKate81452 (talk) 20:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Temporary extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. The Arbitration Committee says that articles with Jewish history get Extended protection. Yodas henchman (talk) 21:17, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Declined. The Arbitration Committee does not say that. El_C 06:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent IP edit warring. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 01:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 06:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AK965 (talk) 01:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 06:42, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs persistently classifying this as an "epic" film without providing sourcing. DonIago (talk) 03:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Revdels. DonIago, who cares about that isolated issue. There's so much disruption (some of which is extremely offensive). El_C 06:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. HurricaneEdgar 03:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. HurricaneEdgar, I'm sure that IP will get right on getting a source for 2027 once their block expires! ☻ El_C 06:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing nationalist edit warring. No one questions that this dish was invented in Ohio, yet for some reason the lineage of the person or persons who invented it is worth edit warring over again and again. I tried a brief full protection but that didn't stop it, would a prefer a totally uninvolved admin decide what to do next. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Do you believe that user who involved in edit warring are mainly single IP (2601:246:5581:8d00:7164:5410:e68:7fc7)? 36.77.64.79 (talk) 05:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beeblebrox, RE: WP:ECP — everyone except the IP seem to already be extended confirmed, so trying out a 2nd but longer full protection (and if that doesn't work, probably blocks). El_C 06:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Indefinitely semi protection: Persistent --- Vandalism (Check here [1]) (63.143.196.64 (talk) 03:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC))
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. significant volume of anonymous IP edits specifically reverting / editing good faith additions that reflect users legal issues. BonaFide88 (talk) 04:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: keep rolling back without discussion. Kititto (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. OP blocked. El_C 06:15, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by non-confirmed users / drive-by IP's. BonaFide88 (talk) 07:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)