Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smith, Gambrell & Russell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Smith, Gambrell & Russell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline G11 eligible article that has been created multiple times on a law firm organization that fails to meet WP:NORG, invariably WP:ORGDEPTH isn’t met. A before search showed me hits in primary sources, directories and other user generated sources. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nominator. Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 22:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete , but one of the partners, E. Smythe Gambrell, is notable as having been president. of the American Bar Association, the highest national level professional society. DGG ( talk ) 01:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable organization that fails to satisfy NCORP, due to lack in-depth significant coverage in RS. Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I couldn't find sufficient sources to show notability. Suonii180 (talk) 13:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:NCORP bop34 • talk • contribs 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.