Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BonaFide88 (talk | contribs) at 06:09, 27 January 2022 (Requesting protection for Emma Sinclair). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Reason: Vandalism, add fake informations.

Semi-protection request. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 16:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: partially done EvergreenFir (talk) 16:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – currently a WP:AN discussion on this, but best course of action will be to help end the dispute through protection, and through the discussion. 🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox 21:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruption since jan 1. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 23:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am a researcher, and I amended the page to include references. Previously, the page included no references whatsoever. However, people still keep deleting all references, resulting in a historically incorrect page. I have kindly asked people not to erase this unless they have references for their facts so that the information in the article (which is normally only accessible via archives) can be accessed by all. Legallyanon (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The houseofnames source you've re-added is questionable; also, it doesn't need to be repeated as you've done. Otherwise, there's not enough disruption to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA vandalism; see User:EvergreenFir/socks#31_Minutos_(Sao_Paulo,_Brazil). wizzito | say hello! 00:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Slow edit war over the subject's pronouns by several IPs/new user. Isabelle 🔔 01:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: High levels of disruptive editing by new account and IP in the past 24 hours or so. [1], [2], [3] Aleena98 (talk) 02:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Somewhat highly visible page
Suggestion: Permanent semi-protection The Page Maker 2.1 (talk) 04:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps adding derogatory images. Kpddg (talk) 04:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing to remove a negative statement on a living person, two prior protections have not worked Keeley_Dann account created to bypass semi-protection, deleted page protection & removed negative statement. Requesting Extended Confirmed Protection. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emma_Sinclair&diff=1067913330&oldid=1067912771 BonaFide88 (talk) 06:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]