Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MissaSinfonia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 06:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MissaSinfonia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Popular Mexican YouTuber who produces gaming and comedy videos. I'm not seeing sufficient in-depth coverage of him in a quick web search (WP:BEFORE), specifically in Spanish-language media. I only found some articles from La Neta ([1][2]), which does not look like a reliable source, and a 2018 entry from La Voz de Michoacán. Aranya (talk) 03:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 03:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 03:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 03:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete I was surprised this wasn't outright speediyl deleted. There is no coverage of this YTer, the fact that they have 12 million views/followers is entirely irrelevant as anyone can buy views/followers and there is exactly 0 other coverage. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just noticed that at various points in the article, MissaSinfonia is referred to as "he", "she" and "they" and this demonstrates to me, not an ambiguity about gender identity but a lack of care in writing the article. It is yet another article that was moved to Draft space in the middle of a AFD discussion that I moved back to main space. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 16:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete also looks eligible for G5. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The number of subscribers is never a factor in determining notability. If he is notable, he will be covered by the news. SunDawn talk 02:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability beyond having millions of subscribers. Neo-corelight (Talk) 12:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability not proven and it fits the pattern of other non-notable / even hoax articles edited by sockpuppet accounts of User:Peluches extronidos --10mmsocket (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sources found to bolster notability. Plus an extra serving of trout to the IP sock of the article creator who came to my talk page and claimed that the sourcing of the article was on par with any on Wikipedia (shortly before getting blocked for a level of disruption on the article which was block-worthy regardless of their level of sockitude). --Finngall ^talk 04:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.