Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalilah Enríquez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:29, 31 January 2022 (Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 04:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kalilah Enríquez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find anything to demonstrate notably for this person: in addition, a significant amount of detail was added by an editor whose username is suspiciously close to that of the subject, so there's a possible CoI to throw into the debate. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 16:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belize-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Plenty of coverage. Couple of recent news items show she is well known as a journalist, and the national library included her in a list of just 28 "Belizean women authors" (the link was dead but I found an archived copy). The article needs more cleanup - too many inline external links, most of which could probably be reformatted as references. PamD 17:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The evidence advances notability beyond any minimum criteria. The listing in a national library gives further evidence that more sources can likely be found and maybe someone will take interest in this area. Otr500 (talk) 12:45, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.