Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Elena Ibañez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 22:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Elena Ibañez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

originally written as a paid promotional article with very borderline notability ; the subsequent legal involvement does not make her more notable. (I do admit to a certain grim satisfaction to how the promotionalism turned out,but it's still unfair to have the article) DGG ( talk ) 02:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. I don't think her legal problems pass WP:CRIME.--Rusf10 (talk) 04:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on balance. I agree it's borderline and the COI notice should remain in place regardless. Deb (talk) 08:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete WIkipedia is not a place for self-promotion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 10:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- promo 'cruft on a non notable person. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:53, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.