Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MechScape (2nd nomination)
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:55, 1 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to User:Jeremjay24/MechScape. Userfied fot the time being. Could be later used in another article, as the debate shows. Tone 21:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed to delete after a request from Jeremjay24. --Tone 07:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- MechScape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I created this page around 2 months ago, way before Jagex cancelled MechScape. I would understand a few keeps, because Mark Gerhard (Jagex CEO) announced that "much of the game - including its engine - will be reused in the new secret project the Jagex development team is now working on." However, when we figure out the 'secret project', we could merge this article to that. Jeremjay24 20:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: Per nom. Quiet-As-An-Ice-Cube (talk) 22:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I don't think this can be speedied - G7 doesn't apply since people other than the creator have edited. It could be moved back to Jeremjay's userspace, though (which I think is where it came from?) 1ForTheMoney (talk) 22:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Correct. Jeremjay24 22:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Update If the nomination ends moving to User:Jeremjay24/MechScape, it's perfectly fine. Jeremjay24 01:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I don't think this can be speedied - G7 doesn't apply since people other than the creator have edited. It could be moved back to Jeremjay's userspace, though (which I think is where it came from?) 1ForTheMoney (talk) 22:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Now that the project is defunct there is no need for this page to remain here. The most appropriate solution would be to remove this page for the time being and, in the event that Jagex does release public statements about an upcoming game OR actually releases a game, the page can be recreated under the appropriate name. 115.70.62.49 (talk) 15:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- While it is true that this falls under WP:NOTNEWS and it looks a bit WP:CRYSTALly in tone right now, there are multiple reliable sources. It's not like we don't have other articles on cancelled games. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.