Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donetsk City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Donetsk City

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Donetsk Citi is a shopping centre in Artema Street in Donetsk. I used to do my shopping there when I had an apartment in Donetsk. It is very nice (but too expensive to buy china from), and totally non-notable. Toddy1 (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have done this as a discussion, in part, because it gives a reasonable amount of time for interested users to try to prove notability. By the way, I think its name in Latin script is Donetsk Citi, not Donetsk City.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve. Well, I just started this as a stub a few hours ago. Its a major shopping center, which appears to be the subject of regular coverage, though my ability to translate Russian sources using Google (and being careful) is limited. E.g., I saw a claim that Forbes.ua rated it the 5th busiest shopping center in Ukraine, but I have not added it yet without finding the best possible sourcing. Although Wikipedia:Notability (shopping centers) never passed, the size of this center exceeds that proposed guideline of 74,000 sq. m. As for the name, the official site's url is "doncity.com.ua" so I went with City instead of Citi. You can see on the website they have some type of stylized spelling that uses both latin and Cyrillic letters, is that a common thing? Its kind of neat.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 19:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Milowent. I don't think we should delete it, if it's properly sourced and written, it should stay. DDima 16:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Non-promotional and notable. OccultZone (Talk) 15:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.