Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strifer
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:02, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 09:02, 6 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strifer[edit]
- Strifer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsigned band, was eliminated on first day of a reality show. No sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 14:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No claim of notability that passes WP:MUSIC so clear deletion candidate. Theseeker4 (talk) 14:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notability established the usual way. MUSIC supplements N, not superseeds it. Not an exceptional case that requires overruling usual practice. WilyD 17:50, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Where are the sources then if they meet WP:N? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-
- That's just one source. Do you really think one source is enough when no more seem to exist? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see substantial coverage from reliable sources. I see 1 decent article, 1 press release, and 1 mention. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:NOTE. Even with this second article from The Union, I don't see it. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 19:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article cited by Wily establishes that the band was going to compete in a reality tv show, not that the band is notable. And as for the other "sources" offered, no comment.ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet notability for music--Omarcheeseboro (talk) 20:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added more sources just now: There are actually four articles in The Union that either are entirely about the band (3) or have a brief mention of them (1). Of course, WP:N notability would be more strongly established with a range of news sources, rather than just this one local paper. But WP:N allows the use of local sources because Wikipedia is both a general and a specialized encyclopedia. The coverage is not widespread in this case, but I would say it's a weak keep. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.