Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perla Lichi
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted. !Votes by editors unlikely to be familiar with criteria for inclusion are discounted. bd2412 T 20:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Perla Lichi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spam, previously created by Perla Lichi & Perla Lichi Design under this title & Perla lichi. This time she's paid User:WGWP to act as a WP:MEATPUPPET. Spam of a designer who lacks notability as a person, and fails WP:NCORP as a business. Cabayi (talk) 12:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Trivial, promo piece, which fails GNG. Not notable for stand alone article. WP:NOTNEWS, applies. Kierzek (talk) 12:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- I'm really curious to learn what part of NOTNEWS you think applies to this. Please, enlighten! 192.160.216.52 (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Reading your talk page, you know how things work around here and are not just "curious"; I suggest you clink on the link if need be and read for yourself. Kierzek (talk) 14:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Perhaps not surprisingly, I did do that. What about it applies? This lady has been written about in RS for all kinds of reasons for over a decade just per Lexis/Nexis. What about NOTNEWS applies here? 192.160.216.52 (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- It speaks for itself. Kierzek (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- Perhaps not surprisingly, I did do that. What about it applies? This lady has been written about in RS for all kinds of reasons for over a decade just per Lexis/Nexis. What about NOTNEWS applies here? 192.160.216.52 (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Reading your talk page, you know how things work around here and are not just "curious"; I suggest you clink on the link if need be and read for yourself. Kierzek (talk) 14:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- I'm really curious to learn what part of NOTNEWS you think applies to this. Please, enlighten! 192.160.216.52 (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- Despite nom's unsupported claims about GNG, it's clear that this subject meets it. Just for instance, look at:
- Perla Lichi Design Opens New Office in Mumbai, India - India Retail News October 15, 2013
- International designer emphasizes classic lines - Times Colonist (Victoria, British Columbia) September 7, 2013
- WHERE THE PROS LIVE - Palm Beach Post (Florida) June 16, 2007
- Be It Ever So Humble, Really - The New York Times February 2, 2012
- The last item is a review of a picture book of her designs, and it's in the NYT. As I said, a clear-cut pass of GNG. The nom seems more concerned with the tone of the article which, of course, is a matter for ordinary editing, not for deletion. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 13:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep -- Based on references given I find her to be a notable businesswoman in the interior arts world. She seems to be an author of multiple books, as well as having numerous references on her page that lead back to reputable sources in magazines and newspapers (some mentioned above). GNG is clearly there, and doesn't call for deletion. — ShawSt66 (talk • 18:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 04:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 04:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, salt it, I've googled and searched news and concur with the nom, keep votes are an IP editor and irregular user. Szzuk (talk) 08:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.