Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Liberalist Party
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:13, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:13, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 22:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Social Liberalist Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable political party. It's registered with the Electoral Commission, but that only means they've sent the Electoral Commission some cash. I can't find any evidence that they've ever contested anything or made enough of a splash to get mentioned in even the most local of newspapers. WP:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 15:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A political party normally will not be considered notable until they have received some coverage in independent reliable sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:ORG. A Google News Archive search returns two results; one is written by this political party, while the other is a passing mention. Cunard (talk) 18:57, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 19:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Until they get more attention than a blog on the Telegraph platform[1] and stop just being a "Facebook party" then they won't be notable enough for a Wikipedia entry. My frank view - a non-party founded bunch of teenagers that will fold within a couple of years. Fences&Windows 16:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.