Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Olmstead (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 07:16, 12 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 07:16, 12 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kevin Olmstead[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Kevin Olmstead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Textbook WP:BLP1E. Not really notable outside a big win. All news articles come from the time of his win, and an appearance on the 1 vs. 100 mob afterward isn't really a secondary assertation of notability. Last AFD was kept due to a crapflood of WP:ITSNOTABLEs, without any policy-based discussion of any sort. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:59, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Red Baboon (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BLP1E. Subsequent passing mentions in reliable sources refer to his big game show win. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:03, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per WP:BARE as a record holder that is significant. Whether the coverage is significant is an open question]]. Bearian (talk) 19:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:00, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No substantial coverage of the individual outside of this one event. No prejudice to recreation if he is covered in future sources. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.