Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick James Westlake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick James Westlake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP on a footballer who has never played in a fully-professional league, and thus fails WP:NFOOTY. Prod removed by article creator, who judging by his username, may also be the subject (he has also made his user page and talk page into the same article). Number 5 7 16:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 16:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 17:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have U5'd the user and talk pages as WP:NOTWEBHOST, we're not here for people to use user space to create articles on their non-notable selves, especially talk pages. Fenix down (talk) 17:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NFOOTBALL. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.