Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 16
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:55, 24 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
April 16[edit]
File:Tilingo By Vicente Padilla.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot from a TV show with no fair-use rationale (and the resolution might be too high for a rationale). Uploader lists themself as the author. ALH (talk) 03:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Speedily delete This photo is actually an unambiguous copyright violation (3rd row, 2nd column). ALH (talk) 04:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I dont understand, I own all the rights of the 70 shows. what do you need from me? you can visit my site @ www.elshowdelucky.com.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Erick Millan Original Cast El Show de Lucky.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot from a TV show with no fair-use rationale (and the resolution might be too high for a rationale). Uploader lists themself as the author. ALH (talk) 03:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Speedily delete I guess I should have checked google images first. This one's an unambiguous copyright violation: (Bottom row, left column). ALH (talk) 04:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I dont understand, I own all the rights of the 70 shows. what do you need from me? you can visit my site @ www.elshowdelucky.com.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Monique Abbadie Original Cast El Show de Lucky.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot from a TV show with no fair-use rationale (and the resolution might be too high for a rationale). Uploader lists themself as the author. ALH (talk) 03:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Speedily delete Again, my fault for not checking. This photo is an unambiguous copyright violation: 2nd row, left column. ALH (talk) 04:42, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I dont understand, I own all the rights of the 70 shows. what do you need from me? you can visit my site @ www.elshowdelucky.com.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Lucky en el publico.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lucky en el publico.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Screenshot from a TV show with no fair-use rationale (and the resolution might be too high for a rationale). Uploader lists themself as the author. ALH (talk) 03:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional info: The article about the show has been deleted, so a fair-use rationale is no longer possible. ALH (talk) 18:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I dont understand, I own all the rights of the 70 shows. what do you need from me? you can visit my site @ www.elshowdelucky.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elshowdelucky (talk • contribs) 03:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sheffield Hallam University Coat of Arms.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Heraldic crest of identifiable organisation, I fail to see how this is a self, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:01, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:HMG IS2 Full Accreditation Statement.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possibly unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a WP:Non-free content review listing). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: File was not marked as available under a free license or public domain. --Elvey (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Posted on behalf of Recipero Ltd:
This statement in the rationale "The purpose of the document is to provide official, PUBLIC notice of the Accreditation." is incorrect. This image was taken from the website of Recipero Ltd. They posted it their in the mistaken belief that its purpose was indeed to act as a publicly shareable statement of the accreditation status. However, on April 15th 2013 the issuer of the certificate made it clear to Recipero that this was intended to be a confidential document and as such should be removed from the public domain. Recipero have immediately removed the original image from their website and I now request that it is removed from Wikipedia. (see file talk page) Alexf(talk) 13:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What AnomieBOT just said. This file has NOT BEEN "marked as available under a free license or public domain". Also, Recipero, Ltd is not (even allegedly) the author or copyright holder of this work. We don't have to delete stuff from Wikipedia just because someone, even the copyright holder, doesn't like it; we have Fair Use rights, even in that case. --Elvey (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a WP:Non-free content review listing). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Fogg kline high.gif[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete without prejudice against recreation under an appropriate license. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fogg kline high.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed to be the work of the uploader, but the author died in 1962, so that claim is dubious. Not sure if it satisfies {{PD-US-no notice}}, {{PD-US-not renewed}} or anything else. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Jonathan Scales in 2013.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:07, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The photo doesn't seem to be anywhere in the source provided and an images search doesn't bring up anything. The uploader claims this photo is public domain because it is an "artist promotional photo." ALH (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Savitha Sastry performing at the Music Academy, Chennai (2013).jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Savitha Sastry performing at the Music Academy, Chennai (2013).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The photo is watermarked with "©2013 Aditya Sastry". ALH (talk) 15:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Can be speedily deleted under F8. Available at commons:File:Savithayudh.jpg with an OTRS ticket. ALH (talk) 05:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Sjömarkens Idrottsförening, logo.png[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep under correct licensing. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a logo, so I'm disputing the self claim. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like {{PD-textlogo}} anyway. De728631 (talk) 15:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Robert-Bamma7.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete No evidence of free license. Danger High voltage! 15:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC) Danger High voltage! 15:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Robert-Bamma7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The e-mail correspondence quoted on the file information page only seems to indicate transfer of a physical copy of the image and not transfer of intellectual property rights. As it stands, the image doesn't seem to have any valid licence. Stefan2 (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Revised logo for IITB Racing.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This is clearly a logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Yankeespillow.jpg[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy deletion as copyvio (derivative work). This was only used on a user page draft so fair use criteria did not apply. De728631 (talk) 15:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Yankeespillow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.