Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Broken Spur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:10, 26 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW as part of the Chaneyverse cleanup - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Chaney. The Bushranger One ping only 07:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Broken Spur[edit]

The Broken Spur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTFILM. Most of the 'references' are either to user generated sites, or to sites that don't mention the movie. I can't find any third party references to this film. Dbrodbeck (talk) 20:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, Has the same problems as the others. Doesn't meet WP:GNG, MarnetteD|Talk 20:35, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I did find this LA Times article from the 80s that refer to it going into production, but I can't find any actual reviews or anything else that would show that it passes NFILM. The article otherwise has the same issues as the other sock-created Chaney articles: it makes a lot of claims that cannot be backed up with reliable sources and given that some of the claims in other articles have been questioned as a hoax, I think that the safest thing here would be to delete this and turn it into a redirect (after the Chaney related issues are resolved as a whole) rather than just make it a redirect with history. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 16:21, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.