Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KMO2014 (talk | contribs) at 06:46, 9 March 2022 (Requesting protection for Butterfly World Tour). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit war. Rastinition (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Seems to have stopped. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - I want to keep it protected from fake IPs and vandals so that no one except autoconfirmed users and administrators can edit my user page. Please make it protected for a permanent time. Thank you. Rjsb0191 (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: And if memory serves, non autoconfimred users cannot edit user pages, so you are already protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It serves :) --Blablubbs (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 05:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Let me know if it starts up again. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism - negative exponent in CDF Anon685 (talk) 06:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: (in my sheldon cooper voice) One person's passion is another's Poisson --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Potentially embarassing article for Russian government, given Utkin is an alleged GRU operative and neo-nazi. High amount of edits, suspect vandalism. 80.200.124.19 (talk) 11:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Not seeing the need. Deferring --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Potential IP vandalism. Talk page Politicially embarrassing article for Russia, given group's ties to GRU and allegations of far right sympathies. 80.200.124.19 (talk) 11:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Not seeing the need. deferring --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:53, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Considering current events, a longer temporary protection is in order. Ifnord (talk) 14:36, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Cyberbot, you're working too hard. go get some coffee. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A number of unsourced edits over the past week or two, please also invoke Arbitration Committee Discretionary sanctions. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: regullar admin action --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple attempts to delete the section on her assault, and the well-documented accused CapnZapp (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term vandalism from dynamic IPs. – DarkGlow19:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More flies than I can smack, they seem to be following CMD around. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The IP address has been blocked. Dunno if protection is still needed. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:47, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruption from new editors due to the ongoing 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, likely due to a popular twitter trend among those who follow OSINT circles. --benlisquareTCE 00:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism; continued removal of references, referenced material. IP editor is already blocked by an administrator for disruptive edits to the page Hope (given name). ExRat (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of unreasonable editings. AlexandraRock88900 (talk) 02:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs, possibly the same person given similar vandalism and edit summaries. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TFA being vandalised. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: One person whitewashing this fringe unregistered Neo-Nazi group by adding WP:OR. TolWol56 (talk) 05:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 05:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:Persistent vandalism mostly by unlogged users Volten001 05:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBEE Curbon7 (talk) 05:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User 'Ilovetati91' keeps adding unreliable, illegitimate, and potentially false information into this page:

The Wikipedia editing rules regarding “biographies of living persons” clearly demonstrate that “editors must take particular care when writing biographical material about living persons. Contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately; do not move it to the talk page. This applies to any material related to living persons on any page in any namespace, not just article space.” Further, “BLPs should be written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. Articles should document in a non-partisan manner what reliable secondary sources have published about the subjects, and in some circumstances what the subjects have published about themselves.” In Nickson’s book about Carey, no reliable published source was provided to prove that 150k and 200k tickets were respectively sold for Carey’s Tokyo concerts in 1996 and 1998. In this sense, Nickson’s claims could be entirely fabricated, and editing such claims into Carey’s page could be seen as an overstatement or even an understatement of Carey’s touring career. Moreover, by labelling his own book as an “unauthorized biography”, Nickson clearly attempted to avoid his legal liability for the content since an “unauthorized biography” would no doubt give rise to untrue or false claims as well as pure fabrications. Thus, it is unlikely that Nickson’s book is an appropriate source considering all mentioned aspects and it should not be included in any Carey-related pages. KMO2014 (talk) 06:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]