Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glendene Grant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Disappearance of Jessie Foster. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glendene Grant

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, mother of a missing person who apparently hosted a podcast. I would recommend merge to Disappearance of Jessie Foster but that article itself has notability problems. I think WP:BLP1E would also apply here. Kelly ^hi! 13:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 22:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge: Topic of importance, similar disappearances have led to others forming major national organizations, e.g. Amber Alert and such. Montanabw ^(talk) 23:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant news coverage. [1] [2] [3] etc. Collect (talk) 00:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and retarget to Disappearance of Jessie Foster, the event for which she is notable. The organizations and all that can/should be mentioned there. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to disappearance of Jessie Foster. This is what she's notable for, and pretty much everything we know about her can fit in there. There's no reason why we can't describe her activism and background, but as far as I can tell, all the coverage about her is in the context of her daughter's disappearance. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I just did a little clean up on the target. Legacypac (talk) 10:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Not notable enough for her own article (internet radio show? really? that's not even a claim to notability), insufficient independent coverage of her specifically, and a merge seems like a sensible outcome. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge with no prejudice against later splitting. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.