Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Sossi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Sossi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable yet. Promotional article which is probably meant to enhance her campaign. Might be notable when elected. Nothing in her legal career makes her notable Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as still questionable for the applicable notability, not currently convincing. SwisterTwister talk 16:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unless she is elected. Page was more than likely created for Sossi's campaign. Meatsgains (talk) 00:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As always, unelected candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if you cannot provide and properly source credible evidence that she would already have qualified for a Wikipedia article for some other reason before becoming a candidate, then she does not become notable enough for an article until she wins the seat. But nothing else claimed or sourced here is enough to get her over the bar if you take the candidacy out of the equation. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in November if she wins. Bearcat (talk) 18:43, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.