Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 April 26

< April 25	April 27 >

April 26

LFB Dog Investigation.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LFB Dog Investigation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Firemansam08 (notify | contribs).

Talk page indicates image is a copyvio. MBisanz ^talk 07:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One would think so. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PacinoIn88Minutes01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PacinoIn88Minutes01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kudret abi (notify | contribs).

Fails WP:NFCC#8: Use does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the article. This 88 Minutes is barely mentioned. There is no need to see Pacino in character. —teb728 t c 07:46, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really was questioning this image Alfredo James Pacino.jpg placed in the Article Al Pacino. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you are referring to this post at MCQ. The other image is not at issue here, but since you mention it, I will discuss it further at MCQ. —teb728 t c 20:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

55808497mavisyang426200960208AM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aspuink (talk) 10:40, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of this file is currently being discussed in accordance with Wikipedia's image use policy. The outcome of the discussion may result in the file's usage or license being changed, or possibly its deletion.

Please share your thoughts on the matter at this file's entry on the Files for discussion page.

Feel free to edit the file description page, but the page must not be blanked and this notice must not be removed until the discussion is closed.

How to list a file for discussion:
1. Add {{ffd|log=2024 October 7}} to the file description page.
2. Add {{subst:Ffd2|1=Files for deletion/2009 April 26|uploader= |reason= }} ~~~~ to add a line to today's FfD.
3. Add {{ffdc|1=Files for deletion/2009 April 26|log=2024 October 7}} in the caption on each page in the file links.
4. Please consider notifying the uploader by placing {{subst:ffd notice|1=Files for deletion/2009 April 26}} on their talk page(s).

This template should only be used on file pages.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PartialBirth_Method_HouseDebateProLife.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PartialBirth_Method_HouseDebateProLife.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BCSWowbagger (notify | contribs).

no documentation of permission Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Parwez.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parwez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Asjadbukhari (notify | contribs).

no reason given that this image would be PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pc750pix.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pc750pix.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marcusvox (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, I don't think this is really needed Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pdhead1_nav.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pdhead1_nav.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Abdominator (notify | contribs).

not sure the banner for the PD photo site is also PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pemigewasset River, Woodstock, NH.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pemigewasset River, Woodstock, NH.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hugh Manatee (notify | contribs).

undated, no way to determine copyright status Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Penda_foes.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penda_foes.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rmhermen (notify | contribs).

no source, unclear EV Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Kind of surprised that this still exists. This was a draft version of an illustration for the Penda of Mercia article - which now uses File:Britain peoples circa 600.svg. Rmhermen (talk) 16:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Persina_Natural_Park_Belene.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Persina_Natural_Park_Belene.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TodorBozhinov (notify | contribs).

likely copyright violation - source doesn't seem to have anything about copyright policies[1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PhilCongRib.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhilCongRib.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Husnock (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ph_seal_pangasinan_sancarloscity.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ph_seal_pangasinan_sancarloscity.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Angeles624 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, doesn't appear to be the official seal according to San Carlos City, Pangasinan? Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PhanChuTrinh.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, almost certainly PD both in the U.S. and in Vietnam.

File:PhanChuTrinh.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CarlKenner (notify | contribs).

no reason given this is public domain, subject died 1926 Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually maybe this should be kept, {{PD-Vietnam}} says photos enter the public domain 50 years after publication. We probably can safely assume this was published before 1959? Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:16, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PhilRibbon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhilRibbon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Husnock (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Piazza_del_Popolo_Piranesi.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piazza_del_Popolo_Piranesi.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs).

source is not specific and doesn't allow us to verify the copyright status Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pierre-Jules_Hetzel.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pierre-Jules_Hetzel.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Postdlf (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, superseded by File:Pierre-Jules Hetzel.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

PicCoat1.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PicCoat1.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hardouin (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, superseded by File:Blason région fr Picardie.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

SC Funnies 1959a.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SC Funnies 1959a.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ReverendLogos (notify | contribs).

Used only as part of a gallery, comic is not discussed. Use of a non-free image not justified. J Milburn (talk) 12:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Susan-Boyle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Susan-Boyle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bravedog (notify | contribs).

Copyrighted photo which belongs to the Deadline Press & Picture Agency Tovojolo (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously. Wow I thought she looks more like 68 than 48. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't know if it matters, but a similar/identical photo has also be uploaded to commons; it's being considered for deletion there, too. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 14:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

UAL 175 Pre impacto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:UAL 175 Pre impacto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ruuta 25 (notify | contribs).

Uploader claims that he is the copyright holder, but this is unlikely; the image pretty clearly was just taken from the internet. Normally I would AGF, but in this case the uploader has a bad history of misunderstanding copyright and fair use (see his talk page). rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 20:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also note: File:WTC en llamas.jpg, also uploaded by this user and claimed as PD, might be copyvio as well. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 20:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

NEW 49ERS 2009.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NEW 49ERS 2009.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Buonaparte69 (notify | contribs).

This image has been replaced with File:NFCW-Uniform-SF.PNG to keep uniform image titles standard. ~Richmond96 t • c 23:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.