Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bondage Game
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 13:39, 21 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:39, 21 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Redirect can be created if desired. The Bushranger One ping only 02:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Bondage Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This animated film is extremely obscure, thus finding reliable sources for information about it may not be possible. Also, very few pages link to this article, if any. LegallyBlindGamer (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Being an orphan or being obscure is not a reason for deletion, but a lack of reliable coverage in either English or Japanese is. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to bondage per nom.—S Marshall T/C 21:36, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per nom. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't think a redirect will be worthwhile, since "Bondage Game" doesn't seem to be a common term related to bondage. it's just the name of a hentai. At the most, it should be "Bondage game" and not "Bondage Game" that should be a redirect. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this fails WP:GNG and is unlikely to do so in the future. BO | Talk 18:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.