User talk:9k7kq3

September 2013

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of blacklisted keywords in China have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chinese Wikipedia with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. ///EuroCarGT 20:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It does not look constructive because you either work for one of those companies and you do not want to list other competitions and want to create a MONOPOLY. Adding another search engine to the list is NOT considered vandalism. Not adding another search engine is EVIL. It just seems not arranged in the right order for you. 9k7kq3 (talk) 20:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi 9k7kq3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. --benlisquare_T•C•E 02:36, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 days for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Just to inform you that you have been suspected of sockpuppetry. An ongoing investigation is currently underway at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/9k7kq3. --benlisquare_T•C•E 19:57, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/9k7kq3. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans will be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 20:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]