Talk:Esperantujo

Constructed languages: Esperanto C‑class Mid‑importance

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Esperanto task force.
	This article is an Esperanto core topic.

Improve the article

Hello to everybody following this article. I personally updated the article about Esperantujo in the Esperanto Wikipedia, and remarked than there and on the French Wikipedia, the number of visits rised a lot, obviously because readers want to know what is happening in Esperantujo. Is one of you able to add info or even - best - translate the Esperanto article into yours? This way, it would help improve the visibility of Esperanto. Thanks a lot! — SGC.Alex (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhere in the Population section, could someone tell me please, what is the population? How many people speak Esperanto? Has any statistician come up with an estimate? TIA Twixter (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Religion in Esperantujo

It has become standard on Wikipedia to have independent articles on the presence and influence of particular religions or philosophies in particular countries (e.g. Islam in France, Christianity in China, Scientology in Australia, Bahá'í Faith in Sweden). I have been wondering if it would be appropriate to create articles on the presence and influence of particular religions or philosophies in Esperantujo. I know Esperantujo is not a country per se, but it is a community of people where certain religions and philosophies are more common than others. The following are some of the articles that could be created: Islam in Esperantujo, Christianity in Esperantujo, Catholicism in Esperantujo, Bahá'í Faith in Esperantujo, Oomoto in Esperantujo, and Atheism in Esperantujo. I think this would give more credibility to the concept of Esperantujo, too, as it would make it clear that Esperantujo is an actual community of people with different cultures within it. Thoughts? Michipedian (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Esperanto-contributors in Wikiepdia/vikipedio

Why not link to a page where people can find Esperanto-speakers as authors or/and translators of Wikipedia ? I can not find them here. --Alifono (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Esperantujo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120812001647/http://www.moresnet.nl/english/geschiedenis_en.htm to http://www.moresnet.nl/english/geschiedenis_en.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better version of the Anthem

Does anybody know of a better/more modern/embellished version of the anthem which we could use on Wikipedia? The current one is kinda "meh", especially compared to other anthems. TucanHolmes (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

eo:La Espero uses the same sound recording; but there are at least three known scoresheets of it, namely one for one voice in B♭ major at the Esperanto Wikipedia, as well as one (two pages in PDF) for four voices in G major and one in A♭ major for singer and piano (or, of course, for unison choir with piano accompaniment) at Wikimedia Commons. — Tonymec (talk) 20:11, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]