Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganpati zone

Ganpati zone

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was going to move to Draftspace but it isn’t worth it. Both the founder and the organization fail to satisfy WP:GNG/WP:BIO & WP:ORG respectively as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliables sources independent of them. Needless to say there is 0 WP:ORGDEPTH. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree it is A7 material. Mccapra (talk) 05:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as bordering on CSD A7, no assertion of notability. Google analytic links aren't sources. Vanity article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources that show the subject is notable.-- Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't meet GNG, looks to be COI / Promo. Lirazelf (talk) 15:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I respect all of you. I cleared 6 Google certifications which took many hours of day and night struggle ....i think it was my mistake as its of no value. As very few people clear 1 or 2 but i did 6. I will work more hard and try to come back. Regards Pankaj verma 23 (talk) 19:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]