Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Career-Eco
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 02:14, 20 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 02:14, 20 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 20:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Career-Eco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no significant coverage for this website. Being on two local news channels does not show notability. Anyway, the links to the news videos are dead links. Fails WP:WEB. SL93 (talk) 18:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Notability is barely asserted, never mind established with reliable sources. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 11:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 13:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree that there is no meaningful assertion of notability here, and the coverage doesn't amount to signifant coverage. Dawn Bard (talk) 00:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Even though the local news cast links are dead, I'll accept that they had local coverage. But a bit of local coverage does not equate to notability. -- Whpq (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.